sci.physics

• Date Index

---

• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Feb 08, Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• Why gravity bends light, and gravitational waves are undetected, Michael Helland
  • Re: Why gravity bends light, and gravitational waves are undetected, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Why gravity bends light, and gravitational waves are undetected, Igor
    • Re: Why gravity bends light, and gravitational waves are undetected, Michael Helland
    • Re: Why gravity bends light, and gravitational waves are undetected, Michael Helland
      • Re: Why gravity bends light, and gravitational waves are undetected, Igor
      • Re: Why gravity bends light, and gravitational waves are undetected, Michael Helland
      • Re: Why gravity bends light, and gravitational waves are undetected, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Why gravity bends light, and gravitational waves are undetected, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Why gravity bends light, and gravitational waves are undetected, Uncle Al
• Re: Derivation of the Maxwell Stress-Energy Tensor from Five-Dimensional Geometry, using a Four-Dimensional Variation, Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: Derivation of the Maxwell Stress-Energy Tensor from Five-Dimensional Geometry, using a Four-Dimensional Variation, Ken S. Tucker
• the universe is a note, john
  • Re: the universe is a note, Sam Wormley
    • Re: the universe is a note, john
      • Re: the universe is a note, Sam Wormley
      • Re: the universe is a note, john
      • Re: the universe is a note, Sam Wormley
  • Re: the universe is a note, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: the universe is a note, john
      • Re: the universe is a note, john
  • Re: the universe is a note, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: the universe is a note, Uncle Al
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Eef
• Quantum Gravity 234.6: Closure-Stability of Fundamental Sets, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 234.6: Closure-Stability of Fundamental Sets, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 234.6: Closure-Stability of Fundamental Sets, doug
• Testing for the existence of a electron/positron aether, franklinhu
  • Re: Testing for the existence of a electron/positron aether, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Testing for the existence of a electron/positron aether, Sue...
  • Re: Testing for the existence of a electron/positron aether, Uncle Al
• QUANTUM TIME WITH SIGNAL/NOISE, rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Vehicle's angular velocity w -> Rate of change of Euler angles, Nick
  • Re: Vehicle's angular velocity w -> Rate of change of Euler angles, Androcles
    • Re: Vehicle's angular velocity w -> Rate of change of Euler angles, Nick
      • Re: Vehicle's angular velocity w -> Rate of change of Euler angles, Androcles
• Time travel, faazex
  • Re: Time travel, Androcles
  • Re: Time travel, Phil Cartwright
  • Re: Time travel, Uncle Al
  • Re: Time travel, CWatters
• About plate tectonics..., Edward Green
  • Re: About plate tectonics..., tadchem
  • Re: About plate tectonics..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: About plate tectonics..., Uncle Al
• How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, W. Watson
  • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, Androcles
  • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, Al Lergy
    • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, max
      • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, Al Lergy
      • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, max
      • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, Benj
      • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, Al Lergy
    • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, W. Watson
  • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, Uncle Al
    • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, Peter Fairbrother
    • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, W. Watson
  • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, HardySpicer
  • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, tadchem
  • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, Peter Fairbrother
    • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, W. Watson
  • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: NASA's Swift satellite images a galaxy ablaze with starbirth, Sam Wormley
• chaotic pendulum, connie
  • Re: chaotic pendulum, Randy Poe
  • Re: chaotic pendulum, Jim Black
• neutron as molecular positronium..., jaha84
  • Re: neutron as molecular positronium..., Sam Wormley
    • Re: neutron as molecular positronium..., jaha84
      • Re: neutron as molecular positronium..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: neutron as molecular positronium..., jaha84
      • Re: neutron as molecular positronium..., Sam Wormley
  • Re: neutron as molecular positronium..., Uncle Al
  • Re: neutron as molecular positronium..., PD
    • Re: neutron as molecular positronium..., jaha84
• "I will not accept if nominated, and I will not serve if elected.", Tom Potter
  • Re: "I will not accept if nominated, and I will not serve if elected.", Eric Gisse
  • Re: "I will not accept if nominated, and I will not serve if elected.", hanson
    • Each author is talking about himself, no one else., Jeff▲Relf
• Osteocyte lacunae found on Martian bones, Lin Liangtai
• Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Paul E. Schoen
  • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sue...
  • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sue...
      • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sue...
      • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sue...
      • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sue...
      • Re: Mass affects time - could time cause gravity?, Sam Wormley
• Halo around the path of sunlight!!, rAgAv
  • Re: Halo around the path of sunlight!!, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Halo around the path of sunlight!!, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Halo around the path of sunlight!!, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Halo around the path of sunlight!!, Androcles
  • Re: Halo around the path of sunlight!!, tadchem
    • Re: Halo around the path of sunlight!!, Androcles
• Evidence for black hole nucleus splitting and pairing inside several nebula., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Evidence for black hole nucleus splitting and pairing inside several nebula., tadchem
    • Re: Evidence for black hole nucleus splitting and pairing inside several nebula., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Evidence for black hole nucleus splitting and pairing inside several nebula., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• gravitational force w.r.t. body axes on object in space???, weg22
  • Re: gravitational force w.r.t. body axes on object in space???, Jim Black
• Electromagnetic field, Harry
  • Re: Electromagnetic field, Randy Poe
  • Re: Electromagnetic field, srp2inc
  • Re: Electromagnetic field, Sue...
