Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality



On Mar 10, 6:10 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 10, 2:50 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, MichaelHelland<mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip> worthless mental sputum, or snot....

"What is NKS?

It is a new kind of science based on simple programs. Almost all the
science that's been done for the past three hundred or so years has
been based in the end on the idea that things in our universe somehow
follow rules that can be represented by traditional mathematical
equations. The basic idea that underlies A New Kind of Science is that
that's much too restrictive, and that in fact one should consider the
vastly more general kinds of rules that can be embodied, for example,
in computer programs.

Instead of asking what mathematical equation some system obeys, it
asks what simple program produces the behavior seen in that system.
Pure NKS investigates how various types of simple programs typically
behave - much as traditional mathematics examines various mathematical
equations. Applied NKS then looks for simple programs behind the
behavior seen in natural and other systems. "

http://forum.wolframscience.com/misc.php?s=&action=faq&page=2#whatnks

Congrats you cited a source....

You believe mathematics requires equations.

You can't understand the alternative, nor do you want to.

Mikeyou have never had  a single NKS idea in your life, your theory
doesn't fit in NKS, sorry that won't save your idea from the utter
failure that it is.

The issue is that NKS relies on simple programs, your idea doesn't
sorry mikey your wrong.... by the way do you even know what a simple
program is?

Yes.

Here is the simple program in my paper:

* Setup Initial Conditions

public oAbsoluteMatter
oAbsoluteMatter = createobject("collection")
oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", -1, 10, 20, 10, 2,
0, 0))
oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", 1, 20, 10, 10, 0,
2, 0))

*Alternative Initial Conditions for a little more complexity

*public oAbsoluteMatter
*oAbsoluteMatter = createobject("collection")
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", -1, 10, 20, 10,
20, 0, 0))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", 1, 20, 10, 10, 0,
2, 0))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", -1, 10, 20, 10,
-10, 4, 1))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", 1, 20, 10, 10, 1,
-2, -1))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", -1, 5, 30, 40,
-20, 35, 0))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", -1, 605, 30, 25,
-10, 2, -1))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", -1, 100, 2, 10,
20, 50, 70))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", 1, 21, 10, 10, 4,
2, -10))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", -1, 12, 20, 10,
-1, -40, 1))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", 1, 2, 10, 10, 1,
-2, -1))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", -1, 5, 6, 40, -20,
65, 0))
*oAbsoluteMatter.Add(createobject("absoluteMatter", -1, 0, 4, 25, 10,
-2, -1))

do while .t.

        clear

        for each oA in oAbsoluteMatter
                oA.DoStuff()
        endfor

        wait window

enddo

* end of program

*class definitions
define class absoluteMatter as Custom
        nType = 0
        nX = 0
        nY = 0
        nZ = 0
        nDx = 0
        nDy = 0
        nDz = 0

        procedure Init(tnType, tnX, tnY, tnZ, tnDx, tnDy, tnDz)

                this.nType = tnType
                this.nX = tnX
                this.nY = tnY
                this.nZ = tnZ
                this.nDx = tnDx
                this.nDy = tnDy
                this.nDz = tnDz

        endproc

        procedure DoStuff

                * draw us visuall on the screen
                ?str(this.nType) + str(this.nX) + str(this..nY)
                _screen.FillStyle = 0
                _screen.FillColor = iif(this.nType = 1, rgb(255, 0, 0), rgb(0, 0,
255))
                _screen.Circle(2, 100 + this.nX, 100 + this.nY)

                * move inertially
                this.nX = this.nX + this.nDx
                this.nY = this.nY + this.nDy
                this.nZ = this.nZ + this.nDz

                * see if there's anything to interact with
                for each oB in oAbsoluteMatter
                        lnDx = oB.nDx
                        lnDy = oB.nDy
                        lnDz = oB.nDz
                        oB.nDx = this.nDx
                        oB.nDy = this.nDy
                        oB.nDz = this.nDz
                        this.nDx = lnDx
                        this.nDy = lnDy
                        this.nDz = lnDz
                endfor

        endproc

enddefine


so predict something from this... you can't sorry this is just little
Pseudo programming that substitutes for nothing.

<snip>

So lets do a little informal test to prove me wrong Mikey boy:

Don't worry these are topics you have mentioned and I'm sure you
understand already, in fact I'll give you the titles of the books
where the answers can be found and since I am sure you already have an
extensive library on the topic of physics you probably own these
books.

So lets begin... the Mikeus Ignoramus or not test:

Books:
Quantum Theory by David Bohm
Theoretical Nuclear Physics by Blatt, Weisskopf

Question 1: Give me a definition of what a harmonic oscillator is and
its function in Quantum Theory.

Question 2: What is the mathematical forumulation of the first
conservation law of nuclear reactions?

Question 3: What is an example of an adiabatic change?

Bonus Question: Define for me the Pauli Principle in your own words

Bonus Question 2: What is the Biot-Savart Law in your own words?

No using wikipediamikeand copying and pasting this has to bemike
demonstrating is superior knowledge of the physics he talks about you
must cite your sources for each scholarly articles.

Cheers

I don't know the answer to those questions.

There are also plenty of chemistry questions I don't know the answer
to. Or biology. Or astronomy.


These are only question from fields you claim to revise or mention...
but as we know you know nothing of them....

My goal is not to advance any existing scientific field.

Well good, then what are you doing talking to people who study real
science, go find some fairy tale forum for your ideas, make them into
a fiction novel...


I don't have any new details.

No kidding


My goal is to promote an accurate big picture, and let that guide us
toward new mathematical expressions.

Your not qualified as exemplified by the fact you can't answer my
simple questions.

I don't expect anyone to join the revolution on account of what I have
to say.

Good nobody will...

Cheers

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality
    ... science that's been done for the past three hundred or so years has ... Pure NKS investigates how various types of simple programs typically ... behave - much as traditional mathematics examines various mathematical ... Theoretical Nuclear Physics by Blatt, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? [ scientific methods ]
    ... > That may be true for your science, and for some possibly Post Modernist ... of physics are like that eg the law of conservation of energy is no more ... should not be used - its context is not well defined. ... >> training but not of the type used in philosophy which is along the lines ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? [ scientific methods ]
    ... > That may be true for your science, and for some possibly Post Modernist ... of physics are like that eg the law of conservation of energy is no more ... should not be used - its context is not well defined. ... >> training but not of the type used in philosophy which is along the lines ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Explaining Time Dilation
    ... >> SNIP ... > presumably 'non math construct'. ... > agree with Newtonian physics) and G = T a math construct. ... However science does not deal ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Hama-ost
    ... Theory of Evolution and Religious Fundamentalists who support Intelligent ... As far as I see matters, Science is concerned with the physical aspect of ... (Discoveries in Quantum Physics appear to have reached ... some conclusion that can be verified by perception. ...
    (soc.religion.islam)