Re: Galaxy distortions shed light on cosmic acceleration

On 31 jan, 15:34, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:18 am, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 31 jan, 14:52, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 31, 4:52 am, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

[snip whining]

This is how science works - someone creates an idea, and it is tested.
If you don't like it, there are plenty of churches that would be happy
to tell you _exactly_ how the world works without the messy problem of
actually checking.

Now whining, just laughing at you and your dark ages beliefs.

From the comfort of your computer chair using technology devised from
a theory you hate using the scientific method which you reject.

Not really. I hate no theory. The problem is that applying scientific
method to trying to measure the thickness of angel wings simply
is a waste of time and public funding. Decades lost on such
ridiculous attempts.

Would be put to much better use further exploring the foundation.

But oh, yes... I remember. You and your Copenhagen colleagues
don't even understand, let alone believe, we can understand
more about it.

So you have no clue. Others more rational will eventually take
care of business.

André MIchaud
.