Re: Mike Helland Reading List

On Mar 24, 2:34 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 24, 5:12 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>

That's hard to do when you have bills to pay.

No kidding, preaching to the choir, I happen to have bills, school,
research, and I am starting two companies, don't talk to me about
time, this may also be why I don't normally get more 5-6hrs sleep
separate issue... your just lazy...

That's why most people that do this sort of work are paid by their
Universities.

Yeah, not everyone, and that merely makes aspects easier... it doesn't
change the amount of commitment....

Interestingly enough, after Newton, the greatest scientists in the
world formulated his own views of the world outside the structures of
the University.

That's why I was thinking a research grant would be a good idea.

Yeah that requires an idea....

I have an idea.

Yeah, and an idea you can back up, and the ability to demonstrate you
know your stuff, and you admit you don't... so you still won't get the
grant... maybe when you've spent years studying this stuff you might
have a chance...

The thing you leave out Mike is that people who succeed in doing these
things don't put up these lame excuses of bills for why they are to
lazy to learn about what they are "interested" in... personally I
think you just like to imagine, which is fine, but then you should
stop fooling yourself that your doing more then that...

This Japanese guy has a very similar idea:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T2K-47MKC1...

Yeah, mr I have no money you actually paid 31 dollars to read the
article (that you didn't understand", ha... not to mention that paper
is well reasoned and is nothing like what your paper is, you make the
mistake of attributing similarities from the title and your own ideas,
this is a problem easily remedied by looking at the abstract which if
you understood it, you'd see that there is really no similarity. The
most striking difference being one is a published idea and yours in
not...


I read the paper for free from another source.

It's gratifying to see my "word salad" being served by others.


Whether my ideas are worth exploring or not isn't really up for
discussion.

No your right, you don't have a valid idea, which when you learn
physics you'll realize...

There are thousands of people working on these ideas.

Not yours, aspects yes, but of course I can type enough random words
to make a sentence that doesn't mean anything... the fact that i can
pull 5 ideas from you paper that may be correct if taken charitably
does not make you idea correct... in fact its still wrong, and you are
the only one wasting his time working on your foolish concept... due
to your overwhelming ignorance...

These ideas are going to fuel the next scientific revolution.

Yes ideas of real scientists like myself will, you will have no part
in that, you are an ignorant bystander who wants to be part of the
revolution, but is to lazy to learn the topics... and thus will have
not part to play in the revolution....

Who wouldn't want to be part of that?

You apparently since your laziness and feeble excuses keep you on the
outside, making foolish comments...

<snip>

Use the library and the internet....

I do.

Obviously not, since your still ignorant after 4 years, so either your
lying about using the library and the internet or your really
stupid... take your pick...

Currently I am working through much simpler Physics textbooks.

Congrats... apply the ideas to your paper, and if your paper seems
stupid then your understanding physics...

<snip>

Cheers


You're so one dimensional.
.