sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Enes
• It's fun to light / nurse / watch the ember.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Igor
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Igor
• memristor, new memory device?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Phantom
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Photons, Magnetons and Gravitons and Why You Need NOt Think about Quantum Physics
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: none
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 248.4: Japan Comes To Rescue With Kinetic Energy
  • From: Krieg Suden
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Quantum Gravity 248.4: Japan Comes To Rescue With Kinetic Energy
  • From: Krieg Suden
• Re: Photons, Magnetons and Gravitons and Why You Need NOt Think about Quantum Physics
  • From: Darwin123
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Esab
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• [Fwd: CODE DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS (CDMA) SIGNALS IN GLONASS]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Get a lot before you die!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• USENET RULE FOR QUANTUM THEORY POSTERS
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Get a lot before you die!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Photons, Magnetons and Gravitons and Why You Need NOt Think about Quantum Physics
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The essense of General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Follow That Cosmic Jet
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Follow That Cosmic Jet
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Seminars on New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A blaster, anybody?
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Quantum Gravity 249.0: The tan(x) Solution of Riccati Differential Equation and The Fundamental Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 249.0: The tan(x) Solution of Riccati Differential Equation and The Fundamental Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Posts by mental patients
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hubble Law in a simple program
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Posts by mental patients
  • From: jimp
• Re: Hubble Law in a simple program
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: student manual solution instructor solution manual study guide
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Posts by mental patients
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• student manual solution instructor solution manual study guide
  • From: manual solution for all
• student manual solution instructor solution manual study guide
  • From: manual solution for all
• student manual solution instructor solution manual study guide
  • From: manual solution for all
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Phantom
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Quantum Gravity 248.5: Intersection with the Unparticle Research in arXiv
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: jimp
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Phantom
• Re: Straightforward question about the presence of PI in EFE.
  • From: VTR250
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Hubble Law in a simple program
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Quantum Gravity 248.4: Japan Comes To Rescue With Kinetic Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The “ rich ” are never lonely.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Hubble Law in a simple program
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: PD
• Hubble Law in a simple program
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Straightforward question about the presence of PI in EFE.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: none
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Quantum Gravity 248.4: Japan Comes To Rescue With Kinetic Energy
  • From: rainbowbluerfoll
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: jimp
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Phantom
• The sun's rays
  • From: DarkMatter
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Traffic from selling cigarettes would get me evicted toot sweet.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Americans are racists. No We have been taken over
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Hydrodynamics
  • From: Tom
• Re: Is Einstein, Jr. Out There?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Straightforward question about the presence of PI in EFE.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Like it or not, death comes with birth.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Straightforward question about the presence of PI in EFE.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A blaster, anybody?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The time continuum
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Einstein, Jr. Out There?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The essense of General Relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A Real Theory and a Correct Theory
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• A Real Theory and a Correct Theory
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Is Einstein, Jr. Out There?
  • From: Smoron
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The time continuum
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: The time continuum
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Phantom
• Re: You have not answered any of my Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The time continuum
  • From: Sanny
• Like it or not, death comes with birth.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Hydrodynamics
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Quantum Gravity 248.4: Japan Comes To Rescue With Kinetic Energy
  • From: Krieg Suden
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Greg Neill
• A Effects Cause
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• A Golfing Implication of the Eagleson Effect
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Straightforward question about the presence of PI in EFE.
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Quanutm Gravity as Charge Analogy is OK
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Hydrodynamics
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Phantom
• Re: You have not answered any of my Question
  • From: Sanny
• Re: A prior i posteriori - the egg came first then the chicken
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Same tired bullshit!
  • From: Benj
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Send me the Formulla
  • From: none
• Re: Send me the Formulla
  • From: none
• Re: Quanutm Gravity as Charge Analogy is OK
  • From: Brit
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: A blaster, anybody?
  • From: Benj
• Re: A prior i posteriori - the egg came first then the chicken
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A prior i posteriori - the egg came first then the chicken
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Hydrodynamics
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: Straightforward question about the presence of PI in EFE.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You have not answered any of my Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A prior i posteriori - the egg came first then the chicken
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: PD
• A prior i posteriori
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins Corp....
  • From: davidmabus69
• Eagleson Effect- Patent Apllied For
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Total solar irradiance
  • From: Mike Jr.
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Esab
• Quanutm Gravity as Charge Analogy is OK
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Straightforward question about the presence of PI in EFE.
  • From: VTR250
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: In support of Henrik Svensmark
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Sanny
• Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Michael Helland
• You have not answered any of my Question
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Michael Helland
• A blaster, anybody?
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Send me the Formulla
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Send me the Formulla
  • From: Basti05b
• Send me the Formulla
  • From: Sanny
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: none
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: none
• Re: A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• A letter from a professor
  • From: Basti05b
• The time continuum
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: none
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: PD
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 248.4: Japan Comes To Rescue With Kinetic Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: PD
• Re: When did I ask for money ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: jjsajd
• When did I ask for money ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Phantom
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Dynamic particals
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What hath Einstein wrought?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Queerly, idiot savant Uncle Rect-Al was just killing time.
