Re: Explanation of the strange eclipses
- From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:52:05 GMT
"tadchem" <tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ab21988b-b427-4730-8c5a-ae5efd220bc9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| On Mar 14, 2:30 am, vps137 <vps...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
| <snip>
|
| > Thank you for good reference but the eclipses I considered are not
| > depend from mutual positions of the Sun and the Moon. They seldom
| > happened without any law in the rather small areas. It tells us that
| > if my model is true there are rather small amount of the other
| > universes near our Universe.
|
| To explain Sam's comment, there is only one Universe. By definition,
| everything that can be observed and everything that can *affect* what
| can be observed is in the One Universe.
|
| Other "universes" are pure fantasy. They cannot be observed, nor can
| they affect anything which can be observed. In practice their
| 'existence' is indistinguishable from 'nonexistence.'
|
| Tom Davidson
| Richmond, VA
A minor quibble:
Let there be an observer and a body to observe; let the distance
between them increase indefinitely until the body can no longer
be observed nor affect anything that can be observed, then
double the distance. Is the body then part of the universe
(which includes everything) or a separate entity outside it?
.
- References:
- Explanation of the strange eclipses
- From: vps137
- Re: Explanation of the strange eclipses
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Explanation of the strange eclipses
- From: vps137
- Re: Explanation of the strange eclipses
- From: tadchem
- Explanation of the strange eclipses
- Prev by Date: General Relativity and Lottery
- Next by Date: Re: I don't have to look to know that the moon is still there.
- Previous by thread: Re: Explanation of the strange eclipses
- Next by thread: Re: Explanation of the strange eclipses
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|