Re: Sunspots
- From: srp2inc@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:40:03 -0800 (PST)
On 9 fév, 19:29, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is exciting to me too Andre.
It's like a bent Occam's razor, should we presume
a Sunspot dynamics solution based entirely on the
interior dynamics of the Sun, or shall we include
exterior input dynamics, such as Sunmeteors?
I think that both should be investigated further.
Particularly since my own model raises heavy doubts
regarding the proton-proton fusion hypothesized by Gamow
and that has been assumed for the past 70 years to fuel
fusion in stars, but cannot be experimentally re-produced
due to the insurmountable electrostatic repulsion between
protons at any pressure.
A repulsion that is hypothetically deemed
surmountable in the center of stars due to the pressure
and temperature but that could never be proven experimentally
in any of the experimental attempts at high pressure fusion
of Hydrogen.
In fact, the only successful cases of hydrogen fusion on
Earth (Hydrogen bomb explosions) involved massive
quantities of neutrons produced by the fission detonator.
My own model seems to indicate massive production of
both protons and neutrons in the center of stars.
We know that fusion is easy when both neutrons and protons
are involved.
On Feb 9, 3:31 pm, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9 fév, 16:28, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Andre
On Feb 9, 5:15 am, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9 fév, 06:53, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sunspots.
Sunspots affect climate and therefore evolution.
I'll try to connect sunspots to the Sun passing through
spurious galatic arms composed of invisible debris.
I estimate the probability of a meteor striking a mass is
simplistcally proportional to it's Area*Mass.
Working the proportion of Solar meteors/Earth meteors,
in round figures gives using,
Sun dia=100*Earth diameter
Sun Area =10^4 Earth Area
Mass = 3*10^5 Earth mass
Sun Strikes = 3*10^9 Earth Strikes.
I conjecture a Sunmeteor Strike appears as a Sunspot,
and a metallic Sunmeteor due to high speed of strike
would react with the solar magnetic field, to create a
very large induction current, and localized magnetic
field, characteristic of Sunspots.
Interesting idea. Never thought of that.
It's based on the motion of a conductor in magnetic
field (as I know you have an expert knowledge on).
Still it's worth considering what a 100 ton chunk of
metal moving at >600 km/sec, threw the solar
magnetic field on it's surface would do.
Now that you cooked up the idea, this makes more and
more sense to me too.
Have to think.
I like the word "cooked",
Unintended pun, but yes, I like it too.
the approaching *metallic*
Sunmeteor will *likely* go molten then gaseous,
as it contacts the Solar photosphere.
So you end up with a kind of *shot gun* hitting the
Sun...wow.
Definitely worth exploring.
May not pan out, but who knows?
In perspective, a large meteor that strikes the Earth every
100 million years will strike the Sun 30 times per year.
The solar Sunspot cycle is a known average, with ~11 yr
averages betweens maximums, yet large rogue sunspots
may occur even at the minimums of that cycle, and I think
it's exceptionally difficult to explain that and the Maunder
Minimum, based on solar internal dynamics, so therefore
we look for exterior causes.
We're fairly certain the Milkway is a Barred Galaxy, and
we can only see those bars well condensed to form stars,
however many fingers of invisible bars may also exist.
While complex, these fingers appear to be organized in
Saturn's Rings for a micro example.
So as the Solar System revolves around the galaxy it will
periodically intersect these debris fingers.
This I have already thought about.
You must consider however that the Solar System's orbit
is tilted by a rather wide angle of about 30 degrees with
respect to the galactic ecliptic. The galactic "year" lasts
somewhere between 220 and 250 million years and
we apparently currently are located about 15 million
years from coming perigalacticon.
So we must have last passed the high density region
about 60 to 80 millions years ago, and next shot
should occur in about 100 million years or so.
Right! I've been trying to get good historical and
astronomical data on that, it's get's kind of fuzzy.
Normal since the idea was never explored nor correlated
by anybody.
Not that I've been able to find out about yet.
I'm organizing an inform group on the subject.
Lots of work ahead.
Yes, it's exceedingly eclectic, involving many fields.
Guess we'll hear from you no this eventually then.
Looking forward to more from you.
I have been trying to correlate the passages through
the dense regions with prehistoric large meteor collisions.
Yes that and also a contribution of increased (or
decreased) Sunmeteor's, creating variations in
solar radiance.
Absolutely.
Can't put much time on the issue though
You sound like you're trying to think things
through too, good to hear.
Yes. After finishing integrating at the foundation
(job done) my attention has been drifting to
the consequences at the macro level.
Still observing.
Regards
André Michaud
It's that Twilight Zone between Conjecture and
Science, where a Paradigm can shift and Man
will forever be Enlightened.
You bet
Regards
André Michaud
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sunspots
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Sunspots
- References:
- Sunspots
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Sunspots
- From: srp2inc
- Re: Sunspots
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Sunspots
- From: srp2inc
- Re: Sunspots
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Sunspots
- Prev by Date: Re: The Universe is made from two "things".
- Next by Date: Instrinsically, objectively, time is a spatial dimension.
- Previous by thread: Re: Sunspots
- Next by thread: Re: Sunspots
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|