Re: Curing Einstein's Disease (is Copyrighted)


"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e47cde8d-2ca5-4abd-a4f6-472270744909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 31, 8:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 31, 4:01 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



> > > > It's more attention than he otherwise gets. I wonder what he'd do
> > > > if
> > > > the both of us stopped replying all together - do you think he'd
> > > > just
> > > > keep populating threads in reply to himself like he seems to be
> > > > doing
> > > > now, or do you think he'd go away? Eric

> > > Dear Eric: Some of my "added" replies to my own post are because
> > > Google, apparently, limits the number of posts by one person--at
> > > one
> > > time--to four. And those replies of mine contain detailed
> > > descriptions of my
> > > Einstein disproofs. If you would read each of them, you might
> > > could
> > > learn some truths!

> > Read what, you babbling endlessly about Coriolis even though he died
> > a
> > solid 70 years before relativity was discovered?

"Einstein's" relativity gets treated like: Laws of Nature by many
physicists--as you probably agree. But true Laws of Nature have
existed since creation. So, Einstein can't lay claim to relativity,
if such is a law of nature. But relativity is just the concocted
ideas of a moron who had even poorer spatial visualization skills than
you (as for finding the side angle of a hemispherical pyramid).

<Einstein> revolutionized statistical mechanics, invented special
and general relativity, and formed not only the _foundations_ of
quantum mechanics..

It is interesting to see that Eric Gisse, like many people,
has been conditioned to give Einstein credit for the works of others.

It should be pointed out that Maxwell was the Father of Dimensional
Analysis,
the standard that ALL physics' models MUST conform to,

and note that Einstein co-opted Bose Statistics in 1926
in order to lump causes and effects in with things,
in order to get on board the "Wave Mechanics Express",
after de Broglie's famous 1924 paper that equated waves to matter.
(Bose met de Broglie's in 1924 and Einstein in October 1925.)

and that Fermi Statistics, also in 1926,
had to be used to decouple causes and effects from things,

and that both Bose Statistics and Fermi Statistics
are nominal variations of Maxwell's statistics.

And of course, Maxwell's famous Equations
were the model that gave us
modern electronics, chemistry, and communications.

Also note that Maxwell was the first to observe that
the newly emerging field of statistics would have to be used
to model phenomena, and this and Maxwell's Statistics
lead to Quantum Mechanics.

The following paragraph was lifted from Maxwell's "Matter and Motion".

Quote
===========

All our knowledge, both of time and place, is essentially relative.
<Snip>
The difference between one event and another
does not depend on the mere difference of the times or the places at which
they occur,
but only on differences in the nature, configuration, or motion of the
bodies concerned.

It follows from this, that if an event has occurred at a given time and
place
it is possible for an event exactly similar to occur at any other time and
place.

There is another maxim which must not be confounded with that quoted at the
beginning of this article, which asserts
"That like causes produce like effects."

This is only true when small variations in the initial circumstances produce
only small variations in the final state of the system.
<snip> only in so far as stability subsists that principles of natural law
can be formulated :

We may perhaps say that the observable regularities of nature belong to
statistical molecular phenomena which have settled down into permanent
stable conditions.
=========
Unquote

It is sad that so many people have been brainwashed
to worship Einstein, and to parrot his mistakes
such as his idea that energy is quanta,
( Quanta of *action* is conveyed between a cause and an effect.)
and his babble such as General Relativity,
an obviously flawed auguring model of reality,
that leaves no room for sentient man in the picture.

--
Tom Potter

http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com
http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians
    ... 'Nature' likes different frames of reference, ... relative and third party, as Einstein thought. ... relativity - and help to relieve the thread poster of his money, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Unified Field, Special Relativity
    ... A Discussion of Special Relativity ... scientists will be found turning back to Einstein again ... requires one to violate the dictates of ‘simple common sense'. ... takes for the beam of light to travel from clock ‘a' to clock ‘b' (Tb- ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Unified Field, Special Relativity
    ... A Discussion of Special Relativity ... scientists will be found turning back to Einstein again ... requires one to violate the dictates of ‘simple common sense'. ... takes for the beam of light to travel from clock ‘a' to clock ‘b' (Tb- ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity
    ... quantisation of an energy matter neither along the nature, ... A Discussion of Special Relativity ... scientists will be found turning back to Einstein again ... takes for the beam of light to travel from clock 'a' to clock 'b' (Tb- ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
    ... "The Einstein Hoax", and its related texts, were written ... tenets on "Faith" since it/they cannot be proven, ... rigor on theoretical physicists as we do on Land Surveyors. ... General Relativity has allegedly replaced Newtonian ...
    (sci.physics)