Re: If someone just took a minute to listen to me

On Mar 22, 1:43 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 22, 1:24 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>

Physics isn't just relativity and QM.

That's just part of it.

Sure, and you don't even know that part and the questions I have asked
you to answer were from not only Quantum Mechanics, but theoretical
nuclear physics, electromagnetic theory, and I may have even asked you
a question from QCD I don't recall...

You act as if one needs to know what you know about physics before
they can have any important ideas.

You need to know where others have been so you can know whether what
you are doing is new or not and whether or not you are merely
repeating the mistakes of others...


Others have been exploring equations.

There are new mistakes to make in the territory of programs.


<snip> maudlin crap

Through Leibniz's work.

Fantastic make a prediction and back your paper up with citations...
stop hiding behind leibniz...

The scientific method is what I'm interested in.

You don't even know what the scientific method is as evidenced from
your paper and your last 4 years of posting....

I know it better than you do.

Evidenced by your paper, that merely use buzzwords from the scientific
method without actually applying it? Or do you mean because you
believe the scientific method consists solely of using you r
imagination and has nothing to do with knowledge...?


I believe it's a combination of rationalism and empiricism.

You're the one with the simplistic view.



I'd ask what sort of degrees and qualifications you possess.

Currently I am pursuing a PhD in Mathematics, and I have read
extensively over the past years on physics..


Have you solved the Schro equation?


But you're not likely to answer questions about yourself.

Sure whatever you say... oh yes and I forgot to mention I am in my
twenties and starting two companies... congrats to me... oh yes and as
I have mentioned congrats to me...

Focusing on my personality seems to be your only capacity.

but its fun... and you ask for it....

How many great physicists worked in isolation?

Not really relevant,

Ha.

I'm glad you find it humorous.... I assume the majority of the humor
comes from the fact that your not a physicist and never will be and
yet you try to act as if you are...

the key here is your not a physicist and will
never be taken seriously enough, not to have to work in isolation...

And how many worked through correspondence and collaboration?

Your not collaborating

Not with you.

too true....

There are people that are objective out there though.

Objective doesn't mean agrees with crank....


You're right.

In this case, it would mean having a direct criticism of the
conjecture, rather than pointing out it isn't a hypothesis.



and most people who agree
with you, are as ignorant or more so then you... the whole blind
leading the blind, dogs eating other dogs vomit....

since you refuse to learn anything from what
people tell you, or to go off and educate yourself, you pompous waste
of space....

Cheers

I reiterate my last comments they were exceedingly choice.... don't
you think so?

And one more time for good measure:

"> >since you refuse to learn anything from what

people tell you, or to go off and educate yourself, you pompous waste
of space....

Cheers"


I've learned a considerable amount from what people tell me.

All your knowledge of my personality flaws is old news.
.

Quantcast