Re: Barack Obama's history...for those to whom this will be news...

On Feb 25, 10:42 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<hhc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:05ed96c0-8487-4d7d-8963-56e7b80fc7ae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Feb 25, 10:09 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneill...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip political broadcast]

Please stop using sci.physics as your own political
soapbox.  It is not On-Topic, and not supported by the
charter.

What would happen if everyone from around the planet
started critiquing their local politicians here?
There'd be no room left for physics.

Actually Greg, real physics is rarely discussed on sci.physics,
unfortunately.

So post some physics to a physics newsgroup.



So what the heck, why not use it for voter education,

Because there are other newsgroups for that purpose.

since most of
the posts here are from kranks that see Einstein's accomplishments as
merely a fable to be disputed by people who have never actually worked
in any job requiring the application of relativistic corrections to
achieve positive results.

That's just a lame excuse.  Adding to the problem isn't
helping.

I need no excuse for posting, since they are done a a public, albeit
patriotic service.

Please explain the goal of your posts Greg, and why you even bother to
post them. Is is boredom, frustration, or what?

Harry C.

p.s., Greig, if you wish to discuss physics, repond with a real
physics topic that you believe worth discussing, or if you don't
understand the course textbook. I'm pretty good with classical
mechanics, electromagnetic field theory, nuclear, or EE topics. If I
don't have an answer at the top of my head, one of my books at my side
certainly will. Still, please, nothing on cosmology, black holes, n-
dimensional space, or why Einstein was a crackpot. Like most real
physicist, I believe that if something cannot be experimentally
verified, measured, and have dimensions associated with it, it's mere
speculation. Mathematicians speculate, physicists do not.



.

Quantcast