Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:20:51 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 27, 6:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 26, 10:43 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Eric: My 'handle' is one of the most easily recognized; and it's
apt--because it states my purpose, which is: To remove Einstein from
the top of the intellectual elite.
If you are going to answer a question I didn't ask, try to make sure
the answer isn't stupid.
Let's try again. I asked:
How can someone named "NoEinstein" possibly be objective? Or is your
point that you are not a scientist?
On the other hand, your name, Eric, is nice, but it doesn't give a
hint of your position. People ask: Eric... who? No one wonders who
NoEinstein is except you. -- NoEinstein --
Of course it doesn't, because my name is not who I am. If someone
wants to know my position, they do the thing sane people actually do
in those situations: ask.
[snip]
I love how you have decided that you MUST top-post at all times. Do
you consider being an annoying prick a maximization problem?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- References:
- Bernouli rule and free energy
- From: Gieniu
- Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- From: PD
- Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- From: NoEinstein
- Bernouli rule and free energy
- Prev by Date: Re: Binding Energy Question
- Next by Date: Re: Electromagnetic field
- Previous by thread: Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- Next by thread: Re: Bernouli rule and free energy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|