  • From: hanson
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• The essense of General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• The “ rich ” are never lonely.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity 248.2: Why the Riccati Equation Applies to Black Hole Infinite Force and Infinite Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 248.3: The Straight Line Between an Entirely Black Hole Universe and a Universe with No Black Holes contains no Intersecting Causes and Effects
  • From: OsherD
• Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Dynamic particals
  • From: tiagorez
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity inside a spherical shell in non-Euclidean space
  • From: George Smith
• Re: Eric Gisse, what were you doing in Seattle, interviewing for a job ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• X-ray generation - Absorption of x-rays inside the anode
  • From: Specsy
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Shouldn't the kilogram be defined in terms of its field ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The End of Times or the Best of Times
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Michael Helland
• Eric Gisse, what do you look like ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The End of Times or the Best of Times
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: First superheavy element found in nature
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric Gisse, what were you doing in Seattle, interviewing for a job ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Shouldn't the kilogram be defined in terms of its field ?
  • From: Darwin123
• The End of Times or the Best of Times
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Basti05b
• First superheavy element found in nature
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Speed of light as a rule, is consistent with SR within a few megaparsecs
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins Corp....
  • From: Benj
• Re: How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins Corp....
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: timo
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: PD
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: PD
• Queerly, idiot savant Uncle Rect-Al was just killing time.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Florian
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Phantom
• Re: We can't imagine nature as she truly is.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Eric Gisse, what were you doing in Seattle, interviewing for a job ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins Corp....
  • From: foolsrushin
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: none
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: none
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quantum Gravity 248.2: Why the Riccati Equation Applies to Black Hole Infinite Force and Infinite Energy
  • From: Krieg Suden
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: PD
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: We can't imagine nature as she truly is.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: PD
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Mike
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Esab
• First Law of Relativity
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Apr 28, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Florian
• Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
  • From: Androcles
• INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL SUPERCOMPUTING (OSC'08): Deadline extension
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: Quantum Gravity 248.2: Why the Riccati Equation Applies to Black Hole Infinite Force and Infinite Energy
  • From: Basti05b
• So where then is philosophy?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 248.2: Why the Riccati Equation Applies to Black Hole Infinite Force and Infinite Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Oh the simulated life
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 248.1: The Black Hole Infinite Energy and Finite Force Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Oh the simulated life
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• ilongfordarkness
  • From: fcache
• Oh the simulated life
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Basti05b
• We can't imagine nature as she truly is.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: 8pi (GMT2) Detecting time waves
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: 8pi (GMT2) Detecting time waves
  • From: rick_sobie
• InovaBrasil - 25_04_08 - ÍNDICE PARCIAL - (15 DE 60 matérias postadas )
  • From: Rogerio
• Containing fusion reactions
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The formula E = m c^2
  • From: none
• Re: 8pi (GMT2) Detecting time waves
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: What the hell is going on? Who is in charge here???
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Joe Avery
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Androcles
• 8pi (GMT2) Detecting time waves
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Riesz Representation Theorem -- sort of
  • From: JohnF
• The formula E = m c^2
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Dual of maxwell tensor as gauge curvature
  • From: Graven Water
• Uniform motion
  • From: Joe Avery
• Re: What the hell is going on? Who is in charge here???
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: What the hell is going on? Who is in charge here???
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: My New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Quantum Gravity 248.0: The Initial Object of Group Theory and Relative Velocity as Fundamental
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• love to show off in front of their webcams.
  • From: lucienhed
• love to show off in front of their webcams.
  • From: lucienhed
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Robert L. Park Friday 25 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Just for fun...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Famine will grip the land
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Riesz Representation Theorem -- sort of
  • From: Edward Green
• Quantum Gravity 247.9: Category Theory to the Half-Rescue on Zero Objects
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What hath Einstein wrought?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• t1 Means Run?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Quantum Gravity 247.8: Vaccum vs Null Vectors vs Vertex Operators vs Conformal Field Theory (CFT)
  • From: OsherD
• t1 and Implication in Nuclear Design
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Quantum Gravity is Simplified by t1
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Just for fun...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: One question about Maxwell's equations
  • From: Benj
• "Gravity"
  • From: Sreb
• Quantum Gravity 247.7: Physics, Subtraction, Division, 0, 1, and Their Similarities and Differences
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What hath Einstein wrought?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Robert L. Park Friday 25 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: What the hell is going on? Who is in charge here???
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Why do earth not Fall on Sun?
  • From: Dave Parker
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Robert L. Park Friday 25 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: New approach
  • From: kronecker
• All solution manuals you want are here
  • From: sms123
• Re: Robert L. Park Friday 25 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Robert L. Park Friday 25 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Robert L. Park Friday 25 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: New approach
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: doug
• Re: diamonds
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: diamonds
  • From: Basti05b
• If the field of the IPK was known precisely ( and consistently )..
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: diamonds
  • From: OG
• Re: diamonds
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: diamonds
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: diamonds
  • From: OG
• Re: diamonds
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: diamonds
  • From: OG
• What the hell is going on? Who is in charge here???