  • Re: Electromagnetic field, tadchem
    • Re: Electromagnetic field, Harry
      • Re: Electromagnetic field, Sue...
      • Re: Electromagnetic field, Matthew Lybanon
• For Potter--Note the applications and economics of GPS, Sam Wormley
  • Re: For Potter--Note the applications and economics of GPS, hanson
    • Re: For Potter--Note the applications and economics of GPS, Androcles
    • From quarks to galaxy clusters, to governments and the human mind., Jeff▲Relf
  • Re: For Potter--Note the applications and economics of GPS, Tom Potter
    • Re: For Potter--Note the applications and economics of GPS, PD
      • Re: For Potter--Note the applications and economics of GPS, Tom Potter
    • Re: For Potter--Note the applications and economics of GPS, Sam Wormley
      • Re: For Potter--Note the applications and economics of GPS, Tom Potter
• Feeling the force on a single atom, Sam Wormley
• standing waves, shahars10
  • Re: standing waves, Sam Wormley
    • Re: standing waves, shahars10
      • Re: standing waves, Sam Wormley
      • Re: standing waves, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: standing waves, Sam Wormley
      • Re: standing waves, doug
      • Re: standing waves, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: standing waves, Sam Wormley
  • Re: standing waves, Androcles
  • Re: standing waves, tadchem
    • Re: standing waves, shahars10
      • Re: standing waves, Androcles
      • Re: standing waves, tadchem
• Homemade nuclear weapons links., reactor1967
  • Re: Homemade nuclear weapons links., Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Homemade nuclear weapons links., Al Lergy
• Annalen der Physik at googlebooks, Allan Adler
  • Re: Annalen der Physik at googlebooks, d_hainz
• consistency of nuclear models, rkolesin
• Quantum Gravity 235.0: Hypergeometric Identities via Probable Causation/Influence (PI), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 235.0: Hypergeometric Identities via Probable Causation/Influence (PI), Al Lergy
    • Re: Quantum Gravity 235.0: Hypergeometric Identities via Probable Causation/Influence (PI), doug
      • Re: Quantum Gravity 235.0: Hypergeometric Identities via Probable Causation/Influence (PI), local host
    • Re: Quantum Gravity 235.0: Hypergeometric Identities via Probable Causation/Influence (PI), OsherD
• New Class- Form Causality, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: New Class- Form Causality, Uncle Al
• Know any good mnemonics?, dkw12002@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, Androcles
    • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, dkw12002@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, Androcles
  • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, dkw12002@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, tadchem
    • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, dkw12002@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, Uncle Al
      • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, dkw12002@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, tadchem
      • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, dkw12002@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, PD
    • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, dkw12002@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Know any good mnemonics?, PD
• The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, bkh99
  • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Uncle Al
  • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Sam Wormley
  • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, CWatters
  • Re: The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity, festusbyrne
• Ripple effect from Fermilab cuts, PD
  • Re: Ripple effect from Fermilab cuts, Androcles
  • Re: Ripple effect from Fermilab cuts, Uncle Al
    • Re: Ripple effect from Fermilab cuts, Eric Gisse
      • The Ketchikan International Airport on Gravina Island., Jeff▲Relf
• "Retic Postings and SPAM", Eef
• Researchers Develop a Type of Rubber That Can Repair Itself, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Researchers Develop a Type of Rubber That Can Repair Itself, Uncle Al
• Mutual Assets Securities, Government/Corporate Tax-Exempt, Tax Free, and Municipal Bond, CWM-Banker
• Re: Response to "Pisano's" post defending wars for Jews, Tom Potter
• Re: Nanohydrogenerator Mk II, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Nanohydrogenerator Mk II, Uncle Al
• optics, STUARTe
  • Re: optics, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: optics, Sam Wormley
    • Re: optics, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: optics, Greg Neill
  • Re: optics, Vince Morgan
  • Re: optics, Androcles
  • Re: optics, tadchem
  • Re: optics, NoEinstein
    • Re: optics, STUARTe
      • Re: optics, tadchem
      • Re: optics, STUARTe
      • Re: optics, tadchem
• More still on Obama, that this one even blows my mind..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: More still on Obama, that this one even blows my mind..., Benj
  • Re: More still on Obama, that this one even blows my mind..., Vince Morgan
• Barack Obama's history...for those to whom this will be news..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Barack Obama's history...for those to whom this will be news..., Greg Neill
    • Re: Barack Obama's history...for those to whom this will be news..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Barack Obama's history...for those to whom this will be news..., Greg Neill
      • Re: Barack Obama's history...for those to whom this will be news..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Barack Obama's history...for those to whom this will be news..., Greg Neill
      • Re: Barack Obama's history...for those to whom this will be news..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Barack Obama's history...for those to whom this will be news..., Greg Neill
  • Re: Barack Obama's history...for those to whom this will be news..., Matthew Lybanon
• Who exactly is Barack Obama???, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, Greg Neill
    • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, Greg Neill
      • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, Greg Neill
      • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Who exactly is Harry C???, Greg Neill
  • Re: Who exactly is Barack Obama???, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Who exactly is Barack Obama???, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Who exactly is Barack Obama???, Greg Neill
  • Re: Who exactly is Barack Obama???, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Who exactly is Barack Obama???, Richard Herring
  • Re: Who exactly is Barack Obama???, Igor
  • Re: Who exactly is Barack Obama???, jcon
    • Re: Who exactly is Barack Obama???, Tom Potter
