Re: Absolute reality -> mind -> Relative Reality

On Mar 10, 6:43 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 10, 5:10 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Mar 10, 1:41 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 10, 2:07 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 10, 3:54 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 9, 10:51 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 9, 8:26 pm, MichaelHelland<mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 7, 4:03 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip> crap
Learn about the box then you can think outside the box...

That sounds like propaganda for the box.

Sure what ever?

Ever heard of a memebot?

Sounds like more of philosophy babble that we all expect from you...

Have you ever heard of thinking before you speak?

Hmm... nope... obviously not since you missed my simple point
completely, you took aim at the side of the barn from point blank and
missed congrats...

I can say the same thing about you.

Yeah, and in my case its false in yours its true, what's your point?
Of course you would being a fool...

This is typical of a lack of objectivity.

Lack of objectivity is not demonstrated by the rejection of foolish
ideas, and the ravings of a mad man...

Depends on the critical content of the rejection.

Yours is lacking.

It's pretty obvious I can think out of the box.

Thinking outside the box does not imply that you can just imagine
stuff, and anyways you may think outside some box but it ain't in this
reality. Since as you admit you know nothing the modern physics your
replacing.

In fact your statement that you can think out of the box is made all
the more ridiculous by the fact that its just a shield for your
ignorance and complete lack of a sincere desire to learn. Little
wonder your such a failure...

I reformulated Leibniz's metaphysics independently on a hunch.

Yeah, and got it wrong, congrats, tell me something new...

Most people don't understand his work even after being exposed to it.

Actually your the person who doesn't understand it... but thats ok
your special in your own raving lunatic way... yes you are special
indeed...

What makes the statement even more comical is that you don't even
understand basic calculus which your beloved Leibiniz helped to
create.

Sure I do. I solved plenty of calc problems in college.

I calculated limits, the area under a curve.

I conceptualized the relationship between velocity and acceleration
through derivatives and antiderivatives.

Congrat-u-fucking-lations, you understand the most basic concepts of
first semester calculus.

Do you know anything about the varying iterations of Stoke's theorem?
Multivariable calculus? Or did your education in mathematics end
there?

It's not magic.

Of course it isn't.

So why does knowing advanced calculus give you magical powers?

It doesn't.

I continue to harp on basic calculus because calculus is one of THE
building blocks to understanding modern physics. You only know the
smallest, tiniest amount of what I have been taught.


The maths relevant to my claims are along the lines of NKS, not
equations of any kind.

You boldly proclaim those aren't real maths.

Learn to differentiate between what Wolfram is pushing and what you
are actually doing. Trying to shield yourself from criticism by hiding
behind the ideas of past and present scientists is pretty fucking
pathetic. And in your case - stupid, since Wolfram's ideas are
accepted by nobody but Wolfram. Try to pick a better model.


What a little *** head.

Maybe I'm over zealous.

Maybe I'm misguided.

Maybe I'm fucking nuts

Maybe I'm just a confused ignorant jerk.

But you're still a little *** head.

But unlike you, I can actually make a claim to being a scientist.
That's good enough for me.

.

Quantcast