Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition

Vandar wrote:
Hrm. Another content-free, pure-namecalling post by someone who doesn't know how to respect Followup-To: headers. It seems there's a lot of these hereabouts!

Which would explain why you are unable to leave follow ups unmolested.

Actually, no, it wouldn't; it would predict me to be another netiquette-abuser instead of a netiquette-restorer as I actually am.

--
There's only four things you can be certain of: taxes, change, spam, and death.
.

Quantcast