Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is Copyrighted.)

A simple way to visualize the similarity between Einstein's E =
mc^2 (sic) and Coriolis's KE = 1/2 mv^2 (sic), is to use a graph type
calculator, computer, or graph paper to draw a turned down parabola.
Galileo found that at any point in time, dropped objects will have
total fall distances according to the equation: d = t^2. The unit of
time is in seconds. The experimentally measured distance of fall at
the end of second one is 16.087'. Such distance is the 'units', and
the equation's numeric value can be found by substituting a specific
time, in seconds, into Galileo's equation.
At time 1 sec. the fall distance factor = 1; 2 sec. = 4; 3 sec. =
9; 4 sec. = 16; 5 sec. = 25; and etc., all the way to infinity. The
distance of fall curve should show the time, in seconds, on the +xx
axis, and the fall distances on the -yy axis. Because of the "1/2"
factor in Coriolis's equation, his curve on the same graph will have
the -y values being 1/2 as much per second, or values: .5; 2; 4.5; 8;
12.5; and etc., all the way to infinity.
Einstein's special relativity equation implies that the vector E
(or KE) increases as the square of the velocity at any point in time.
Since both his and Galileo's equation are functions of the square,
then, both curves will exactly match and can be superimposed one upon
the other. Galileo's parabola represents distance of fall, while
Einstein's represents the supposed accruing vector KE. Since the
slope of Galileo's curve of distance vs. time is velocity, then, the
slope of Einstein's curve must correlate to velocity as well, because
both equations increase equally with respect to time.
Looking at the turned down parabola, you will note that the
distance increase (in 'd' multiples) in second 1 = 1; sec. 2 = 3; sec.
3 = 5; sec. 4 = 7; sec. 5 = 9; and etc., all the way to infinity.
Einstein's equation (or Coriolis's equation without that factor 1/2) has
the KE progression in weight multiples of: 1; 4; 9; 16, 36, 49...
Clearly, Einstein's energy increase is greater each second than the
previous second. But the force of gravity is equal to an object's
static weight, only. And static weight doesn't change for objects
near the Earth. Einstein's equation would require that gravity keep
applying the most energy to objects which happen to be falling faster--
which is impossible!
A big reason the errors in both Coriolis's and Einstein's
equations weren't realized before now is that everyone accepted that a
farther falling object hits harder (which is true). But they
erroneously equated the KE exactly to the fall distance. But the only
thing that will truly increase KE is to increase velocity. The
distance of fall curve of Galileo is NOT a velocity increase curve, it
is a distance increase curve! The velocity is the SLOPE of his curve,
and that slope increases UNIFORMLY, or additively, from the previous
second's velocity value all the way to infinity.
Uniform velocity plots as a straight line that begins at zero and
has values of 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; and etc. As NoEinstein has proved,
the KE increase will correspond to the velocity increase factors
above, IF one adds in the falling object's static weight, or weight
unit 1. All falling objects begin with a 'g' force value of 1, NOT
zero! Heretofore, no one has considered that static weight
contributes to KE. My equation is: KE = a/g (m) + v/32.174 (m), and
plots as a straight line. All near Earth objects begin falling with a
KE equal to their weight. The starting KE of an object would be zero
only if it was motionless in deep outer space at the moment a rocket
engine is turned on.
A metal ball rolling on a level table in a lab is ACCELERATING
into the table 32.174' per second EACH second, or it has a potential
fall distance of 16.087' in one second. Let that same ball roll off
of the table onto a precision scale and the scale will instantaneously
register a KE (force) equal to the ball's weight. No downward
velocity of the ball is required.
The fact that no one before NoEinstein has considered that static
weight adds to KE, helps to explain why it has taken nearly two
centuries for Coriolis's equation to be disproved. -- NoEinstein --

Cleaning Away Einstein's Mishmash
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847a9cb50de7f0/739aef0aee462d26?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#739aef0aee462d26

__________
.

Relevant Pages
Loading