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Robert L. Park Friday 25 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What hath Einstein wrought?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: diamonds
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Experimental Status - emdrive/relativity drive experiment
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: diamonds
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experimental Status - emdrive/relativity drive experiment
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: diamonds
  • From: hanson
• Re: Robert L. Park Friday 25 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: New approach
  • From: Tom
• diamonds
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Experimental Status - emdrive/relativity drive experiment
  • From: Larry Snyder
• Re: Destroy Time Dimension?
  • From: Mike Bass
• Re: One question about Maxwell's equations
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• CMBR
  • From: Thomas Heger
• New approach
  • From: Larry Snyder
• Re: Experimental Status - emdrive/relativity drive experiment
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Experimental Status - emdrive/relativity drive experiment
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Quantum Gravity 247.6: E = mc^2 Approaches what as c --> infinity?
  • From: Basti05b
• black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: More complete explanation of the illusion of expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Back EMF Electrolysis?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: One question about Maxwell's equations
  • From: Igor
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins Corp....
  • From: davidmabus1999
• Re: Quantum Gravity 247.6: The Riccati Differential Equation is "Natural" For Expansion-Contraction Motion
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: John Dredla
• Re: Experimental Update- Emdrive/Relativity Drive- unspun
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Experimental Update- Emdrive/Relativity Drive- unspun
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: One question about Maxwell's equations
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The universe is surrounding the enterior of the 4th dimension
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity 247.6: E = mc^2 Approaches what as c --> infinity?
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Quantum Gravity 247.6: The Riccati Differential Equation is "Natural" For Expansion-Contraction Motion
  • From: Paul Mays
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Re: Bernoulli's Equation
  • From: Adam Gray
• Re: Robert L. Park Friday 25 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr.
• One question about Maxwell's equations
  • From: alb
• Re: Shouldn't the kilogram be defined in terms of its field ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shouldn't the kilogram be defined in terms of its field ?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn't be President:
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Bernoulli's Equation
  • From: tadchem
• What hath Einstein wrought?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Bernoulli's Equation
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Experimental Update- Emdrive/Relativity Drive- unspun
  • From: Tom M
• Re: Experimental Update- Emdrive/Relativity Drive- unspun
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Bernoulli's Equation
  • From: Adam Gray
• Re: Destroy Time Dimension?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL SUPERCOMPUTING (OSC'08): Deadline extension
  • From: laura
• Re: Quantum Gravity 247.6: The Riccati Differential Equation is "Natural" For Expansion-Contraction Motion
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 247.6: The Riccati Differential Equation is "Natural" For Expansion-Contraction Motion
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 247.6: E = mc^2 Approaches what as c --> infinity?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: #79 if Pulsars are alien planet Magnetospheres, then what are QUASARS?; biophysics trilogy book series: "Darwin Evolution replaced by Superdeterminism from Quantum Mechanics"
  • From: Grammar and Spelling Nazi
• Quantum Gravity 247.5: Justification of Measuring 0 Dual of Light as Numerically 0
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 247.4: Lesson 1 on Moving a Black Hole using "Infinite Speed" and a "Zero Dual" of the Former From Penrose Diagram
  • From: OsherD
• Shouldn't the kilogram be defined in terms of its field ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Destroy Time Dimension?
  • From: Mike Bass
• Re: Destroy Time Dimension?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Destroy Time Dimension?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Time is as fast as light
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Experimental Update- Emdrive/Relativity Drive- unspun
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Experimental Update- Emdrive/Relativity Drive- unspun
  • From: Uncle Al
• Robert L. Park Friday 25 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Destroy Time Dimension?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn't be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Destroy Time Dimension?
  • From: Mike Bass
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Experimental Update- Emdrive/Relativity Drive- unspun
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Back EMF Electrolysis?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Every object has an invisible / unblockable gravitational field.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Florian
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Florian
• Re: Back EMF Electrolysis?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Back EMF Electrolysis?
  • From: Tom
• Re: More complete explanation of the illusion of expansion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Darwin123
• In support of Henrik Svensmark
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Total solar irradiance
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: John Dredla
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: John Dredla
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: John Dredla
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: PD
• Re: Back EMF Electrolysis?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Temperature limit of human survival?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Abstract Relativity Causes E to Equal M C^2
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Gravity inside a spherical shell in non-Euclidean space
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Abstract Relativity Causes E to Equal M C^2
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: John Dredla
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: PD
• Re: Back EMF Electrolysis?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: Androcles
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: John Dredla
• Re: Time is as fast as light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: simple theory presentation
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• AUSTIN DWI
  • From: austindwi_lover
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: Androcles
• simple theory presentation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Practice problems
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tom Potter, how did you wind up in Beijing ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn't be President:
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Can a Black Hole Be Converted To a Wormhole?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Florian
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Florian
• Re: More complete explanation of the illusion of expansion
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: hanson
• Can a Black Hole Be Converted To a Wormhole?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: More complete explanation of the illusion of expansion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: More complete explanation of the illusion of expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Practice problems
  • From: John Dredla
• Re: More complete explanation of the illusion of expansion
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: More complete explanation of the illusion of expansion
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Edward Green
• What really matters ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• How would you model the gravitational field of a laser beam ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Tom Potter, how did you wind up in Beijing ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Every object has an invisible / unblockable gravitational field.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Back EMF Electrolysis?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: More complete explanation of the illusion of expansion
  • From: Uncle Al
• GREENHOUSE WARMING IS CLASSICAL
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Back EMF Electrolysis?
