Re: How to calculate entropy of particles?



On Feb 23, 4:06 pm, Edward Green <spamspamsp...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 15, 10:12 am, Rick Giuly <rgiuly.gr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Feb 14, 11:40 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 14, 9:22 pm, Rick Giuly <rgiuly.gr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello all,

I'm working on a molecular dynamics simulation based on Lennard-Jones
potential. Each particle has a position, a mass, and a velocity.

I know that temperature is the average kinetic energy of all the
particles, so temperature is no problem to calculate.

But, how would you calculate the entropy of the particles?

S = k ln(number of states)
dS = dQ / T

Any help is appreciated.

-Rick Giuly
If replying by email please use: rgiuly at ucsd dot edu

reference:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lennard-Jones_potential

The problem I have with S = k ln(number of states) is that it seems
like the number of states is nearly infinite, since there are multiple
particles and each can be at any location in space.

dS = dQ / T
This formula tells me something about how the entropy would change
when heat is added but I want to calculate the entropy as a function
of the position and velocity of all the particles at an instant in
time.

So I'm still not sure how to calculate the entropy (as a function of
the position and velocity of all the particles at an instant in time).

Annoying people like to say that entropy is a measure of our
ignorance. Specifically, it's a measure of how many microstates are
compatible with a given macrostate: the "macrostate" is a description
of our knowledge about the system (temperature, pressure, volume...
etc.).

Given a particular microstate, I don't see any necessary meaning to
its "entropy", although for extreme fluctuations, we might mean "the
entropy of the resulting restricted set of microstates if we
partitioned the system at that instant".

Example: by random fluctuation, more molecules will in general be in
one half of a box than the other half. If we lowered a shutter at
that instant, this fluctuation would be preserved in macrostate as a
density and pressure differential between the sides. If we calculated
the entropy of this resulting pair of systems, it would be lower than
the original unidivided system: i.e., the measure of the volume of
microstates it could occupy would be smaller. In this sense we might
say "the microstate showed an entropy fluctuation". However, the
value of this fluctuation would depend on how we partitioned the
system when we took the snapshot, lest you think the idea is
unambiguous.

Another problem seems to be the application of S = k ln(omega) to
cases where the possible states are "nearly infinite" -- i.e.,
continuous. Presumably omega is replaced by a volume in phase space.
The first problem is more fundamental.

Entropy is not like "mass" or "energy", which have a well defined
value for a microstate: it's a property of macrostates.

It is important to differentiate entropy as a thermodynamical
potential, and "information entropy".
For the first one quantization is uniquely defined - it is easy to
ground it to
the Plank constant. For every object be it a black hole, a cubic meter
of ideal gas or a crystal, thermodynamical entropy can be uniquely
defined regardless of the way you approach the calculation, the
resulting number will be same.

For second, information entropy, definition of degrees of freedom is
arbitrary.
Because it is easily applicable for different numerically useful
methods,
and arbitrary fields of information processing, it is widely used by
variety of researchers or even plain programmers to solve their
problems. A lot of these applications have nothing to do with physics
or thermodynamics, so initial meaning of word entropy is often
forgotten.

It is rather common to allow a fuzziness in the definition of
information entropy and its arbitrary way of defining the degrees of
freedom
to encroach into physical reality which is represented by
thermodynamical entropy.This approach is however easily provable
incorrect, because not only
can thermodynamical entropy be uniquely calculated for any physical
object using quantization of the phase space of impulses by Plank
constant, it can also be physically measured by measuring of thermal
capacities of the object and integrating them from zero up to the
given temperature.

Let's keep apples and oranges safely separated to avoid cross-
contamination!

Regards,
Yevgen
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
    ... that entropy must *always* increase and that entropy ... isolated system and we don't live in a totally isolated system. ... interact with each other, AKA an ideal gas. ... the particles *do* interact with one another. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Ludwig Boltzmann, entropy
    ... >>microstates in physical systems was known. ... momentum and nature of particles in the system. ... > to use in the appropriate equations to calculate the entropy. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: How to calculate entropy of particles?
    ... Each particle has a position, a mass, and a velocity. ... how would you calculate the entropy of the particles? ... You are correct, your entropy is going to be infinite if you consider only classical mechanics, because number of states is infinite. ... What makes entropy of a real system of particles non-infinite is the quantization of the phase space of impulses according to quantum mechanics. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: How to calculate entropy of particles?
    ... particles, so temperature is no problem to calculate. ... This formula tells me something about how the entropy would change ... it's a measure of how many microstates are ... by random fluctuation, more molecules will in general be in ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
    ... that entropy must *always* increase and that entropy ... the particles *do* interact with one another. ... Ideal Gas Law happens: the particles bounce off each other, ... misunderstanding the meaning of various scientific terms. ...
    (talk.origins)