Re: hypothesis > accepted theory?




I think you need to go back to school.  You are to the chemical
physicist what NoEinstein is to the Relativistic Physics community.
You are out of your league here.

I have already enquired about resitting my Maths, Physics and
Chemistry A-Levels
but using an argument that mathematicians are right with an abstract
theory does not sway me

current 'scientists' are delving too complicatedly into things that
they can't prove
and as I have pointed out, I wrote photon instead of PROTON in my
first message
I will have a USB experimenter board on Tuesday, so my head will be
clearer
but the ratio of frequencies and phases of 'particles' will have
something to do with PRIME numbers
possibly the paired ones, like 41 and 43 or 17 and 19 or 11 and 13 or
3 and 5 or 5 and 7 or 29 and 31 or 59 and 61 or 71 and 73 and higher

as for photons, I have told the Dr of Astrophysics, they move in
straight lines and have 'virtual' mass
that is why they show colour as they permeate the surface of solids
and are only 'bounced back' when they hit a nucleus a few atoms deep
and the electrons chop them up to give a frequency of colour on the
way in and out - just a hypothesis - as I say, ignorance is bliss

thanks for the feedback Tom, but it has always been in my mind that
the 'waves' are electromagnetic forces caused by particles whizzing
round in harmony
probability theories and abstract maths are merely random estimates

I'll get PICO services going and we might get a better look...
Good Luck
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why SR?
    ... I am trying to explain basic relativity to Roberts who can do the maths better than me but clearly does not understand the very basics. ... According to Lorentz the laws of physics are such that the 'true speed' of light is concealed from us and we always compute the same value. ... according to Maxwell/Lorentz wave in aether theory there are other properties of the aether which can be detected. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Determinacy in classical physics (naive question)
    ... > to have a look again at the physics he learnt as an undergraduate... ... Indeed my question is rather a maths question. ... > precises that it means the classical theory of gravitation + ... It is mostly if not wholy based on classical theory. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
    ... >>> He asked for help in chemistry class, sophomore level, not math ... >>> or particle physics. ... Coulomb gauge is adaquate. ... The maths are much simpler ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Why SR?
    ... You don't seem to realize that math is a language for expressing who the physics maps to reality. ... Thus the way the maths is derived is inconsistent with what is actually happening even if it gives the correct answer. ... diverse viewpoints hit upon similar-looking mathematics, ... Some modern concepts are far more fanciful than Lorentz's aether. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Why SR?
    ... You don't seem to realize that math is a language for expressing who the physics maps to reality. ... Thus the way the maths is derived is inconsistent with what is actually happening even if it gives the correct answer. ... diverse viewpoints hit upon similar-looking mathematics, ... Some modern concepts are far more fanciful than Lorentz's aether. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)