      • The only lord that matters is the landlord., Jeff▲Relf
      • Re: The only lord that matters is the landlord., Tom Potter
• Dawn of the Large Hadron Collider -- Why do objects have mass?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Dawn of the Large Hadron Collider -- Why do objects have mass?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Dawn of the Large Hadron Collider -- Why do objects have mass?, PD
• Electron Stroboscope, Sam Wormley
• global slowing, jer0en
  • Re: global slowing, Sam Wormley
    • Re: global slowing, jer0en
  • Re: global slowing, tadchem
    • Re: global slowing, jer0en
      • Re: global slowing, tadchem
    • Re: global slowing, jer0en
  • Re: global slowing, Uncle Al
    • Re: global slowing, jer0en
      • Re: global slowing, Androcles
      • Re: global slowing, Uncle Al
      • Re: global slowing, jer0en
      • Re: global slowing, Uncle Al
      • Re: global slowing, jer0en
      • Re: global slowing, jer0en
      • Re: global slowing, jimp
      • Re: global slowing, Uncle Al
      • Re: global slowing, jer0en
      • Re: global slowing, jer0en
      • Re: global slowing, tadchem
    • Re: global slowing, Eric Gisse
      • Seattle is Cloudy with highs around 50° and lows around 40°., Jeff▲Relf
  • Re: global slowing, Sam Wormley
    • Re: global slowing, jer0en
      • Re: global slowing, jimp
  • Re: global slowing, jer0en
• Space Travel, James Colvier
  • Re: Space Travel, Uncle Al
    • Re: Space Travel, James Colvier
      • Re: Space Travel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Space Travel, Androcles
    • Re: Space Travel, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Space Travel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Space Travel, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Space Travel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Space Travel, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Space Travel, Sam Wormley
      • Theoretically, the SI kilogram could be defined as a tick count., Jeff▲Relf
      • Re: Space Travel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Space Travel, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Space Travel, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Space Travel, Matthew Lybanon
  • Re: Space Travel, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Space Travel, Androcles
      • Re: Space Travel, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Space Travel, Androcles
      • Re: Space Travel, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Space Travel, Androcles
      • Re: Space Travel, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Space Travel, Androcles
    • No ticks and no sticks; motionless, volumeless and massless., Jeff▲Relf
• Scientists Tuning Very Large Array Radio Telescope for Deeper Exploration, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Scientists Tuning Very Large Array Radio Telescope for Deeper Exploration, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Scientists Tuning Very Large Array Radio Telescope for Deeper Exploration, Sam Wormley
• Vector inflation points the way, Sam Wormley
• US missile strikes stricken satellite, Sam Wormley
  • Re: US missile strikes stricken satellite, Uncle Al
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Eef
  • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Benj
• Homemade Atomic CLock Attempt Disproves Equivalence, Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Feigning Evolution, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Feigning Evolution, tadchem
• CO2 Inflated Soaring Chute, Douglas Eagleson
• Roots Compressor Style Air Flow Engine, Douglas Eagleson
• SLOTs for Turbine Variation of Internal Pressure., Douglas Eagleson
• Limits of effective computation, uri
  • Re: Limits of effective computation, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Limits of effective computation, uri
    • Re: Limits of effective computation, evgenijb
• need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, weg22
  • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, Greg Neill
  • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, CWatters
  • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, Randy Poe
    • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, Androcles
      • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, Randy Poe
      • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, Androcles
  • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, Androcles
    • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, weg22
      • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, Randy Poe
      • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, weg22
      • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, Randy Poe
      • Re: need to create a 6 DOF model of space vehicle, Androcles
• Universe's accelerating expansion, uri
  • Re: Universe's accelerating expansion, Douglas Eagleson
    • Re: Universe's accelerating expansion, uri
      • Re: Universe's accelerating expansion, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: Universe's accelerating expansion, Igor
• Interested in examples in linear motion?, mgruic
• Re: Wright Flyer I Model Airplane, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Wall Street Bank Run, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Astronomers discover largest-ever dark matter structures spanning 270M light-years, G. L. Bradford
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Feb 25, 2008, PhDs . org
• Solve Physics Equations and Formula - ONLINE TOOL, EngineerEDGE
  • Re: Solve Physics Equations and Formula - ONLINE TOOL, Androcles
• Binding Energy Question, higis
  • Re: Binding Energy Question, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Greg Neill
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Greg Neill
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Greg Neill
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Y.Porat
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Greg Neill
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, srp2inc
  • Re: Binding Energy Question, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: Binding Energy Question, higis
      • Re: Binding Energy Question, Phil Holman
  • Re: Binding Energy Question, Uncle Al
  • Re: Binding Energy Question, Douglas Eagleson
• Is Bilge still alive?, higis
• Quantum Dot Computer Jammer Field- still for sale, Douglas Eagleson
• Objects in space, Hugh Oxford
  • Re: Objects in space, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Objects in space, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: Objects in space, John C . Polasek
    • Re: Objects in space, Greg Neill
      • Re: Objects in space, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Objects in space, Greg Neill
