Re: Who exactly is Harry C???
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:14:38 -0500
<hhc314@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ecf26c4b-6c0a-4040-b241-71f0c99a8c8c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 25, 10:13 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<hhc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3624e22a-bb39-4e6b-b682-358e97865108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 25, 9:52 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And why does he insist on posting unrelated political
crap to sci.physics, a behavior that is clearly not
condoned by the group charter?
Greig, neither the first nor the last time that this will be done.
Frankly, even as a physicist, I believe that the future leadership
of our nation is far more of immediate importance that any trivial
discussion about Newton, Einstein, or Fermat's Last Theorem.
And everyone else across the planet who reads sci.physics
must suffer the consequences of *your* belief because...?
How about showing a little class by taking your political
posts to a political newsgroup where they will be on topic?
Those with an interest will know where to find it.
Greg, it seems that you are the only posted who has voiced serious
objection to the educational material that I have and intend to
continue posting. Why is that?
It's late in the evening here, and later in most other
places where the readers are. I expect there'll be more
people chiming in eventually.
Are you a Barack Hussen Obama supporter who doesn't like the facade
your hero hides from dashed away with fact, or simply that you are so
in love with physics that you don't want to see any interruption to
the massive stream of quasi-scientific posts that are dumped here on a
daily basis?
Why do you assume that I have any interest in the
political machinations taking place in the U.S.?
This si a physics newsgroup and I'm not in the U.S.
Then too, when was the last time that you tried to help
a mystified student and demonstrated to him how to solve a simple
problem in classical mechanics? I must have missed that when you did.
Yes, you were probably busy cooking up more political
rants, so might have missed those posts. I think that
others here can attest to the fact that I have tried
to contribute positively over the years and have
indeed helped not a few neophytes.
So Greg, If you don't like my posts illuminating Obama for being the
pretender that he is, simply skip over them just as I do with all of
the flake pseudo-science posts. I really have no object to a majority
of posts on this newsgroup that containg nothing but nonsense, because
I simply skip over them. You might consider doing the same this with
my posts that attempt to educate voters on the facts.
This is not a political group. Your posts are off topic.
Just because there's a high background noise it's no
excuse to contribute more. I expect the cranks and
nutters to be oblivious to common sense and to behave
rudely, but it's just mystifying why someone who
otherwise contributes in a sane and postive way would
turn around and behave rudely and disrespectfully when
he gets a political feather up his ass.
Also Greg, unlike the wacko scientific posts, if you ever detect a
factual error on anything that I post, please call it to my attention
and I will try to immediately research your objection and post a
correction. Is that fair enough?
No. You're posting off topic and there's no excuse.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Who exactly is Harry C???
- From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Who exactly is Harry C???
- References:
- Who exactly is Barack Obama???
- From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Who exactly is Harry C???
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Who exactly is Harry C???
- From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Who exactly is Harry C???
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Who exactly is Harry C???
- From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Who exactly is Barack Obama???
- Prev by Date: Re: Nanohydrogenerator Mk II
- Next by Date: Re: optics
- Previous by thread: Re: Who exactly is Harry C???
- Next by thread: Re: Who exactly is Harry C???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|