Re: Ancient Greek Inference

On Mar 31, 8:05 am, Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondoug...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Mar 30, 4:26 pm, tadchem <tadc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Mar 30, 9:22 am, "Robert J. Kolker" <bobkol...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Douglas Eagleson wrote:

Anybody can now act as a real student of Aristotle. Combined thought
to memory. Each thought would be controled and only definitive
nonwandering mind events would occur. Clear inference was as simple
as this example.

Is that why Aristotle fucked up motion so badly? His physics was not
even wrong.

Bob Kolker

Eagleson cannot even master English grammar. He is probably also
incapable of the clarity of thought to recognize that Aristotle's
physics and astronomy were dead wrong. At least the Pythagoreans had
a handle on some math.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

I explained the basic inference.

That doesn't make it correct, that doesn't make it empirically
verified, and it doesn't even make it smart.

Inference is only a small part of the scientific method, and valuable
only AFTER the empirical data is available for interpretation.

And you spout crap at the topic like
a jackass.

Jackasses like me can only spout crap out of one end, but in this case
it is the appropriate response. It's like a dog pissing on a hydrant
to cover the stench of another dog's piss with his own. That makes me
the winner, for now.

You have ZERO sensible reaction to the content.

Perhaps that is because the content has zero sense.

The worst thing top deal with is baby grammer scientists.

You can't spell, either. You've given me a 'two-fer.' I will have to
guess that what you meant to say is "The worst thing TO deal with is
baby GRAMMAR scientists."

BTW, your name anagrams to "Do Lose Languages," among other things:
http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=douglas+eagleson&t=1000

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

.