      • Re: Objects in space, John C . Polasek
      • Re: Objects in space, Greg Neill
  • Re: Objects in space, Androcles
• Why does light bend under gravity?, chutsu@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
  • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, tadchem
    • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Phil Holman
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Phil Holman
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
  • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Uncle Al
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, The Speaking Clock
    • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, The Speaking Clock
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, The Speaking Clock
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, The Speaking Clock
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Uncle Al
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Paul B. Andersen
  • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, franklinhu
    • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, The Speaking Clock
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, franklinhu
    • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Jim Black
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Dono
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Jim Black
    • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
  • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, NoEinstein
    • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, none
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, The Speaking Clock
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, The Speaking Clock
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, The Speaking Clock
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, The Speaking Clock
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
    • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, PD
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Androcles
  • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Michael Helland
    • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Michael Helland
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Why does light bend under gravity?, Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 234.5: More Re Dyadic Plane Genetic Code, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 234.5: More Re Dyadic Plane Genetic Code, local host
• ORBITAL MOTION, ACE
  • Re: ORBITAL MOTION, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: ORBITAL MOTION, Uncle Al
• IRBITAL MOTION, ACE
  • Re: IRBITAL MOTION, tadchem
  • Re: IRBITAL MOTION, Uncle Al
• "A Snapshot of a Photon", Yap
  • Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon", ACE
• Quantum Gravity 234.4: Dyadic Plane Genetic Code, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 234.3: More Rationals in p-adic, Regge, Hecke, Turaev-Viro, Lattice, OsherD
• The Science Jokes Wiki, Jürgen Hubert
  • Re: The Science Jokes Wiki, Sam Wormley
• Re: How to turn Lead into Gold?, John Park
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How to turn Lead into Gold?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: How to turn Lead into Gold?, tadchem
    • Re: How to turn Lead into Gold?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: How to turn Lead into Gold?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • How much does a fabricated, 3 carat diamond set you back ?, Jeff▲Relf
      • Re: How much does a fabricated, 3 carat diamond set you back ?, tadchem
      • Re: How much does a fabricated, 3 carat diamond set you back ?, Androcles
    • Re: How to turn Lead into Gold?, Benj
      • Re: How to turn Lead into Gold?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Help with project, amy
  • Re: Help with project, Phil Holman
  • Re: Help with project, tadchem
  • Re: Help with project, amy
• You figure it out., Tom Potter
  • Re: You figure it out., Sam Wormley
    • Re: You figure it out., Tom Potter
    • Re: You figure it out., Tom Potter
  • Re: You figure it out., Uncle Al
    • Re: You figure it out., Tom Potter
      • Tom Potter's grandson., Jeff▲Relf
• parachute, bob
  • Re: parachute, Sam Wormley
  • Re: parachute, Phil Holman
    • Re: parachute, Androcles
      • Re: parachute, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: parachute, Androcles
  • Re: parachute, Androcles
  • Re: parachute, Dan O.
    • Re: parachute, tadchem
  • Re: parachute, Uncle Al
    • Re: parachute, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: parachute, Uncle Al
      • : parachute for 18 wheelers, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: parachute, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• A General Service Annoucment- Please do not waste your lives., Douglas Eagleson
• Mechanical Clock Drive (automatic wind), Bill Bowden
  • Re: Mechanical Clock Drive (automatic wind), Helmut Wabnig
    • Re: Mechanical Clock Drive (automatic wind), Bill Bowden
  • Re: Mechanical Clock Drive (automatic wind), Androcles
  • Re: Mechanical Clock Drive (automatic wind), Uncle Al
    • Re: Mechanical Clock Drive (automatic wind), Bill Bowden
• Re: Explanation for the Rush of the Galaxies, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• If an LED was 100% efficient..., CWatters
  • Re: If an LED was 100% efficient..., Sam Wormley
    • Re: If an LED was 100% efficient..., CWatters
      • Re: If an LED was 100% efficient..., CWatters
      • Re: If an LED was 100% efficient..., Jim Black
  • Re: If an LED was 100% efficient..., Greg Neill
    • Re: If an LED was 100% efficient..., CWatters
  • Re: If an LED was 100% efficient..., tadchem
• Re: I'll Ignore That Black Hole in Your Head, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Why LIGO DOES NOT WORK, Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Igor, Lady Chacha
• Making a fission bomb without nuclear material, reactor1967
• Online Physics Calculators Free to use, EngineerEDGE
• depletion region for uniformly doped Silicon, jason0class
  • Re: depletion region for uniformly doped Silicon, Androcles
    • Re: depletion region for uniformly doped Silicon, jason0class
      • Re: depletion region for uniformly doped Silicon, Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 234.2: (Complex or Real) Rational Number Physics, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 234.2: (Complex or Real) Rational Number Physics, doug
    • Re: Quantum Gravity 234.2: (Complex or Real) Rational Number Physics, OsherD
• MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, ACE
  • Re: MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE, Uncle Al
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 22 Feb 08, Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 22 Feb 08, Washington, DC, Uncle Al
