Re: hypothesis > accepted theory?
- From: zion-lion <damianjohnbrown@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:25:04 -0800 (PST)
I think you need to go back to school. You are to the chemicalI have already enquired about resitting my Maths, Physics and
physicist what NoEinstein is to the Relativistic Physics community.
You are out of your league here.
Chemistry A-Levels
but using an argument that mathematicians are right with an abstract
theory does not sway me
current 'scientists' are delving too complicatedly into things that
they can't prove
and as I have pointed out, I wrote photon instead of PROTON in my
first message
I will have a USB experimenter board on Tuesday, so my head will be
clearer
but the ratio of frequencies and phases of 'particles' will have
something to do with PRIME numbers
possibly the paired ones, like 41 and 43 or 17 and 19 or 11 and 13 or
3 and 5 or 5 and 7 or 29 and 31 or 59 and 61 or 71 and 73 and higher
as for photons, I have told the Dr of Astrophysics, they move in
straight lines and have 'virtual' mass
that is why they show colour as they permeate the surface of solids
and are only 'bounced back' when they hit a nucleus a few atoms deep
and the electrons chop them up to give a frequency of colour on the
way in and out - just a hypothesis - as I say, ignorance is bliss
thanks for the feedback Tom, but it has always been in my mind that
the 'waves' are electromagnetic forces caused by particles whizzing
round in harmony
probability theories and abstract maths are merely random estimates
I'll get PICO services going and we might get a better look...
Good Luck
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hypothesis > accepted theory?
- From: tadchem
- Re: hypothesis > accepted theory?
- References:
- hypothesis > accepted theory?
- From: zion-lion
- Re: hypothesis > accepted theory?
- From: tadchem
- hypothesis > accepted theory?
- Prev by Date: Re: ENTROPY and the Direction of Time from the BIG BANG
- Next by Date: Re: How can there be anything?
- Previous by thread: Re: hypothesis > accepted theory?
- Next by thread: Re: hypothesis > accepted theory?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|