Cleaning Away Einstein's Mishmash (is Copyrighted.)

The WEB based book seller, Alibris, is currently listing
approximately 458 separate books—both new and used—on the subject of
Albert Einstein. That same company lists only 175 books on the
subject of Sir Isaac Newton. From these numbers one could conclude
either that Einstein is the more important figure in science, or he is
the more demanding figure to try to explain. Not surprisingly, it is
the latter reason why so much has been written. It seems that
“understanding Einstein” is the badge-of-glory for the pseudo
intellectuals in science and in academia. But be it known: “As a
rule, the more times that something necessitates being explained, the
less likely it is that the explanations being given are correct.”
Einstein’s special relativity equation, E=mc^2, is known by
millions, but it is understood by perhaps a few thousand in all of its
ramifications. Most people don’t know that the majority of the
“predictions” of Einstein that purport to uphold his intellectual
greatness, result from a factor beta that is a divisor under E=mc^2.
A mentor of Einstein, H. A. Lorentz, and a mathematician named
Fitzgerald, separately, developed the same equation, beta?= (1 - v^2 /
c^2) ^1/2. As a divisor, beta ?is very close to value 1 for all
velocities normally encountered on Earth. When an object’s velocity
approaches the assumed maximum velocity of light, ‘c’, beta becomes
tiny, and approaches zero at velocity ‘c’. Schoolboys know that when
a divisor gets very small, the number that results from the division
gets very large. Those same schoolboys were likely most impressed
that so simple looking an equation as E=mc^2 could contain so many
‘insights’ into how the Universe functions. But they would be less
impressed to learn that Einstein copied E=mc^2 from a man named
Coriolis, and copied the divisor, beta, from Lorentz-Fitzgerald.
Einstein explained simple things in minutiae. By so doing he
seemed to be claiming to be the ‘author’ of observations in nature, as
if those existed just because he decided to explain them in such
elemental ways. Example: When Einstein realized that observers at
different locations witness events differently, he was quick to claim
such natural occurrence as his very own ‘principle of relativity’!
Since people see things differently, then, nothing is truthful apart
from one’s point of view. That one concept liberated Einstein to
concoct his own pet explanations for how nature functions. Now, no
one can question him, because there is no truth but what he says is
the truth!
Einstein was wont to describe ‘relativity’ observations in such
elemental and boring detail that he seemed to have assumed that no one
before him was smart enough to see, to have seen, or to accept the
obvious. Listening to the condescending harangues of such a pedant
would have been an insult to most reasonable men. But those who
wrinkled their brows and scratched their heads in wonder of the man,
and didn’t get up and walk out, became silent assenters to everything
that he said…
One of my employers would sometimes preface his statements with:
“Would you believe… ?” What followed, quickly, were statements of his
experience or of some truth or fiction. But if you didn’t ‘call him’
on what he just said, then, you were giving your tacit agreement to
the truthfulness of his words, or you were showing him that you
weren’t knowledgeable enough to call him to task. When Einstein’s
audiences stayed in their seats and did not (or could not) call him to
task when he said untruths… they, thereby, were convincing him that he
was above intellectual reproach. Now, Einstein could squeeze in more
of his pet untruths, about those other things that he had ‘reasoned’
to be so. The man mixed his truths with untruths so freely, that
minds would reel to begin to know where to challenge the man.
Seldom was Einstein inclined to step back and question his own
assessments, nor, was he inclined to allow others to question them.
The man said most things with a disarming god-like certainty. But no
course in logic or in deductive and inductive reasoning would find him
making a passing grade. Einstein used “his” ‘principle of relativity’
and “his” ever-changing ‘frame of reference’, to help substantiate the
endless stream of his absurd notions and explanations.
Why did Einstein err?

(1.) He reasoned in the language of equations, and seldom if ever
verified anything by actually doing elementary math.

(2.) He embraced some unproven ‘law of the propagation of light’
advanced by Maxwell and others, that seemed to say that the velocity
of light “in vacuo” is unchanging. Such error caused Einstein to
believe wrongly: “Observations of events happening on a railroad
embankment cannot be correctly timed and measured from a moving train
adjacent to that same embankment.”

(3.) He was gullible to accept the notions of Lorentz-FitzGerald that
all matter, regardless of its composition, contracts identically in
the direction of motion. Einstein and those men—not being engineers—
understood absolutely nothing about the strengths of the materials
that they theorized to be made to contract by velocity. Neither did
they know that strengths of materials depend not just on the material
types, but on the geometries and the qualities of the materials. Nor
did Einstein and those men have the mental wherewithal to realize the
easily observed consequences of there being contractions of matter
caused by velocity alone. To wit: Rocket ships would turn sideways in
space in response to the compression purported to be caused by
velocity. And objects like paper clips lying on your desk would turn
to all angles during the day and night as the Earth’s velocity vector
changes as it rotates on its axis, and orbits the Sun. Einstein knew
so little about nature and engineering, that he thought that matter
would remain contracted at any uniform velocity, without its being
able to rebound elastically, till the velocity is reduced. According
to Einstein: If a compression was caused by velocity, it STAYED
compressed! The man wrote purported laws of nature; but never
observed nature!

