Re: Curing Einstein's Disease (is Copyrighted)
- From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:09:01 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 31, 10:03 am, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 29, 8:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 28, 10:01 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 25, 7:59 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 23, 3:13 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 23, 10:53 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 22, 9:29 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 21, 6:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 21, 8:26 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 21, 6:51 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[extractions of letters to Lisa Randall, Lawrence Krauss, and the
provost of Ohio State]
Congratulations. By explaining that, via your training as an architect
and your position as a free thinker, you've been able to set physics
on the right path, you've firmly established yourself as not only a
crank, but a crank with a lot of free time on your hands to write
letters that will go *directly* into the trash can.
PD: There you go--attacking the messenger, when you have totally
failed to attack the message. But at least I've got you reading what
I reply. If you could just learn to comprehend what you read, maybe
there would be hope for you. -- NoEinstein --
If there was content in the message, then it would be possible to
address the message. However, in all the letters you've sent, the only
thing that passes for content is a declaration *that* you've done some
work of interest, without submitting the work you've done.
The only example of the work you've done is what you sent me in an
email, and you'll recall that in the first few paragraphs we uncovered
a number of demonstrable errors, and we had yet to embark on the
remainder of that work. I'm more than willing to address the message,
but YOU DON'T SHOW IT TO ANYBODY. All you do is tell people that you
have something to show them and invite them to your house. And you
wonder why that gets ignored?
If you've got a message, then lay it ALL OUT THERE. If you are gutless
and don't want to do that, then at least admit that to yourself.
It's a pitiful messenger who
1) doesn't even show up at the addressee's door, and instead insists
that the addressee needs to come to the messenger
2) doesn't bother giving the message
As a messenger, you're fired. Try another job.
PD- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Dear PD: Where is it written that I must deliver my messages to you?
You choose to deliver your messages here, which is a forum in which it
is implicit that you are delivering your messages to all who view the
newsgroup. If that wasn't your intention, then stop posting here and
in other public forums. You may find that 1-on-1 communication or in
fact 1-on-none communication is more what you had in mind, and there
are certainly better ways of doing that than delivering messages to a
public newsgroup. Heck, create a *private* newsgroup, where membership
is controlled by you. You can do that, you know. I'd be happy to leave
you alone if you only posted there.
And why would I invite you to attack my message, when you haven't
shown any qualifications in any area of science? If you can, levitate
yourself to the posts of others. No stone-head like you will change
my, or anyone's. ideas about anything. -- NoEinstein ---- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
PD: No. You choose to get your messages out of my mailbox. --
NoEinstein --- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Actually, I found your messages in my mailbox, which is what we were
slowly going over, pointing out the mistakes in just about every
second sentence. Remember?
Now, since you also post here, which is a public forum, and then you
complain about not being able to control who responds to your posts in
this public forum, I wonder whether you have any idea what you're
trying to accomplish, except possibly ameliorate your frustration at
being ignored. If you continue to act the fool in a public place, I
can guarantee you won't be ignored -- but perhaps derision and
giggling is not the satisfactory antidote for being ignored you had in
mind.
PD- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Dear PD: There is one person I'd really LOVE to be ignored by--YOU!
Haahahaha -- NoEinstein --
Since he's the one person who keeps actually pointing
out the specific differences between physics and what you
write, I'm not surprised.
- Randy- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Randy: Status quo physics, is that lazy, never been competently
checked, stuff. My physics is neither of those. -- NoEinstein --
.
- Prev by Date: Re: When one is fully informed, he knows time is a spatial dimension.
- Next by Date: Re: Curing Einstein's Disease (is Copyrighted)
- Previous by thread: Re: Curing Einstein's Disease (is Copyrighted)
- Next by thread: Re: Curing Einstein's Disease (is Copyrighted)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