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Androcles
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 24 April 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Cute
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Time is as fast as light
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: General Relativity does Not predict black holes.
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Back EMF Electrolysis?
  • From: Tom
• Re: MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Cute
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Time is as fast as light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity inside a spherical shell in non-Euclidean space
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Radiant heat transfer
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Temperature limit of human survival?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• More complete explanation of the illusion of expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Gravity inside a spherical shell in non-Euclidean space
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Darwin123
• Gravity inside a spherical shell in non-Euclidean space
  • From: George Smith
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Work Proceeds- Experimental Status
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Temperature limit of human survival?
  • From: Swapnil Kale
• Re: Work Proceeds- Experimental Status
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Florian
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Work Proceeds- Experimental Status
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Richard Henry
• How many Neutrons out of the BB have yet Decayed?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Radiant heat transfer
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• power of electromagnetic rays used for prediction of RCS
  • From: broli
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Radiant heat transfer
  • From: Andy Energy
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Mike
• Re: MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Richard Henry
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: simple theory/forces
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A 4 thousand year old battle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: simple theory/standard model
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Multi-Segments Body Force
  • From: Korchkidu
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Benj
• Re: simple theory/standard model
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: greysky
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: General Relativity does Not predict black holes.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Hordes of Future Visitors: Is Hawking Right?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Cute
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Cute
• Re: Quantum Gravity 247.3: The PI "Inverse Metric" is Linearly Additive
  • From: OsherD
• General Relativity does Not predict black holes.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Quantum Gravity 247.3: The PI "Inverse Metric" is Linearly Additive
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 247.3: The PI "Inverse Metric" is Linearly Additive
  • From: OsherD
• Particle accelerator question
  • From: fcache
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Time slowdown
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simple theory
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: simple theory/gravity
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Cute
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: simple theory/galaxies
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
  • From: Cute
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Riesz Representation Theorem -- sort of
  • From: JohnF
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: Marcus Aurelius
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: New World Time Standard
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: simple theory/fields
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: New World Time Standard
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: New World Time Standard
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time slowdown
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time slowdown
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Multi-Segments Body Force
  • From: Korchkidu
• Re: Time slowdown
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: Time slowdown
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• New World Time Standard
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: System error in measurements?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Mike
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Mike
• System error in measurements?
  • From: onofftopic
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: Why My Drive Will Alter the Earth
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Why My Drive Will Alter the Earth
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn?t be President:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: Huang
• Re: Time slowdown or Speeding up ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: simple theory/standard model
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Re: simple theory/the fox
  • From: Florian
• MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simple theory/gravity
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: simple theory/the fox
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: simple theory/Cuvilinear Distance Analysis
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/fluid calculations
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: simple theory/what to do
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Quantum Gravity 247.1: The Fundamental Set in Gravito-Electric Rotating Dust
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 247.2: How Weyl Went Beyond Einstein To Electro-Gravitational Theory
  • From: OsherD
• physics information from India
  • From: bhupender
• Re: simple theory/Isomaps
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: simple theory/curvilinear space
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Re: Quantum Gravity 247.1: The Fundamental Set in Gravito-Electric Rotating Dust
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why My Drive Will Alter the Earth
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 247.1: The Fundamental Set in Gravito-Electric Rotating Dust
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time slowdown
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Uncle Al doesn't think Mitch is an idiot.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Uncle Al doesn't think Mitch is an idiot.
  • From: Rushtown
• Re: Time slowdown
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: Why My Drive Will Alter the Earth
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why My Drive Will Alter the Earth
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Abstract Entrophy Equation
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: !!!! Further Many More Details on AUSTIN DWIATTORNERY etc...... !!!!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Uncle Al doesn't think Mitch is an idiot.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Iran -- Keep your enemies close but your friends closer
  • From: hanson
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Measurement of Gravitomagnetic and Acceleration Fields Around ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Black Holes and gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why My Drive Will Alter the Earth
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why My Drive Will Alter the Earth
  • From: Tommy1792
• Re: Critical Reynolds Number
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Intelligent Design: Required by Biological Life?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: The universe is surrounding the enterior of the 4th dimension
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Iran -- Keep your enemies close but your friends
  • From: hanson
• Re: The universe is surrounding the enterior of the 4th dimension
  • From: Benj
• Picture of Hawking in zero-G
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Abstract Entrophy Equation
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: A Profound Relativistic Cross-section is Disclosed
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why My Drive Will Alter the Earth
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why My Drive Will Alter the Earth
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Uncle Al doesn't think Mitch is an idiot.
  • From: Rushtown
• Why My Drive Will Alter the Earth
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• The universe is surrounding the enterior of the 4th dimension
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Uncle Al doesn't think Mitch is an idiot.
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• A Profound Relativistic Cross-section is Disclosed
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Yanick Toutain
• Re: Faraday's law and Lenz's rule?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Faraday's law and Lenz's rule?
