Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality

On Mar 10, 3:54 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 9, 10:51 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Mar 9, 8:26 pm, MichaelHelland<mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 7, 4:03 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip> crap
Learn about the box then you can think outside the box...

That sounds like propaganda for the box.

Sure what ever?

Ever heard of a memebot?

Sounds like more of philosophy babble that we all expect from you...

Have you ever heard of thinking before you speak?

Hmm... nope... obviously not since you missed my simple point
completely, you took aim at the side of the barn from point blank and
missed congrats...

I can say the same thing about you.


Yeah, and in my case its false in yours its true, what's your point?
Of course you would being a fool...

This is typical of a lack of objectivity.


Lack of objectivity is not demonstrated by the rejection of foolish
ideas, and the ravings of a mad man...

It's pretty obvious I can think out of the box.


Thinking outside the box does not imply that you can just imagine
stuff, and anyways you may think outside some box but it ain't in this
reality. Since as you admit you know nothing the modern physics your
replacing.

In fact your statement that you can think out of the box is made all
the more ridiculous by the fact that its just a shield for your
ignorance and complete lack of a sincere desire to learn. Little
wonder your such a failure...

I reformulated Leibniz's metaphysics independently on a hunch.


Yeah, and got it wrong, congrats, tell me something new...

Most people don't understand his work even after being exposed to it.

Actually your the person who doesn't understand it... but thats ok
your special in your own raving lunatic way... yes you are special
indeed...

What makes the statement even more comical is that you don't even
understand basic calculus which your beloved Leibiniz helped to
create. You claim to hold him in high esteem but can't be bothered to
do him the favor of correctly understanding his ideas, instead you
cheapen them and use them as a shield for your wanton, self-severing
ignorance.

Comeback with some intelligent comments, you hapless half-wit.

Oh and maybe since you are an expert on all things Leibiniz perhaps
you can explain to me the fundamental theorem of calculus so as to
show you know what your talking about.

Cheers


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Wizards and Daggers (still): YANI: Wizard nerfing
    ... Yeah, that is why every ascension kit looks exactly the same - the huge ... Almost every player will have GDSM or CoMR unless they find/wish for an ... Twoweaponers will have no shield, ... others generally a small, elven, or reflection shield depending on ...
    (rec.games.roguelike.nethack)
  • Re: What Did Shell/Pennzoil Know?
    ... That's the payoff for being the "Official Fuel of Na$car"! ... Oh yeah - btw... ... Well, if you do, then why did you make such an assnine statement? ... Don't mistake apathy for ignorance. ...
    (rec.autos.sport.nascar)
  • Re: Can a British citizen be refused a NI number?
    ... The fact you cannot find any British person who is not ... While Mike obviously does have some difficulties with English, ... just shows his ignorance at every chance. ... Yeah, yeah. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: OT: New 1st person shooter..?
    ... Yeah, says you ... ... and that includes GAMES! ... even if using the 'ignorance is bliss' line (and ... I'm not saying PC's are better than Macs, just that for me the PC is ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Queen moving like Knight ?
    ... move like a Knight. ... Yeah - silly bitch.. ... I have noticed that some cheap chess sets come with poorly ... There's ample ignorance in every society of which I know. ...
    (rec.games.chess.misc)