(4.) He did not have the basic understanding of light, nor the ability
to analyze spatial relationships [except his own contrived ones] well
enough to understand how the Fizeau interferometer experiment, nor the
Michelson-Morley interferometer experiment functioned. He should have
realized that the results of the latter experiment were
counterintuitive, and discovered the error in its design—as I have
done. Rather, Einstein took it as his mantra that reasoning
counterintuitive things was his calling; and he did that so well!
“Einstein, single handedly, made stupidity a virtue and rational
thought a disease.”

(5.) Einstein’s thoughts were not grounded in truths; rather they
were his imagined truths or delusions. He had schizophrenia. Except
for his outward studiousness, he never should have been listened to,
nor taken seriously in any regard.

(6.) Einstein was dishonest. His “prediction” of the angle of
bending of light in the 1919 solar eclipse did not, and could not have
resulted from his general theory of relativity. He extrapolated
observed optical bending evident in the changed apparent locations of
the moons of Jupiter that re appear sooner. He estimated the larger
angle based on the greater mass and diameter of the Sun. And his
calculations used Newton’s Law of Gravitation, not his own theories.
It was Einstein’s lifelong jealousy of Newton that lead him to try to
redefine gravity in the first place.

(7.) He drew a close parallel between acceleration and the force of
gravity. But neither he, nor Coriolis—from whom he copied his E=mc^2 —
knew the correct definition of the acceleration of gravity, ‘g’, which
is: 32.174 feet per second EACH second. If Einstein had known that
acceleration is a linear, or additive, increase in the velocity of an
object, NOT an exponential increase, then he never would have taught:
“There isn‘t enough energy in the entire Universe to cause even a
speck of matter to travel to the velocity of light”.

(8.) When he couldn’t understand something (which was quite
frequently) Einstein invented something else that approximated
observations. His general theory of relativity defines gravity as
just warped space-time, wherein, objects accelerate along his
concocted world lines. Since the inertial effects of acceleration
feel like gravity, then, Einstein says that acceleration is gravity!
(sic)

(9.) Einstein had a huge misunderstanding of the difference between…
“seems like” and “is”. He often postulated… If so-and-so is true, and
if such-and-such is also true, then, all-in-all must be absolutely
true! But from that point on, when Einstein referred to “all-in-all“,
he never again mentioned that his speculative conclusion derived from
two very iffy and unproven suppositions! That is like saying: The
cause is the result of the observed effects!

(10.) The subjects that Einstein talked about didn’t make one wit of
difference to the ordinary people of his day. If light can’t go
faster than ‘c’, who cared? But I care, today! Einstein has limited
mankind, forever, to be bound to live on just a planet that revolves
around the Sun. But had I been a contemporary of his, he would not
have pulled-the-wool-over-so-many-eyes.

Now, all of the “predictions” by Einstein that had purported to
confirm his theories can be correctly explained by the actual
existence of a pervasive energy form called ether! Erroneously, the
existence of ether had been ‘disproved’ by the 1887 Michelson-Morley
interferometer experiment… that Einstein had so blindly accepted as
being conclusive. For a supposed scientist, Einstein knew absolutely
nothing about the Scientific Method… For him, truth was whatever he
could convince you to believe.
Books will continue to be written about Einstein, but I hope some
of them will address the psychology that was used by that man, so that
never again will an entire scientific discipline be so duped away from
the truth.
__________

Other posts of mine beginning in 2007:

Where Angels Fear to Fall
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e...
Last Nails in Einstein's Coffin
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thre...
Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316...
An Einstein Disproof for Dummies
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63...
Another look at Einstein
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721...
Three Problems for Math and Science
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f30aab43c49c?hl=en
Matter from Thin Air
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe3946dfc0c31/1f1872476bc6ca90?hl=en#1f1872476bc6ca90
Curing Einstein’s Disease
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e866e0d87562/f5f848ad8aba67da?hl=en#f5f848ad8aba67da
Replicating NoEinstein’s Invalidation of M-M
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/t/ac6fcd9b4e8112ed?hl=en
NC Buries Head in Sand to Einstein Disproofs
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ca7733d51c0d6ec0/d68a772ab0b32c8f?hl=en#d68a772ab0b32c8f
NC Governor Should Resign Over Science
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/2e892e00156d4d92?hl=en#
Replicating NoEinstein’s Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f9852639d5d9e1/dcb2a1511b7b2603?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#dcb2a1511b7b2603

Respectfully submitted, — NoEinstein —
__________
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: GPS GR Correction Myth.
    ... we shall, however, find in what follows, that the velocity ... It denies an axiom, the Principle of Relativity. ... "Albert Einstein. ... THERE is hardly a simpler law in physics than that according ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: What causes time dilation?
    ... |> | Modern relativity theory does not have this foundation. ... |> the velocity of light added to the velocity of the source. ... [Restore of other argument against the idiot Einstein, ... Einstein, however, was not a mathematician. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: What causes time dilation?
    ... |> | Modern relativity theory does not have this foundation. ... |> the velocity of light added to the velocity of the source. ... [Restore of other argument against the idiot Einstein, ... Einstein, however, was not a mathematician. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?
    ... Einstein was a THEORETICAL ... The speeds are c-v and c+v. ... |> "It follows, further, that the velocity of light c cannot be altered by ... A star at the centre of a sphere will have a finite amount of energy, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relativity as an axiomatic system
    ... As you say, one man says the velocity of light is source independent, ... Ask anyone what they know about Einstein ... it would have to be time dilation in y compared to x. ... > The reason such an absurdity was accepted was because Physicists were ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)