Re: our science replaced by their journalism
- From: Matthew Lybanon <lybanon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:47:28 -0600
In article
<4cbb4719-fbad-4a3b-9b9c-01d4a1f76ebc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx" <gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hello,
I have figured out a number of awkward magnetic effects. I don't want
to bother anyone with the details. I was just curious why people
refuse to even look at perpetual motion. Sure you can claim nothing of
the kind exists. Scientifically you have not begun to look in favor of
this journalism. You have nothing to back up this claim as non of you
have ever bothered to look into the topic in favor there of.
I don't have to travel around the world to confirm that the world isn't
flat. Similarly, there are very solid theoretical reasons for believing
that perpetual motion is impossible. You don't agree? Some
well-established scientific ideas have been displaced before. Prove
that you are right and "they" are wrong. Build a REAL perpetual
machine, and demonstrate unambiguously that it really works. The
scientists you disdain will honor you.
Otherwise, you are just wasting people's time with your essays.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: our science replaced by their journalism
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: our science replaced by their journalism
- References:
- our science replaced by their journalism
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- our science replaced by their journalism
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Gravity 230.5: Negative Absolute Resistance
- Next by Date: Re: Why does the nano use pistons instead of a sliding vane ?
- Previous by thread: Re: our science replaced by their journalism
- Next by thread: Re: our science replaced by their journalism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
