Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:24:48 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 5, 6:05 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 5, 4:15 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 5, 1:33 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 5, 8:52 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 5, 8:21 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Michael Helland wrote:
Both Einstein and Newton looked at the universe like this:
Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
[snip crap]
Poison the well and every sip is poisoned. By misrepresenting others'
work you do not validate your own hallucinatory desires.
There is no mis-representation.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/msg/1fd692de4b6e5c4d
There are enough Newton and Einstein cites in that
sci.physics.research message to support what should be well known,
that Newton and Einstein were influenced by Descartes and Spinoza.
It is well known that until the Copenhagen Interpretation of QM, most
thinkers in the world viewed the universe like this:
Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
There's plenty evidence in Newton and Einstein's writing to suggest
they belonged to the same tradition.
Those are facts you'd like to deny, probably because you're more in
tune with the Copenhagen Interpretation.
....and how much of the mathematics of QM do you even know? Have you
ever solved the Schroedinger equation?
Nope. Have you?
Yes. Many times.
I'm taking my own approach.
Yet you haven't studied quantum theory in any detail.
It's not like the only mathematics in the world that fit QM is what
you know.
Other possibilities are out there for the finding.
Such arrogant stupidity. You have no concept of what you are talking
about.
.
- References:
- Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- Prev by Date: Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- Next by Date: Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- Previous by thread: Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- Next by thread: Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