  • From: onofftopic
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: ELECTROPOSITRON MODELS : H, H2, H2+, H3+, HH_( halfantihydrogen )
  • From: Enes
• Re: Provisional Patent Applied- Rotated EMDRIVE Field
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Provisional Patent Applied- Rotated EMDRIVE Field
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Provisional Patent Applied- Rotated EMDRIVE Field
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Uncle Al doesn't think Mitch is an idiot.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Message from the Global Consciousness
  • From: johnjones . lald
• Re: Time slowdown
  • From: Androcles
• Provisional Patent Applied- Rotated EMDRIVE Field
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Sreb
• Re: simple theory/Operators
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Time slowdown
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Rotating Disk Gravity Anomally Question
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Secret of Dark Matter ??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Rotating Disk Gravity Anomally Question
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Stainless Steel Negative Resistor
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Andromeda Galaxy = Life ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light falls in time; it changes energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn?t be President:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: simple theory/Operators
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: simple theory/angles
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 247.0: More Re "Fundamental Set" {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}
  • From: OsherD
• A 4 thousand year old battle.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Uncle Al doesn't think Mitch is an idiot.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Uncle Al doesn't think Mitch is an idiot.
  • From: Rushtown
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: !!!! Further Many More Details on AUSTIN DWIATTORNERY etc...... !!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: â?o www.Caballista.ORG â?? has been offline for 1.5 months now.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• !!!! Further Many More Details on AUSTIN DWIATTORNERY etc...... !!!!
  • From: ammandagray
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: Quantum Gravity 246.0: Italians Answer: Can Something Have Physical Relevance or Exist Without Conveying Information?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 246.0: Italians Answer: Can Something Have Physical Relevance or Exist Without Conveying Information?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: simple theory/quantum mechanics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/Righthanded hydrogen
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: Yanick Toutain
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: Yanick Toutain
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• A Letter To Churchill College, Cambridge
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Quantum Gravity 246.0: Italians Answer: Can Something Have Physical Relevance or Exist Without Conveying Information?
  • From: Krieg Suden
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Uncle Al
• Chemmol.com is a USA Web Services Company with primary focus on creating a web-based, searchable Molecular Structure Database for you.
  • From: myhouseinfo
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: BradGuth
• “ www.Caballista.ORG ” has been offline for 1.5 months now.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: Androcles
• Re: God Save GW Bush
  • From: CWatters
• Re: simple theory
  • From: PD
• Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: simple theory/Why three generations?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: Camilo
• Re: Shawyer Drive or Emdrive WILL Likely Lift a Light Vehicle.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn?t be President:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: See the holy spirit:
  • From: Androcles
• Re: simple theory/inertia
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: uri
• Re: simple theory/beta decay
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/galaxies
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: uri
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Florian
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Apr 21, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Science Comic Series For Creative Children Published From Singapore - Visit www.theyoungscientists.in
  • From: The Young Scientists
• Re: The Science Jokes Wiki
  • From: The Young Scientists
• Science Comic Series For Creative Children Published From Singapore - Visit www.theyoungscientists.in
  • From: The Young Scientists
• Science Comic Series For Creative Children Published From Singapore - Visit www.theyoungscientists.in
  • From: The Young Scientists
• Re: simple theory/charge
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/Tajmar
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: simple theory/black holes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/what is space?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: simple theory/what is space?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Quantum Gravity 246.2: More On the Italians
  • From: OsherD
• Re: simple theory/tunig the model
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Quantum Gravity 246.1: More On Knowledge vs Information
  • From: OsherD
• Re: simple theory/superconductivity
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/quantum mechanics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/object oriented physics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Quantum Gravity 246.0: Italians Answer: Can Something Have Physical Relevance or Exist Without Conveying Information?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: simple theory/entropy
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/reality
  • From: Sam Wormley
• God Save GW Bush
  • From: Huang
• Re: simple theory/simplicity
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/solids
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: simple theory/visualization
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/reality
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/Righthanded hydrogen
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 246.0: Italians Answer: Can Something Have Physical Relevance or Exist Without Conveying Information?
  • From: Krieg Suden
• Re: simple theory/solids
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory/Righthanded hydrogen
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: john
• Re: simple theory/fields
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Some Loose Thoughts About The Choice Of String Vacuum Or Physical Scenario
  • From: charleskmhui
• Quantum Gravity 246.0: Italians Answer: Can Something Have Physical Relevance or Exist Without Conveying Information?
  • From: OsherD
• Science Comic Series For Creative Children Published From Singapore - Visit www.theyoungscientists.in
  • From: theyoungscientists
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: tadchem
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Ivan P.
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Tom
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Ivan P.
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: False Patents
  • From: Tom
• Re: False Patents
  • From: Tom
• lacoste trainers anya hindmarch bag at www.wearempire.cn
  • From: wearempire13
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Ivan P.
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: hanson
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: simple theory
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: John Park
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: Androcles
• Re: " THe End " or " Game Over " ? Try to translate cosmic language.
  • From: Enes
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: ORBITAL MECHANICS
  • From: hanson
• Re: False Patents
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: simple theory
  • From: PD
• Re: ORBITAL MECHANICS
  • From: PD
• Re: ORBITAL MECHANICS
  • From: hanson
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: Camilo
• Re: False Patents
  • From: Thomas Heger
• ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: ACE
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: simple theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instant/Faster-than-light communications (and SETI)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: Dr Physics
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: simple theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: " THe End " or " Game Over " ? Try to translate cosmic language.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: uri
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: My New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Enes
• Re: Quasar tests general relativity to the limit
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Instant/Faster-than-light communications (and SETI)
  • From: Jason H.