• A GPS Mesurable Time Distortion- In your own home., Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: A GPS Mesurable Time Distortion- In your own home., Douglas Eagleson
    • Re: A GPS Mesurable Time Distortion- In your own home., Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: A GPS Mesurable Time Distortion- In your own home., Puppet_Sock
    • Re: A GPS Mesurable Time Distortion- In your own home., Douglas Eagleson
• A Modifed H-bomb Design to Cause Local Time Distortion, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: A Modifed H-bomb Design to Cause Local Time Distortion, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: A Modifed H-bomb Design to Cause Local Time Distortion, Uncle Al
• equations for inertial simulator, Robert
  • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Robert
    • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Androcles
  • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Androcles
    • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Robert
      • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Androcles
      • Re: equations for inertial simulator, jimp
  • Re: equations for inertial simulator, nottoo
    • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Robert
      • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Robert
      • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Robert
  • Re: equations for inertial simulator, srp2inc
    • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Robert
      • Re: equations for inertial simulator, srp2inc
  • Re: equations for inertial simulator, jimp
    • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Robert
      • Re: equations for inertial simulator, jimp
  • Re: equations for inertial simulator, Douglas Eagleson
• the expanding universe must soon collapse, dedanoe
• An Electostatic Field Shape to Erase/mix ALL Dot Computer- For Sale, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: An Electostatic Field Shape to Erase/mix ALL Dot Computer- For Sale, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: An Electostatic Field Shape to Erase/mix ALL Dot Computer- For Sale, Douglas Eagleson
• Edinburgh astronomers deliver 'origins' camera, monzi . john
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy", Yap
• Re: Global Networkmarketing Opportunity, Don Stockbauer
• Nanohydrogenerator Mk II with JIT Processing, Automutt
  • Re: Nanohydrogenerator Mk II with JIT Processing, Automutt
  • Re: Nanohydrogenerator Mk II with JIT Processing, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Nanohydrogenerator Mk II with JIT Processing, Automutt
    • Re: Nanohydrogenerator Mk II with JIT Processing, Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 234.1: U.C. Davis on Dimensions of SUSY Operators via AdS/CFT, OsherD
• A New Calculation Explains the Mechanish Behind Carbon Dating, Sam Wormley
  • Re: A New Calculation Explains the Mechanish Behind Carbon Dating, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: A New Calculation Explains the Mechanish Behind Carbon Dating, Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 21 February 2008 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
• Your God or My God?, willoakley1
  • Re: Your God or My God?, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: Your God or My God?, Rock Brentwood
  • Re: Your God or My God?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Your God or My God?, tadchem
  • Re: Your God or My God?, Benj
    • Re: Your God or My God?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • To my tenants, I'm a god; but ( likewise ) I'm a tenant of my gods., Jeff▲Relf
  • The only lord that matters is the landlord., Jeff▲Relf
• solution manual manuals solution study guide, sms123
• A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, java
  • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, Sam Wormley
  • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, Androcles
  • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, Y.Porat
  • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, Igor
  • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, Dwib
  • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, dedanoe
      • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, java
      • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, java
      • Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion, Timo A. Nieminen
• Fairies, Big-foot, UFOs, Quarks, little green men and the Higgs Particle, willoakley1
  • Re: Fairies, Big-foot, UFOs, Quarks, little green men and the Higgs Particle, Androcles
    • Re: Fairies, Big-foot, UFOs, Quarks, little green men and the Higgs Particle, Benj
  • Re: Fairies, Big-foot, UFOs, Quarks, little green men and the Higgs Particle, Bob Cain
    • Re: Fairies, Big-foot, UFOs, Quarks, little green men and the Higgs Particle, Phil Cartwright
      • Re: Fairies, Big-foot, UFOs, Quarks, little green men and the Higgs Particle, Bob Cain
• GPS Question, Robert11
  • Re: GPS Question, local host
  • Re: GPS Question, Sam Wormley
  • Re: GPS Question, Androcles
• justv a few questions, jingram
  • Re: justv a few questions, Nimrod
  • Re: justv a few questions, jimp
    • Re: justv a few questions, HardySpicer
• Re: New Way to Kill Viruses: Shake Them to Death or "Cancer cells?", G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: New Way to Kill Viruses: Shake Them to Death or "Cancer cells?", Benj
    • Re: New Way to Kill Viruses: Shake Them to Death or "Cancer cells?", john
      • Re: New Way to Kill Viruses: Shake Them to Death or "Cancer cells?", Benj
• : WTC Towers: Out of Control Clean Up, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Yap
  • Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics", Manish
• COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, andrewmarcopaul
  • Re: COUPP experiment tightens limits on dark matter, Bob Cain
• Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, proton
  • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, proton
      • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, Randy Poe
    • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, Androcles
      • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, mL
      • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, Randy Poe
      • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, Androcles
    • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, proton
      • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, mL
  • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, Yanick Toutain
  • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, Uncle Al
  • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, srp2inc
    • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, Yanick Toutain
      • Re: Absolute or relative space? Newton's Laws, srp2inc
