Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality

On Mar 5, 10:30 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 5, 9:23 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Mar 5, 8:30 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 6:15 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Both Einstein and Newton looked at the universe like this:

Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality

Newton thought his mathematics represented absolute reality.

Einstein's mathematics are of relative reality.

Has anyone considered how to depict the entire expression (Absolute
reality -> mind -> Relative Reality) with mathematics?

More philosophical bull***.

It's a pretty clear challenge for mathematics.

Can mathematics replace the entire expression?

Since it took you several years to learn freshman level calculus, I
doubt you are qualified to even ask that question.



Why do you even post?

Do you have a bad attitude because you're trying to impress other
people with bad attitudes?

Or maybe I'm trying to convey the feeling that your philosophical
nonsense isn't appreciated. How many years have you been parroting
this bull***? How much closer are you to computing a number?


I would guess I'm less than a decade from a hypothesis that works for
all classical, quantum, and relativistic phenomena.
.