• Gravity is photons?
  • From: gubbenimanen
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Edward Green
• Heavy water: Why other chemical/physical properties than light water?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: Camilo
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: uri
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: uri
• Quantum Gravity 245.9: The "Axiom of Quantum Gravity" or of "Unification"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Quantum Gravity 245.9: Contradiction Between Definition of Probability and Finite Constant Speed of Light c
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: jimp
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Quantum Gravity 245.8: When Do Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Conditional Probability Differ "Maximally"?
  • From: OsherD
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Semi-coherent light is detectable as a semi-particle, semi-wave.
  • From: BradGuth
• simple theory
  • From: Thomas Heger
• " THe End " or " Game Over " ? Try to translate cosmic language.
  • From: Enes
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn?t be President:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quasar tests general relativity to the limit
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Androcles
• Is it possible to disprove phenomenalism?
  • From: uri
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: water, elevation and energy
  • From: CWatters
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity 245.7: When Does P(A-->B) = P(B|A), or P ' (A-->B) = P ' (B|A)?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quasar tests general relativity to the limit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Semi-coherent light is detectable as a semi-particle,semi-wave.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quasar tests general relativity to the limit
  • From: hanson
• Re: water, elevation and energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quasar tests general relativity to the limit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quasar tests general relativity to the limit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: water, elevation and energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• water, elevation and energy
  • From: md
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: Camilo
• Re: Help with problem
  • From: Tony
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: Camilo
• Conservation of Energy Law Invalidates Einstein (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: John Archibald Wheeler 1911-2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: John Archibald Wheeler 1911-2008
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Help with problem
  • From: TBoy
• Re: Help with problem
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intelligent Design: Required by Biological Life?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: Adam
• Re: practical demagnetization
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: hanson
• Help with problem
  • From: TBoy
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Enes
• Re: FBI Disclosure- DOug Screwed UP, Case NUmber 08-631 BPG
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: FBI Disclosure- DOug Screwed UP, Case NUmber 08-631 BPG
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: False Patents
  • From: Tom
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: jimp
• Re: My New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Intelligent Design: Required by Biological Life?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Quantum Gravity 245.6: Alternating Sign Expressions From Subtraction
  • From: OsherD
• practical demagnetization
  • From: Camilo
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: False Patents
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 245.5: Eisenhart's "Subtractive" Unified Field Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Ivan P.
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Ivan P.
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: An honest assessment of Darwinism
  • From: Jong Kim
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: Dark matter may have been found on earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 245.4: Subtraction vs Multiplication in Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn?t be President:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Andromeda Galaxy = Life ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Where the universe is.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Semi-coherent light is detectable as a semi-particle, semi-wave.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What do Jews have to do with it ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Enes
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Enes
• Re: Drawing immigrants.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Quantum Gravity 245.3: Doesn't "Given" in Conditional Probability Capture An Aspect of Causation?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 245.2: Quantum Field Theory Has Deep Difficulties
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 245.1: The Conditional Probability Case
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 245.0: Causation in PI, Conditional Probability, QFT, GR
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Discovered an amazing meditation secret
  • From: john
• Re: False Patents
  • From: Tom
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Dark matter may have been found on earth
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: please help me think about a billion-year-old meter stick
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Dark matter - stay tuned
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Dark matter may have been found on earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: False Patents
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• False Patents
  • From: Tom
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Dark matter may have been found on earth
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: Discovered an amazing meditation secret
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: UV transmission
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Drawing immigrants.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Rotating Disk Gravity Anomally Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Second Family of High-Temperature Superconductors Discovered
  • From: Uncle Al
• Rotating Disk Gravity Anomally Question
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Second Family of High-Temperature Superconductors Discovered
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Advanced Shawyer Drive- Asymmetric Graviton Fields are Highly Likly REAL
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Shawyer Drive or Emdrive WILL Likely Lift a Light Vehicle.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Music Builds Bridges in the Brain
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: An honest assessment of Darwinism
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• John Archibald Wheeler 1911-2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• An honest assessment of Darwinism
  • From: Jong Kim
• Shawyer Drive or Emdrive WILL Likely Lift a Light Vehicle.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Enes
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Ciit
• Fine structure constant measured to high precision
  • From: PD
• A True Fission Function- Disclosure
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: What do Jews have to do with it ?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• World Neutron Standards
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Red Shift as Dark Matter Effect
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Florian
• Re: What do Jews have to do with it ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Germany remains the most productive nation on the planet.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Florian
• Re: Forces get their energy
  • From: Dr Physics
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Pmb
• physicsworld.com newswire (Week 16)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 17 April 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Androcles
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Stanley Meyer
  • From: Tom
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: Igor
• Re: Dark matter - stay tuned
  • From: Igor
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Ivan P.
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Ciit
• OMG
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Galileo transformation
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Dark matter - stay tuned
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Atoms
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Enes
• Galileo transformation
  • From: Ivan P.