• Quantum Gravity 234.0: Expanding {2, 3, 5} to {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13}, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 234.0: Expanding {2, 3, 5} to {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13}, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 234.0: Expanding {2, 3, 5} to {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13}, Nimrod
• How we stopped Randi and Dawkins Co., dmabusa
  • Re: How we stopped Randi and Dawkins Co., Uncle Al
    • Re: How we stopped Randi and Dawkins Co., dm
      • Re: How we stopped Randi and Dawkins Co., Sam Wormley
      • Re: How we stopped Randi and Dawkins Co., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How we stopped Randi and Dawkins Co., Sam Wormley
    • Re: How we stopped Randi and Dawkins Co., dm
      • Re: How we stopped Randi and Dawkins Co., Sam Wormley
• Re: Is a clock second an interval of universal time???, johnp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is a clock second an interval of universal time???, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Is a clock second an interval of universal time???, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Geometry, Q_Gravity
  • Re: Quantum Geometry, Sam Wormley
• Can non-physics major win a Nobel Prize in physics?, higis
  • Re: Can non-physics major win a Nobel Prize in physics?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Can non-physics major win a Nobel Prize in physics?, Androcles
    • Re: Can non-physics major win a Nobel Prize in physics?, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Can non-physics major win a Nobel Prize in physics?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Can non-physics major win a Nobel Prize in physics?, Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain & Einstein (is Copyrighted), Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain & Einstein (is Copyrighted), NoEinstein
• Charge of a photon, Michael J. Strickland
  • Re: Charge of a photon, Joachim Pimiskern
  • Re: Charge of a photon, Uncle Al
    • Re: Charge of a photon, Michael J. Strickland
      • Re: Charge of a photon, Bob Cain
  • Re: Charge of a photon, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Charge of a photon, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Charge of a photon, Androcles
    • Re: Charge of a photon, john
      • Re: Charge of a photon, Androcles
      • Re: Charge of a photon, john
      • Re: Charge of a photon, Androcles
      • Re: Charge of a photon(Virtual), G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Charge of a photon, franklinhu
  • Re: Charge of a photon, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• What is Charge? - A New Survey, Michael J. Strickland
  • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Androcles
  • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Uncle Al
    • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Igor
      • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Androcles
  • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Edward Green
      • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, john
  • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Sue...
    • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Sam Wormley
  • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, willoakley1
  • Re: What is Charge? - A New Survey, Douglas Eagleson
• Re: A change of speed of light, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Elementary particles, Zanthius
  • Re: Elementary particles, Zanthius
  • Re: Elementary particles, srp2inc
  • Re: Elementary particles, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Elementary particles, Igor
• My 2007 Field Studies Video on Noah's Ark, JM20000000
  • Re: My 2007 Field Studies Video on Noah's Ark, Androcles
    • Re: My 2007 Field Studies Video on Noah's Ark, local host
    • Re: My 2007 Field Studies Video on Noah's Ark, JM
      • Re: My 2007 Field Studies Video on Noah's Ark, Androcles
• Eliminating bubbles in water, Elmer
  • Re: Eliminating bubbles in water, Uncle Al
• Cleaner water through nanotechnology, mohankumar . ttk
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?", Yap
• Benjamin Franklin and Lightning Rods, Sam Wormley
• target practice, John Dredla
  • Re: target practice, Helmut Wabnig
    • Re: target practice, John Dredla
  • Re: target practice, Androcles
    • Re: target practice, John Dredla
      • Re: target practice, Androcles
      • Re: target practice, John Dredla
      • Re: target practice, Androcles
    • Re: target practice, John Dredla
      • Re: target practice, Androcles
      • Re: target practice, John Dredla
      • Re: target practice, John Dredla
      • Re: target practice, Androcles
  • Re: target practice, PD
    • Re: target practice, John Dredla
  • Re: target practice, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: target practice, John Dredla
• Labview e Network Analyzer HP3577A, MauroM
  • Re: Labview e Network Analyzer HP3577A, wabehtdieh
    • Re: Labview e Network Analyzer HP3577A, Helmut Wabnig
• Quantum Gravity 233.9: U. Michigan Again Comes To Rescue, OsherD
• PowerPoint Presentations for Potter - Munich Satellite Navigation Summit, Sam Wormley
  • Re: PowerPoint Presentations for Potter - Munich Satellite Navigation Summit, Sam Wormley
• vacuum pumps, Allan Adler
  • Re: vacuum pumps, Eric Gisse
• Multiverse Question, Matt Hickman
  • Re: Multiverse Question, hanson
    • Re: Multiverse Question, Androcles
      • Re: Multiverse Question, hanson
      • Re: Multiverse Question, Androcles
  • Re: Multiverse Question, johnp
• Anyone seen this crazy site?, Darkwing
  • Re: Anyone seen this crazy site?, Androcles
    • Re: Anyone seen this crazy site?, Darkwing
      • Re: Anyone seen this crazy site?, Androcles
      • Re: Anyone seen this crazy site?, Benj
      • Re: Anyone seen this crazy site?, Darkwing
    • Re: Anyone seen this crazy site?, mL
      • Re: Anyone seen this crazy site?, Helmut Wabnig
• Action/Lagrangian for a photon, Mapsread
  • Re: Action/Lagrangian for a photon, Eric Gisse
• Simple Engineering Question, coltonhines
  • Re: Simple Engineering Question, jimp
    • Re: Simple Engineering Question, coltonhines
  • Re: Simple Engineering Question, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Simple Engineering Question, coltonhines
      • Re: Simple Engineering Question, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Simple Engineering Question, local host
      • Re: Simple Engineering Question, coltonhines
• Bubble chamber puts new constraints on WIMPs, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Bubble chamber puts new constraints on WIMPs, srp2inc
    • Re: Bubble chamber puts new constraints on WIMPs, Greg Neill
• God Does Play Dice with the Universe?, gashan1971
