Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition

From: Vandar <vandar69@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:29:08 GMT

Phil Cartwright wrote:

Government Shill #2 wrote:

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:35:12 -0500, Phil Cartwright <pcartw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Actually, yes it was.

But actually, yes you did.

Yes you did.

Yes I was.

No, actually, it is not.

Whine, blub, sob, whine... Repeat.

Hrm. Another content-free, pure-namecalling post by someone who doesn't know how to respect Followup-To: headers. It seems there's a lot of these hereabouts!

Which would explain why you are unable to leave follow ups unmolested.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
  - From: Phil Cartwright

Prev by Date: Re: Annalen der Physik at googlebooks
Next by Date: Re: Why does light bend under gravity?
Previous by thread: Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
Next by thread: Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Finger Points to Fillings in UK Dentistry Crisis
... >>I already gave you a good insult, and all you did was whine about how ... >>you couldn't find the full headers on google groups. ...
(sci.med.dentistry)
Re: what can you gather from these headers?
... i can't figure out anything from the headers. ... Are you using someone else's internet connection illegally while you whine, ... Stupidity should be painful ...
(alt.marketing.online.ebay)
Re: Ive had enough!
... (snip OT whine about OT stuff - without an OT: in the headers) ... scrolling through it. ...
(rec.crafts.metalworking)
Re: Even Carl Rove now says McSame ads have gone too far
... Poor Neocon knows how to put s in his headers. ... Wouldn't want people to see you WHINE. ... Liberals and are able to follow a simple request ...
(alt.autos.toyota)
Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
... Whine, blub, sob, whine... ... pure-namecalling post by someone who doesn't ... know how to respect Followup-To: headers. ...
(sci.physics)