Internal Mass-Energy vs Higgs Field
- From: Zilla <zillazip82@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:52:43 -0800 (PST)
Let's say the Higgs field were real and one day it got turned
off. What would happen to Porat 120 lbs weight (which is
connected to his mass plus our earth's gravity)? Would he
became 0 lb and float? No. The rest masses of the
constituent quarks (approx. 0.005 and 0.010 GeV/c2 for
the up and down quarks respectively) which could be
attributed to the Higgs field comprise only about one
percent of the masses of the protons and neutrons
(0.938 and 0.940 GeV/c2 respectively). The remainder
of the proton and neutron masses would have to be
attributed to contributions from the gluon field strong
interaction energies plus smaller electromagnetic
and weak fields contributions which would not be
affected by a Higgs field. Therefore Porat weight without
the Higgs field would be 118.8 lbs. Not zero. So why
should the universe took the trouble to introduce Higgs
field at every point in space to contribute to only small
rest masses to fermions and bosons?
I assume internal mass energy is independent to higgs
field. Meaning without the Higgs. Special Relativity internal
mass energy would work just the same.
Now couldn't internal mass energy alone and mechanisms
like it give masses to the fermions and bosons? Let's
say the weak gauge Boson W+ and W- are rotating or
have internal dynamics causing mass to appear due to
internal mass energy and Special Relativity. It can
become massive without the Higgs.
Of course this may appear not true. I was wondering
if there is arvix paper like this that illustrate how the
standard model particles can have masses without the
higgs. Anyone?
Z.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: physics formulary
- Next by Date: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 15 Feb 08, Washington, DC
- Previous by thread: Bernouli rule and free energy
- Next by thread: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 15 Feb 08, Washington, DC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
