Sunspots II.
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:21:25 -0800 (PST)
My intent here is to evolve the original conjecture
given in to Sunspots II,
In Sunspots I, below, a few minor corrections
have been suggested by esteemed colleagues
and have been ordered into the improved...
Sunspots II
Sunspots affect climate and therefore evolution.
I'll try to connect sunspots to the Sun passing through
galactic arms composed of invisible debris.
I estimate the probability of a meteor striking a mass is
simplistically proportional to it's Area*Mass.
Working the proportion of Solar meteors/Earth meteors,
in round figures gives using,
Sun dia=100*Earth diameter
Sun Area =10^4 Earth Area
Mass = 3*10^5 Earth mass
Sun Strikes = 3*10^9 Earth Strikes.
Our conjecture is a Sunmeteor Strike appears as a
Sunspot, and a metallic Sunmeteor due to high speed
of strike would react with the solar magnetic field, to
create a very large induction current, and localized
magnetic field, characteristic of Sunspots.
In perspective, a large meteor that strikes the Earth every
100 million years will strike the Sun 30 times per year,
but with a much higher kinetic energy due to escape
velocity differences of Earths surface compared to
the Suns surface.
The solar Sunspot cycle is a known average, with ~11 yr
averages betweens maximums, yet large rogue sunspots
may occur even at the minimums of that cycle, and I think
it's exceptionally difficult to explain that and the Maunder
Minimum, based on solar internal dynamics, so therefore
we look for exterior causes.
We're fairly certain the MilkyWay is a Barred Galaxy, and
we can only see those bars well condensed to form stars,
however many fingers of invisible bars may also exist.
While complex, these fingers appear to be organized in
Saturn's Rings for a micro example and are commonly
termed as "spokes".
As the Solar System revolves around the galaxy it will
periodically intersects these debris fingers.
The debris fingers are evidentally composed of
metallic debris, suggesting a Supernova origin.
A glance at the Crab Nebula confirms this unique
spoking process, which, by observation suggests
a force stronger than simple gravitation, more likely
magnetic forces are involved.
The spoking phenomena is absent in the Ring nebula
as that was likely a nova phenomena that released
gas with no metalic content.
We are close to evolving the conjecture into a theory
with predictive capability able to detail more refined
observational techniques aside from those that have
already confirmed the hypothesis.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sunspots II.
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Sunspots II.
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Sunspots II.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sunspots II.
- Prev by Date: Re: Work = energy?
- Next by Date: Re: Work = energy?
- Previous by thread: Quantum Gravity 233.8: Order of Magnitude 10 and {2, 4, 5}
- Next by thread: Re: Sunspots II.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
