Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality

On Mar 5, 11:12 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 5, 9:32 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Mar 5, 10:30 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 9:23 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 8:30 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 6:15 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Both Einstein and Newton looked at the universe like this:

Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality

Newton thought his mathematics represented absolute reality.

Einstein's mathematics are of relative reality.

Has anyone considered how to depict the entire expression (Absolute
reality -> mind -> Relative Reality) with mathematics?

More philosophical bull***.

It's a pretty clear challenge for mathematics.

Can mathematics replace the entire expression?

Since it took you several years to learn freshman level calculus, I
doubt you are qualified to even ask that question.

Why do you even post?

Do you have a bad attitude because you're trying to impress other
people with bad attitudes?

Or maybe I'm trying to convey the feeling that your philosophical
nonsense isn't appreciated. How many years have you been parroting
this bull***? How much closer are you to computing a number?

I would guess I'm less than a decade from a hypothesis that works for
all classical, quantum, and relativistic phenomena.

Does that include actually learning enough mathematics and physics to
cover that? I really doubt it.


"I was inspired by the remarks in these books; not by the parts in
which everything was proved and demonstrated carefully and calculated,
because I couldn't understand those very well. At the young age what I
could understand were the remarks about the fact that this doesn't
make any sense, and the last sentence of the book of Dirac I can still
remember, "It seems that some essentially new physical ideas are here
needed." So, I had this as a challenge and an inspiration. I also had
a personal feeling, that since they didn't get a satisfactory answer
to the problem I wanted to solve, I don't have to pay a lot of
attention to what they did do."

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html

In the end our work is guided by reality. If all the currently
existing mathematics and physics (
.