• Galileo transformation
  • From: Ivan P.
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Enes
• FBI Disclosure- DOug Screwed UP, Case NUmber 08-631 BPG
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Dark matter - stay tuned
  • From: PD
• Re: Atoms
  • From: PD
• Re: Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: PD
• Re: please help me think about a billion-year-old meter stick
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Ten more reasons Obama shouldn’t be President:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ELECTROPOSITRON MODELS : H, H2, H2+, H3+, HH_( halfantihydrogen )
  • From: Enes
• Re: Atoms
  • From: PD
• picture
  • From: john
• Stanley Meyer
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ELECTROPOSITRON MODELS : H, H2, H2+, H3+, HH_( halfantihydrogen )
  • From: john
• Re: ELECTROPOSITRON MODELS : H, H2, H2+, H3+, HH_( halfantihydrogen )
  • From: Enes
• What do Jews have to do with it ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Opinions on the new Feynman Lectures?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: objectoriented physics
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Efficienct? electrolysis.
  • From: Tom
• free materials about atomic structure, relativity, gravitation, etc
  • From: cosofrets
• Journal Special Issue on Control and Intelligent Systems in Humanitarian Technologies
  • From: Baten
• Re: Efficienct? electrolysis.
  • From: CWatters
• objectoriented physics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Computing current between two points from a given resistivity map
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: please help me think about a billion-year-old meter stick
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 244.0: Greece Relates Birds' Magnetic Flight "Perception-Steering" To Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: please help me think about a billion-year-old meter stick
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: please help me think about a billion-year-old meter stick
  • From: Sam Wormley
• please help me think about a billion-year-old meter stick
  • From: Matt
• Re: Opinions on the new Feynman Lectures?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Computing current between two points from a given resistivity map
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Computing current between two points from a given resistivity map
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 243.8: Did Life Cause the Last Acceleration (5 - 6 billion years ago)?
  • From: Krieg Suden
• Computing current between two points from a given resistivity map
  • From: Gradient
• We are just Stupid
  • From: Tom
• Efficienct? electrolysis.
  • From: Tom
• Re: Opinions on the new Feynman Lectures?
  • From: eratosthenes
• Re: we have a lot of solutions manual about 700 solutions manual
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Solving Schrödinger's equation numericallz
  • From: tadchem
• Re: UV transmission
  • From: jimp
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: UV transmission
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: UV transmission
  • From: jimp
• Re: UV transmission
  • From: Eric Gisse
• UV transmission
  • From: Tom Del Rosso
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: True Philosophers and Thought
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: none
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Entropy. / My opinion /.
  • From: socratus
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Benj
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 861 April 15, 2008 www.aip.org/pnuFINDING THE HIGGS BOSON
  • From: none
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Opinions on the new Feynman Lectures?
  • From: greysky
• Re: True Philosophers and Thought
  • From: PD
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 861 April 15, 2008 www.aip.org/pnuFINDING THE HIGGS BOSON
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 861 April 15, 2008 www.aip.org/pnuFINDING THE HIGGS BOSON
  • From: Michael Helland
• Solving Schrödinger's equation numericallz
  • From: Daniel Kraft
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: ORBITAL MECHANICS
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: True Philosophers and Thought
  • From: Lester Zick
• ORBITAL MECHANICS
  • From: ACE
• Re: Wind power plant
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: none
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 243.9: The Null Set May Be "Lower Dimensional"
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 243.8: Did Life Cause the Last Acceleration (5 - 6 billion years ago)?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Traveler
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Re: Atoms
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Atoms
  • From: Thomas Heger
• !!!! Further Many More Details on AUSTIN DWIATTORNERY etc...... !!!!
  • From: latasia . ward
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Wind power plant
  • From: Krieg Suden
• Re: My New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Prototype gravitational-wave detector uses squeezed light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• all solution manuals you want are here
  • From: manual solution for all
• we have a lot of solutions manual about 700 solutions manual
  • From: manual solution for all
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: BioFreak
• Further More Details on AUSTIN DWIATTORNERY etc......
  • From: shenise . jonshon
• Re: A Machine to Cause a Tree To Branch
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Testing quantum gravity at the LHC
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Wind power plant
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Wind power plant
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Wind power plant
  • From: jimp
• Re: True Philosophers and Thought
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 242.9: What Would An Arbitrary Part of the Universe Perceive?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wind power plant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Wind power plant
  • From: robert . janczak
• Re: Calculate force given power
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Quantum Gravity 242.8: Does E = mc^2 + integration/discrimination?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: True Philosophers and Thought
  • From: hanson
• Re: A Two to RGB Color Conversion Function in Greek Atom Theory.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 242.7: Intermission on Pluralism vs Individualism
  • From: OsherD
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Calculate force given power
  • From: Gareth
• Re: A Two to RGB Color Conversion Function in Greek Atom Theory.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: True Philosophers and Thought
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Two to RGB Color Conversion Function in Greek Atom Theory.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: True Philosophers and Thought
  • From: tadchem
• Re: radar cross section of an object
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: My New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• radar cross section of an object
  • From: broli
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Letting everyone have what he needs without working
  • From: jimp
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Edward Green
• Further More Details on AUSTIN DWI ATTORNERY etc......
