Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality

On Mar 10, 3:31 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 10, 5:41 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>

What makes the statement even more comical is that you don't even
understand basic calculus which your beloved Leibiniz helped to
create.

Sure I do. I solved plenty of calc problems in college.

I calculated limits, the area under a curve.

I conceptualized the relationship between velocity and acceleration
through derivatives and antiderivatives.

It's not magic.

Apparently it is since you still can't come up with a decent physics
theory after 4 years.


Because I haven't revolutionized physics in 4 years (as we all know
everyone has!), then apparently I don't know what I claim I know.

Brilliant.

It is in your best interest to ignore me.


<snip>
I claimed to have re-invented some of his ideas (which where
themselves re-inventions of previous ideas).

Who cares, that is insignificant, and you've claimed much more then
that, you claim to be re-inventing physics.


I'm claiming to have discovered a path.

Some might explore it.

But not many.

And you've made up your mind.

We should probably part ways.

Thanks for the conversation.
.

Quantcast