  • Re: God Does Play Dice with the Universe?, Ian Parker
    • Re: God Does Play Dice with the Universe?, gashan1971
      • Re: God Does Play Dice with the Universe?, Ian Parker
  • Re: God Does Play Dice with the Universe?, Matthew Lybanon
    • Re: God Does Play Dice with the Universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: God Does Play Dice with the Universe?, gashan1971
      • Re: God Does Play Dice with the Universe? Bert plays with photons, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: God Does Play Dice with the Universe?, Bob Cain
• "The Einstein Hoax", Yap
• Quantum Gravity 233.8: Powers of 10 and Orders of Magnitude, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.8: Powers of 10 and Orders of Magnitude, Doug
    • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.8: Powers of 10 and Orders of Magnitude, OsherD
      • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.8: Powers of 10 and Orders of Magnitude, Nimrod
      • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.8: Powers of 10 and Orders of Magnitude, OsherD
• Science Fair project - Question about how wight affects rolling distance traveled, Monty
  • Re: Science Fair project - Question about how wight affects rolling distance traveled, Randy Poe
  • Re: Science Fair project - Question about how wight affects rolling distance traveled, Androcles
  • Re: Science Fair project - Question about how wight affects rolling distancetraveled, Uncle Al
  • Re: Science Fair project - Question about how wight affects rolling distance traveled, CWatters
  • Re: Science Fair project - Question about how wight affects rolling distance traveled, Monty
    • Re: Science Fair project - Question about how wight affects rolling distance traveled, Androcles
    • Re: Science Fair project - Question about how wight affects rolling distance traveled, CWatters
  • Re: Science Fair project - Question about how wight affects rolling distance traveled, tadchem
• Re: laser propulsion, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Earths Magnetic Field, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Earths Magnetic Field, Randy Poe
    • Re: Earths Magnetic Field, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Earths Magnetic Field, brad
      • Re: Earths Magnetic Field, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum probability in technology, Scott H
  • Re: Quantum probability in technology, Uncle Al
    • Re: Quantum probability in technology, Scott H
      • Re: Quantum probability in technology, Rock Brentwood
    • Re: Quantum probability in technology, Bob Cain
  • Re: Quantum probability in technology, HardySpicer
    • Re: Quantum probability in technology, Androcles
  • Re: Quantum probability in technology, Scott H
  • Re: Quantum probability in technology, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Quantum probability in technology, Eric Gisse
• Re: How we stopped James Randi's MILLION $$$ PARANORMAL CHALLENGE, Sam Wormley
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems", Yap
• A question about E=mc^2, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Helmut Wabnig
  • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Zilla
    • Re: A question about E=mc^2, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Zilla
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Zilla
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Zilla
  • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Sue...
  • Re: A question about E=mc^2, srp2inc
    • Re: A question about E=mc^2, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, srp2inc
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Sam Wormley
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Randy Poe
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Sam Wormley
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, srp2inc
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, srp2inc
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Zilla
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Greg Neill
  • Re: A question about E=mc^2, Sam Wormley
  • Re: A question about E=mc^2, PD
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Feb 18, 2008, PhDs . org
• stern gerlach experiment and clebsch gordan coefficients, jb
• ENTROPY and DEATH, blackboab
  • Re: ENTROPY and DEATH, Sam Wormley
  • Re: ENTROPY and DEATH, kunzmilan
    • Re: ENTROPY and DEATH, Benj
      • Re: ENTROPY and DEATH, kunzmilan
      • Re: ENTROPY and DEATH, brad
      • Re: ENTROPY and DEATH, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: ENTROPY and DEATH, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: ENTROPY and DEATH, bernardZ
• Sunspots II., Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Sunspots II., Eric Gisse
  • Re: Sunspots II., Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Sunspots II., Uncle Al
    • Re: Sunspots II., Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Sunspots II., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Sunspots II., Uncle Al
      • Re: Sunspots II., Ken S. Tucker
• Quantum Gravity 233.8: Order of Magnitude 10 and {2, 4, 5}, OsherD
• Can 2nd Generation particles form atoms or molecules IF...?, higis
  • Re: Can 2nd Generation particles form atoms or molecules IF...?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Can 2nd Generation particles form atoms or molecules IF...?, higis
• Real science or magic trick, jmcphee888
  • Re: Real science or magic trick, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Real science or magic trick, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Real science or magic trick, tadchem
    • Re: Real science or magic trick, nottoo
    • Re: Real science or magic trick, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Real science or magic trick, tadchem
  • Re: Real science or magic trick, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 233.7: University of Michigan Comes to the Rescue, OsherD
• ATTENTION! APPEAL FOR KIND DONATION FOR EFFECTED FROM INTETIONAL CANCER PATIENT ADMITTED IN PULMONIC MULTI SPECIALITY HOSPITAL, anxious person
• dihydrogen monoxide sprayed onto Indian students, Zodness
  • Re: dihydrogen monoxide sprayed onto Indian students, Randy Poe
    • Re: dihydrogen monoxide sprayed onto Indian students, tadchem
      • Re: dihydrogen monoxide sprayed onto Indian students, Androcles
  • Re: dihydrogen monoxide sprayed onto Indian students, Puppet_Sock
• Quantum Gravity 233.6: Eliminating "Trends" in 233.5, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 233.5: Are 2, 3, 5 Key Because They are the Smallest Primes?, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.5: Are 2, 3, 5 Key Because They are the Smallest Primes?, Zodness
    • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.5: Are 2, 3, 5 Key Because They are the Smallest Primes?, OsherD
