Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality

On Mar 5, 9:05 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 5, 11:01 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 7:29 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 10:40 am, MichaelHelland<mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 11:12 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 9:32 am, MichaelHelland<mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 10:30 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 9:23 am, MichaelHelland<mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 8:30 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 6:15 am, MichaelHelland<mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Both Einstein and Newton looked at the universe like this:

Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality

Newton thought his mathematics represented absolute reality.

Einstein's mathematics are of relative reality.

Has anyone considered how to depict the entire expression (Absolute
reality -> mind -> Relative Reality) with mathematics?

More philosophical bull***.

It's a pretty clear challenge for mathematics.

Can mathematics replace the entire expression?

Since it took you several years to learn freshman level calculus, I
doubt you are qualified to even ask that question.

Why do you even post?

Do you have a bad attitude because you're trying to impress other
people with bad attitudes?

Or maybe I'm trying to convey the feeling that your philosophical
nonsense isn't appreciated. How many years have you been parroting
this bull***? How much closer are you to computing a number?

I would guess I'm less than a decade from a hypothesis that works for
all classical, quantum, and relativistic phenomena.

Does that include actually learning enough mathematics and physics to
cover that? I really doubt it.

"I was inspired by the remarks in these books; not by the parts in
which everything was proved and demonstrated carefully and calculated,
because I couldn't understand those very well. At the young age what I
could understand were the remarks about the fact that this doesn't
make any sense, and the last sentence of the book of Dirac I can still
remember, "It seems that some essentially new physical ideas are here
needed." So, I had this as a challenge and an inspiration. I also had
a personal feeling, that since they didn't get a satisfactory answer
to the problem I wanted to solve, I don't have to pay a lot of
attention to what they did do."

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lec...

In the end our work is guided by reality. If all the currently
existing mathematics and physics (

You are not Feynman.

You haven't studied physics at any significant level. You have no
understanding of classical mechanics, special or general relativity,
quantum theory, or any other fucking thing. You have spent the last
four years or so spewing your nonsense onto this newsgroup and you are
not one fucking inch closer to being able to understand - much less
replicate - even the simplest things in physics.

In conclusion, shut the *** up until you get educated.

I made computer programs that solved simple physics problems when I
was 16.

I suppose I could have spent the last ten years studying more physics.

Yes then you might know some actual physics....

But I spent it writing more computer programs. You know. Work that
people you pay you for because it improves their business.

Yeah, writing cash register software, and pseudo programming in Visual
Fox Pro, congrats, combined with taking years to master intro calculus
your well on your way to being a scientist... haha..

<snip>

The point is, unless there they are actually written on God's stone
tablets somewhere, equations are just one possible way of doing
physics with pen and paper.

If you ever understand enough science to go your own way then fine,
the point is you don't....

I think I'm coming up with a physics based on a different type of
mathematics.

Yeah, well we've seen you don't think nor do you know enough math to
come up with a new math...


I didn't say I came up with a new math.

I said tackle the problem differently, with different math.

I can understand why you're lost.
.

Quantcast