Re: NC Governor Should Resign Over Science
- From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:04:47 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 9, 5:24 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The following letter is the next to the last that I've sent, to date,
to a university regarding my Einstein disproofs. Dr. Fulton is a
forensic chemist, not a physicist. But my files sent to him, and the
following letter, should have gotten his 'wheels turning'--if he has
workable wheels to turn. FIU, a public institution, has rated high
for the 'value' of the education. Folks, the good news is: a FIU
education is cheap; the bad news is that a FIU lacks integrity.
I have a first cousin who got a PhD in atomic physics, there. He now
teaches undergraduate astronomy. Dr. Fulton is concerned with the
chemical analysis of crime scenes. But his knowledge of the "bigger
picture" is the real... crime. -- NoEinstein --
__________
1/24/08
To: Dr. Kenneth Furton, Dean of College of Arts & Sciences
Florida International University
Re: Science, and Crimes in Science
Dear Dean Furton:
If you learned, today, that Einstein's theories of relativity have
been disproved--and conclusively so--would such a revelation affect what
gets taught, and/or researched at FIU in the future? As a good
criminal investigator, you would probably defer answering such a
question until after you have examined 'the evidence'.
One might suppose that considering... 'the evidence' in a subject area
so steeped in controversy, as well as in tradition, would be a most
involved, and long-drawn-out affair. Actually, the disproof of
Einstein is as simple as this one sentence: "NoEinstein, an
independent science researcher, has determined that the 1887 Michelson-
Morley interferometer experiment on which Albert Einstein based both
of his theories of relativity was improperly designed without a
control."
And another single sentence of disproof: "NoEinstein has also
invalidated the 1830 equation of Coriolis: KE = 1/2 mv^2, which Einstein
used as the model for his E = mc^2, and which wrongly implies that the
kinetic energy of accelerating masses increases exponentially, rather
than linearly--as NoEinstein has proved both mathematically and
experimentally.
And a two sentence disproof: "Additionally, NoEinstein invalidates
Einstein by correcting a three hundred year old mistake in the
definition of acceleration due to gravity, which had been: g = 32.2
feet per second^2. The latter definition wrongly implies that
acceleration is an exponential increase in velocity--as Einstein
naively believed--and has been rewritten by NoEinstein: 32.174 feet per
second EACH second, to show that acceleration is a linear, rather than
an exponential increase in velocity."
Yet another one sentence disproof: "NoEinstein's own correctly
designed interferometer, with a control, easily detects Earth's
movement in the cosmos--something Einstein said would be impossible,
and if it were possible, would invalidate his theories of relativity.
Lastly: "NoEinstein invalidates the so-called Lorentz transformation
responsible for Einstein's 'space-time' variance. Such transformation
was an off-the-cuff explanation for why the Michelson-Morley
experiment had failed. In violation of the SCIENTIFIC METHOD, Lorentz
had accepted the unproven supposition that 'c' is the maximum velocity
of light, and concluded--against common sense and easily observable
truths in nature: 'All matter contracts in the direction of motion due
to velocity according to the equation: Beta = (1 - v^2/c^2)^1/2'. But
NoEinstein has checked that most counterintuitive notion,
mathematically, and found that such equation, nor any of its caveats,
will yield nil results for the Michelson-Morley experiment. Lorentz,
nor Einstein ever checked Lorentz's assumptions, mathematically.
NoEinstein has, also, checked the intuitive assumption: 'Light
velocity varies depending on the velocity of the emitting source, or
the reflecting surface', and found that such intuitive assumption
correctly explains the nil results of the M-M experiment--negating
space-time variance as a... "law of nature".
In the time it has taken you to read the above, you now know the nuts
and bolts of my broad and conclusive disproofs of Einstein. Yours is
the 20th university in the USA that I have contacted. Devastating?
Yes! It's devastating to the cultures in our universities that they
place a greater importance on maintaining the status quo than they do
on teaching truths. Doing that same thing may seem like an easy 'out'
for you. Via copy of this I am apprising Ronald Berkman of my
findings, and I am forwarding a copy to the Miami Herald newspaper.
Those guys, and you and Ron will get to decide whether you favor
ignorance over truths. The decision shouldn't be a difficult one.
Make it correctly, and Florida International University can hold its
head high, while those other universities must lower their heads in
shame. As decisions go, 'this one' is the most important to ever
cross any desk at FIU. May truth and justice prevail.
Very truly yours,
-- NoEinstein -- (actual name used here and above)
The *heads-in-the-sand bad attitudes of NC universities toward seeking
TRUTHS in education, is just the tip of the iceberg, nationally.
[*Also see my similarly titled, earlier post:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ca773...
]
In my nearly seven year odyssey to get my disproofs of Einstein
recognized, the following universities, and one college, have come up
lacking:
1. MIT -- Places more emphasis on 'the form', and the *precedence,
then it does on the simplicity and the elegance of the arguments.
[*i.e.: It requires one to show that what is presented is an evolution
from the status quo, and thus supports the status quo as "the
foundation" of what is allowed to follow.]
2. University of Colorado -- Ditto the above response.
3. Furman University (SC) -- Ditto the above response.
4. University of Chicago -- Beginning in 2007, no response of any kind
to exhaustive appeals to the science head, Robert Fefferman (a
mathematician) and to top administration.
