Re: Eta Carina shape explained by sunspot gravity influence.

On Jan 20, 7:56 am, "LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx" <LeoV...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I missed the original article here, so I give here a copy:

Eta Carina shape explained by sunspot gravity influence.

Eta Carina is called a supernova imposter event due to surface
instability, however, sunspots should be also responsible for the
double
the lobed matter ejections.

Proposal for the origin of the peculiar form of Eta Carinae and
planetary nebulae. If the sunspot content of a binary star is growing
it
might support the explosion behaviour of the outer layers of the star,
because the sunspot content could become unstable by the gravitational
influence of the binary star. If some of the sunspot content is
ejected
too, they will attract the exploded material and could be able to
force
the material to bend around the ejected sunspots into a globular
shape.

Sunspots are assumed to be former comet nuclei, with a dark matter
content called "new black holes".

Only by those who choose to ignore the empirical data (periodicities
in sunspot numbers at 11 and 100 year cycles, the "butterfly" pattern
of the variation of sunspot latitudes during the solar cycle, the
absence of comet sightings that could account for sunspots despite
vigilant surveillance of the proximity of the sun, the absence of a 6+
year sunspot pattern corresponding to the large Jovian family of
comets, the absence of data to support the definition of "new black
holes" as former cometary nuclei).

Reality has a way of crushing a beautiful theory into roadkill.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.

Quantcast