Re: Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
- From: Phil Cartwright <pcartw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:09:25 -0500
Sam Wormley wrote:
> [rest is superfluous]Gravity is not force, remember?
Debatable. (String theory predicts a graviton particle.)
I don't think string theory predicts a graviton particle.
Actually, everything in your post after "I don't think" seems to be superfluous. :)
Google "string theory graviton". Pay particular attention to http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/05/why-are-there-gravitons-in-string.html but the introductory material, Wikipedia links, and similar are also worth examining. Regardless, it's well known in theoretical-physics circles that string theories have gravitons as surely as stray cats have fleas.
--
There's only four things you can be certain of: taxes, change, spam, and death.
.
- References:
- Re: Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
- From: Phil Cartwright
- Re: Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
- From: dlzc
- Re: Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
- From: Phil Cartwright
- Re: Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
- Prev by Date: Re: Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
- Next by Date: Re: FYI - Long Term Future of GPS
- Previous by thread: Re: Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
- Next by thread: Re: Bosons and force; the Feynman diagram
- Index(es):