Re: Perpetum Mobile Idea
- From: "gb6724@xxxxxxxxx" <gb6724@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 18, 10:34 am, "gb6...@xxxxxxxxx" <gb6...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 17, 12:59 pm, "CWatters"
<colin.watt...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<gb6...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:76105b62-f7f0-4486-ba81-572ba3dfc306@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I had this idea a long time ago, found it in my bitmap files,
completely forgot about it,
looked at it and said: It should work.
There can be valves allowing flow one way only (clockwise) or in any
direction without
valves.
http://www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/perp359.JPG
Putting aside COE for a moment...
The extra mass on the right can only cause the large cylinder to rotate IF
the valves between pockets are closed.
Very small openings between pockets still allow the weight to sit and
that
weight pushes down. The water flows slowly between pockets, no valves
are needed. Just the large volume of sitting pressure presses water
(theoretically)
between pockets. The passage on the left is narrow, the weight that
presses on
the much smaller weight on the left has a huge difference.
It can't BOTH flow from A-B AND push the cylinder around.
It is delayed. The weight on the right is huge.
In practise it will turn 90 degrees, oscillate a bit like a pendulum and stop.
It can't move down 90 degrees until water on the left is pressed
through. It
is self slowing.
If the cylinder is held stationary...the water pressure on the left and
right is the same so the water doesn't flow anywhere.
Very large weight on the right slowly squeezes through a much smaller
weight on the left. A large weight can squeeze up a smaller weight
much
higher.
One more to add the the Museum of Unworkable Devices...
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/unwork.htm
Not yet.
Also the thing wouldn't rotate 90 degrees because the two cylinders
are held by a chain to rotate together by a bycicle chain. The thing
is
held in place.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Perpetum Mobile Idea
- From: CWatters
- Re: Perpetum Mobile Idea
- References:
- Perpetum Mobile Idea
- From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Perpetum Mobile Idea
- From: CWatters
- Re: Perpetum Mobile Idea
- From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
- Perpetum Mobile Idea
- Prev by Date: Re: Mathematics for a Physicist
- Next by Date: Re: making the earth go farther from the sun
- Previous by thread: Re: Perpetum Mobile Idea
- Next by thread: Re: Perpetum Mobile Idea
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|