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", Nemy
  • Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?", HardySpicer
• Re: Acceleration slows time, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• MySpace website for physicians and analysts, vincent64@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 233.4: The Factor 5/3 in Unification, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.4: The Factor 5/3 in Unification, OsherD
• Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, nospam
  • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, wabehtdieh
    • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Dave Typinski
    • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, nottoo
    • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Dave Typinski
      • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, nottoo
  • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Androcles
  • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, srp2inc
    • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Greg Neill
  • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Dave Typinski
  • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Peter Fairbrother
  • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, tadchem
    • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Dave Typinski
      • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, tadchem
      • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Androcles
      • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Dave Typinski
      • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Ballistic entry into circular orbit?, Dave Typinski
• Turner's "Rocket and Spacecraft Propulsion", hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 233.3: Correspondence of 1/sqrt(n) to sqrt(n), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.3: Correspondence of 1/sqrt(n) to sqrt(n), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.3: Correspondence of 1/sqrt(n) to sqrt(n), Zodness
• Antineutrinos sniff out signs of nuclear-bomb making, Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 233.2: 26 Dimensional Bosonic String Theory, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.2: 26 Dimensional Bosonic String Theory, Zodness
    • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.2: 26 Dimensional Bosonic String Theory, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 233.1: Reminder of Where {2, 4, 5} Came From in M-Theory, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 233.1: Reminder of Where {2, 4, 5} Came From in M-Theory, Zodness
• A very simple question, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A very simple question, STUARTe
    • Re: A very simple question, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A very simple question, STUARTe
      • Re: A very simple question, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A very simple question, Sue...
      • Re: A very simple question, srp2inc
      • Re: A very simple question, tadchem
      • Re: A very simple question, srp2inc
      • Re: A very simple question, Eric Gisse
      • Re: A very simple question, STUARTe
      • Re: A very simple question, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A very simple question, Sam Wormley
  • Re: A very simple question, Uncle Al
    • Re: A very simple question, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A very simple question, PD
• God, kurtstocklmeir
• Laser Hair Removal: A Basic Understanding, jeckychai
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Laser Hair Removal: A Basic Understanding, uri
    • Re: Laser Hair Removal: A Basic Understanding, Benj
    • Re: Laser Hair Removal: A Basic Understanding, Randy Poe
• Re: Gravity acceleration and deceleration, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Did Jesus Have Sex ????, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Did Jesus Have Sex ????, nottoo
    • Re: Did Jesus Have Sex ????, Zilla
  • Re: Did Jesus Have Sex ????, tadchem
    • Re: Did Jesus Have Sex ????, Androcles
      • Re: Did Jesus Have Sex ????, tadchem
      • Re: Did Jesus Have Sex ????, Androcles
      • Re: Did Jesus Have Sex ????, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, wabehtdieh
  • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, coltonhines
    • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, wabehtdieh
      • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, coltonhines
    • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, nottoo
      • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, coltonhines
      • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, Benj
      • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, OsherD
      • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, Benj
      • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, HardySpicer
      • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, Benj
      • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, nottoo
      • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, Benj
  • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, Paul Cardinale
    • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, Sue...
  • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, Phil Cartwright
  • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts, Tom Potter
    • Periodic motion towards a heat sink., Jeff▲Relf
    • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts Tuning Problem, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Why Aliens cannot hear our old radio broadcasts Tuning Problem, OsherD
• Ruling party rebel lays down his challenge to ageing Mugabe, ayaz
  • Re: Ruling party rebel lays down his challenge to ageing Mugabe, Zodness
• Beware the Ides of March, ayaz
  • Re: Beware the Ides of March, Zodness
• Exclusive: Interview with Makoni, ayaz
  • Re: Exclusive: Interview with Makoni, Zodness
• Zimbabwe Opposition Faction In Alliance With ZANU-PF Rebel Makoni, ayaz
  • Re: Zimbabwe Opposition Faction In Alliance With ZANU-PF Rebel Makoni, Zodness
• US to accidently shoot down ISS?, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: US to accidently shoot down ISS?, Uncle Al
    • Re: US to accidently shoot down ISS?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: US to accidently shoot down ISS?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Unification of the general theory of the relativity and of the quantum mechanics, Q_Gravity
  • Re: Unification of the general theory of the relativity and of the quantum mechanics, Igor
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Nemy
  • Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets", Robert J. Kolker
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Nemy
  • Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Robert J. Kolker
• Work = energy?, Peter