Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
- From: Mike <eleatis@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 28, 6:56 am, Tim Tyler <seemy...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The builders of the world's biggest particle collider are being sued in
federal court over fears that the experiment might create globe-gobbling
black holes or never-before-seen strains of matter that would destroy
the planet.
Representatives at Fermilab in Illinois and at Europe's CERN laboratory,
two of the defendants in the case, say there's no chance that the Large
Hadron Collider would cause such cosmic catastrophes. Nevertheless,
they're bracing to defend themselves in the courtroom as well as the
court of public opinion.
--
Everything is possible. If chaos is indeed prevelant in the world, a
slight variation in initial condition may create a series of
catastrophic failures, for example earthquake activity, etc.
Hey look, I have not been to these threads for a while neither I plan
to be back since they offer shelter to insulting species like Uncle
Al, impotent impeciles like Erica Gissa, a stupid high school dropout
who thiks the free fall equation is an ODE:
http://groups.google.gr/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/dd24a9cdf16c4daf
then there are the _know_in_reality_nothing Sum Warmleys, the confused
to a singularity PD, and other losers.
The important think about the LHC is the following:
(1) When cornered, scientists claim their theories are MODELS of who
the universe works, not representation of a metaphysical reality, like
the real composition of matter
(2) At the same time, they spend 4 billion of taxpayer money to try to
probve a hypothesis about a Higgs boson, Hawking has already given a
high probability it does not exist.
(3) But searching for a particle to support a mathematical model is
actually believing the model represents how the world works. Isn't
that exactly what the multi-billion euro experiemnt is doing?
(4) then, before that, why do they tell us, what is mass, inertia,
even spacetime, more importantly time, things that are in the
foundations of the model?
Oh wait, I got an answer: space is what a ruler (space) measures and
time is what a clock (timer) measures?
I tell you something people: Scholastic philosophy was stupid but
NEVER violated the rules of logic. Actually, the rules of logic were
developed by scholastic philosophers mostly.
Modern science completely violates rules of logic in such a blunt way
people wonder is for the moment of justifying their curiocity these
insane people would not stop from destroying earth.
I think the LHC experiment SHOUL BE STOPPED NOW until these idiots
tell us what is mass, spacetime, inertia, etc.
Neverthless, they won't find anything worth the billions.
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
- From: Tim Tyler
- Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
- Prev by Date: Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
- Next by Date: Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
- Next by thread: Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|