Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: "Robert J. Kolker" <bobkolker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:20:31 -0400
Michael Helland wrote:
On Mar 6, 10:33 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 6, 7:08 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Leibniz is not an answer, much less an acceptable answer since he died
centuries before QM even existed.
"Until the discovery of subatomic particles and the quantum mechanics
governing them, many of Leibniz's speculative ideas about aspects of
nature not reducible to statics and dynamics made little sense. "
wikipedia
Hindsight sure is 20/20, huh?
Yes.
That's why it is remarkable Leibniz anticipated QM so far in advance.
So did Leucippus and Democritus almost 2500 years ago.
Bob Kolker
.
- References:
- Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- From: Michael Helland
- Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- Prev by Date: Re: About God
- Next by Date: Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- Previous by thread: Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- Next by thread: Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|