Re: Mike Helland Reading List

On Mar 24, 6:23 pm, theman <genericjoe2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 24, 6:00 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>



You're so one dimensional.

Post the link where you found the paper prove me wrong....


http://books.google.com/books?id=Fvs3sw9ZVfsC&pg=PA111&lpg=PA111&dq=quantum+monadology&source=web&ots=4iyxRSKhQg&sig=YGiRtV136hpxRrWJnPUwcCzXZwY&hl=en

He says the Lorentz transformation may be interpreted as the
correspondences between internal worlds. Page 114

That's nearly what I said about time dilation and relativity in my
model:

"I described a singular virtual environment. (first set of
information)

I also said there will be an internal observer, which is really a
model of the virtual environment in the virtual environment (second
set of information).

I should have said there should be internal observers. Plural.

Many models within the model.

Their variations are important.

I predict my conjecture will explain time dilation and length
contraction by using more than one observer. "
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/1da71af6012924f7


He also says "It is only after obtaining a mathematical formulation of
monadology that we are able to know whether monadology is consistent
with physics or not."

That's indirectly relevant, because until a conjecture becomes a
hypothesis, it is not falsifiable.

I admit my ideas have a ways to go along the steps of the scientific
method.

You're using that to act as if they are still at the starting gates.

But only your understanding of monadology. You have yet to take the
first step to understanding: wanting to understand.




so you just continue to post you trash, and
I'll continue to put in the trash can...

One man's trash...


Its just a shame that people like you have to infect public place with
your presence the stench of ignorance....

So Mike no more Mr Nice Guy, you want help you can kiss my feet, and
beg...

You are "theman."

Pretty tough sounding. LOL.
.