5. Davidson College (NC): No response to several appeals to the
college president, including my offer to demonstrate my X-Y-Z
interferometer.
6. University of NC -- No response of any kind to exhaustive appeals
to the physics department at the main Chapel Hill campus; and to a
computer simulation specialist in modeling scientific events. Later,
there was a token reply from UNC President Erskin Boles, an
acquaintance, who promised to give my materials to an appropriate
person(s). But Boles didn't reply to my follow-ups, nor accept my
offers to demonstrate my X-Y-Z interferometer.
7. Georgia Tech -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive appeals to
the head of the science department (a mathematician), and my
especially strong offers to present my X-Y-Z interferometer at their
convenience.
8. University of Georgia -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive
appeals to the head of the physics department, an Englishman, and my
especially strong offers to present my X-Y-Z interferometer at their
convenience.
9. NC State University -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive
appeals to the head of the physics department, and to a computer
simulation professor; and my especially strong offers to present my X-
Y-Z interferometer at their convenience.
10. University of Virginia -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive
appeals to the head of the physics department, an astronomer; to the
provost, a physicist; and to the university president. And no reply
to my offers to present my X-Y-Z interferometer, at their university,
at their convenience.
11. University of Florida -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive
appeals to the university president, a dentist, and my offers to
present my X-Y-Z interferometer at their convenience.
12. University of Maryland -- A blatant turn down by the university
president of my all or nothing appeal, including my offer to present
my X-Y-Z interferometer at their convenience.
13. Virginia Tech -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive appeals
to the university president. And no reply to my offers to present my
X-Y-Z interferometer, at their university, at their convenience.
14. Cornell University -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive
appeals to a German professor who specializes in audio and other non
destructive testing of materials.
15. Penn State University -- A teacher in the "Gravity Department",
Martin Bojowald, wrote a research paper on: "The Big Bounce". Such
paper relies on Einstein's... "Space doesn't exist near super massive
objects." idea. I informed Bojowald of my Einstein disproofs, and
sent him all of my materials. I requested that he put a caveat
paragraph at the beginning of his, then, not yet published paper
stating that Einstein has been disproved, thereby invalidating the
purpose of his paper... which was financed, in part, by the NSF...
Getting no reply from Bojowald, I wrote to the Dean of the
Graduate School, Eva J. Pell, informing her that obtaining funding for
research projects that are based on false premises is a felony.
Additionally, I informed the university president the same thing. I
then got a reply from the PSU counsel, a Mr. Courtney, Esquire,
informing me that my "rights' had not been violated by anything that
Penn State had done.
Realizing that I had discovered a willingness of PSU to obtain
research funding money, and state money, to knowing teach things that
are untrue, I informed Penn. Governor Edward G. Rendell. I told him
that he is legally obligated to protect the best interests of the
Penn. taxpayers. And I told him that if he did not do so, then he
would be guilty of aiding and abetting felonies. I never heard from
him...
The above scenario with Penn State, and the State of Penn. not
caring that the taxpayers are being cheated, is the same bury-its-head-
in-the-sand negative response that I have gotten from NC Governor Mike
Easley. Easley is apparently willing to CHEAT the NC taxpayers,
because the non-existent news media in NC won't hold him accountable.
They're more interested in the advertising money in their pockets from
new industries being lured to NC--because of the (non existent)
'quality' education, available, there--than they are in the money being
WASTED by the naive citizens of NC on... supposed 'quality' education...
16. Case Western Reserve University (Cleveland, OH) -- I informed
physicist Lawrence Krauss that the M-M experiment, that is in one of
their basements, lacks a CONTROL, and is thus invalid. This
university, periodically, gives a "Michelson-Morley Prize" for
'outstanding' work in science. Stephen Hawking received such award in
2003. I informed Krauss that CWRU would benefit by announcing to the
world my discoveries. I also informed their new lady president, an
attorney, that CWRU would be committing felonies to let students pay
tuitions to "learn" things that are knowing false. And I told the
lady, she would be similarly guilty for not correcting this bad
situation. She did nothing...
17. Wake Forest University (NC) -- After checking that such university
doesn't seem to be "corrupted" by science research grant money from
the NSF, I urged the physics department to confirm my findings. They
did nothing.
18. Appalachian State University (NC) -- Realizing that universities
are willing to be criminal and "teach" falsehoods, I wrote a pointed
letter to the ASU president, and the head of the sciences school. I
informed those men that they had a fiduciary responsibility to teach
only truths, and if they did not, it would be criminal. I sent a copy
of this long, emailed letter to NC Governor Mike Easley, and attached
pivotal articles and files to the governor. Neither ASU nor Gov.
Easley has responded appropriately. Nor have any of the 90% of NC
newspapers that I have twice apprised of those crimes. Like I have
said, Governor Mike Easley should resign, and the heads of all of the
Universities I have mentioned should be fired.
-- NoEinstein --
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NC Governor Should Resign Over Science
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: NC Governor Should Resign Over Science
- Prev by Date: Re: A high school question about Newton's third law for bodies in motion
- Next by Date: Re: equations for inertial simulator
- Previous by thread: Re: NC Governor Should Resign Over Science
- Next by thread: Re: NC Governor Should Resign Over Science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
