Re: Sunspots

On 11 fév, 15:25, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 11, 2:42 pm, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:



On 11 fév, 13:35, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 11, 1:16 pm, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 11 fév, 13:02, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 11, 12:47 pm, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

As for neutrino detection, the quantities coming
to us identifiable (if at all) as coming from the sun, can
only be infinetesimal compared to those produced from
muon decay from cosmic ray origin in our very
atmosphere.

That's my opinion. (I may be wrong, of course, as you
will of course flatly assert)

What I assert is that you have nothing even approximately
resembling a number to back up this assertion.

What I have is open-minded understanding.

What I understand is that you can't make out even a
50 feet thick curtain of trees burning burning 500 feet
away if it is standing behind a close by 50 foot thick
curtain of burning trees.

Solar neutrino flux: 50 billion per square meter per second.
Cosmic ray flux: 1 per square meter per second.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_rays

I'd say your analogy is defective. The close-in
fire is 1/50-billionth of the far away fire.

- Randy

I know the estimates. All hypothetical and based on
Gamow's hypothesis, which cannot be reproduced
in labs, which supposes a natural and easily reached
proton decay rate with pressure that never was
confirmed nor even hinted at in labs.

My model suggests a much simpler process not
requiring this improbable (since it can't be reproduced
in labs) proton decay rate. A much more natural
process in fact that will one day mark the end of
balistic space flight and the advent of powered
space flight.

And your model fits the data you made up,

Not at all. The model remains to be confirmed.

so it's not a problem that it doesn't match up with
real-world measurements.

But it does.

Because what does physics have to do with modeling
what actually happens, right?

What you are doing is fitting the data to your model.

The opposite needs to be done.

By the way, did you see the neutrino image of the
sun that Sam posted? From all those neutrinos that
can't be seen because they're swamped by the
neutrinos bombarding us from the entire sky?

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap980605.html

What a joke. I could retrieve fine pictures of quarks
also that have been made up with the same type
of paint programs. Anyone can cook up this
sort of *** and then assert that it is an actual
picture of an angel wing feather.

André Michaud
.

Quantcast