  • From: staylageorge
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Empty space and empty time?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why I Write for oNly 2 Percent of the Readers.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What will happen?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time curvature is math
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: True Philosophers and Thought
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: Uncle Al
• ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: ACE
• A Two to RGB Color Conversion Function in Greek Atom Theory.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Greek Atoms or the Greek Differential
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• True Philosophers and Thought
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why I Write for oNly 2 Percent of the Readers.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why I Write for oNly 2 Percent of the Readers.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Why I Write for oNly 2 Percent of the Readers.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Ciit
• Betting on the dark horse.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Physicists discover the 'superinsulator'
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Quantum Gravity 242.7: Intermission on Pluralism vs Individualism
  • From: Krieg Suden
• Re: A Machine to Cause a Tree To Branch
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• A Machine to Cause a Tree To Branch
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Capitalist Skank Whores "Yahoo", "Microsoft" get it on!!!
  • From: uri
• Re: Letting everyone have what he needs without working
  • From: uri
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: PD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Iraqis lost territory to idiot Jews like Rabbi Bush ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: My New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Testing quantum gravity at the LHC
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Calculate force given power
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Quantum Gravity 242.7: Intermission on Pluralism vs Individualism
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 242.6: Is "Averaging" (Expectations) the Same as Integrating (Finding Similarities)?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 242.5: Discrimination (Distinguishing between stimuli) in Psychology vs PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: greysky
• These are part of our solutions not shown here , if the solution you
  • From: sms123
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Calculate force given power
  • From: DavidBrown314
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: greysky
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: Huang
• Re: Calculate force given power
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Calculate force given power
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: R Shiein
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Calculate force given power
  • From: DavidBrown314
• Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: EINSTEIN WAS WRONG
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: Front Office
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: Front Office
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• Re: Letting everyone have what he needs without working
  • From: jimp
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: tadchem
• Re: EINSTEIN WAS WRONG
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Letting everyone have what he needs without working
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• Re: Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: SBC Yahoo
• Re: EINSTEIN WAS WRONG
  • From: PD
• Any physicist care to speculate about this idea?
  • From: gb
• EINSTEIN WAS WRONG
  • From: ACE
• Re: Letting everyone have what he needs without working
  • From: jimp
• Re: Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Letting everyone have what he needs without working
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Letting everyone have what he needs without working
  • From: uri
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: none
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Is there a difference between conservation of energy and conservation of weight and conservation of physics?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: stuck on scintillators
  • From: jfisher864
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: kronecker
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• 8-bit Unicode ( UTF-8 ) for Uncle Albert.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: How could we ? get along ? better ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Speed Of Light In Different Dimensions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: stuck on scintillators
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is there a difference between conservation of energy and conservation of weight and conservation of physics?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: none
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Ciit
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• How could we “ get along ” better ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Quantum Gravity 243.7: Expansion-Contraction as Charge-Reversal
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Who else is listening to you, understanding you ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Quantum Gravity 243.6: Can Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Reverse Its Charge?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: PD
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: The Speed Of Light In Different Dimensions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Double slit experiment
  • From: Androcles
• The Speed Of Light In Different Dimensions
  • From: GoldenHeart
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Apr 14, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Double slit experiment
  • From: mmm901
• Re: The Universe as a Klein bottle self-manifesting time-process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Quantum Gravity 243.5: Quantum Gravity Debate Appears To Leave Only Newton and Faraday/Ampere Standing
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Universe as a Klein bottle self-manifesting time-process
  • From: Dave
• Re: The Universe as a Klein bottle self-manifesting time-process
  • From: Dave
• Re: stuck on scintillators
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Is there a difference between conservation of energy and conservation of weight and conservation of physics?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• stuck on scintillators
  • From: entropy429
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: none
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: My New Math
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Universe as a Klein bottle self-manifesting time-process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: My New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The Universe as a Klein bottle self-manifesting time-process
  • From: Dave
• My New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: simple movement of electron
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Is there a difference between conservation of energy and conservation of weight and conservation of physics?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: Edward Green
• Latest passages youtube
  • From: ahmad
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Sam Wormley
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 11 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Is there a difference between conservation of energy and conservation of weight and conservation of physics?
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: tadchem
• Need grad student for review
  • From: Nicholas
• Quantum Gravity 243.4: Faraday's Law and Its Gravitomagnetic Analog Via Probable Correlation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: Front Office
• Re: Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: Front Office
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Alpha and THE REACTION
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Alot Can Be Done with 10 USEC.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Iraqis lost territory to idiot Jews like Rabbi Bush ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: kronecker
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• A refutation of anarcho-primitivism
  • From: uri
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Enes
• Re: ELECTROPOZYTRON
  • From: Enes
• Re: Critical Reynolds Number
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Non-Explosive Compression Nuclear Weapons
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Munchausen by Proxy
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: ELECTROPOZYTRON
  • From: Androcles
• Who else is listening to you, understanding you ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Cutix
• The Universe Revealed!!!
  • From: GoldenHeart
• Re: ELECTROPOZYTRON
  • From: Enes
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Tom Potter
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Nev
• Re: The Universe as a Klein bottle self-manifesting time-process
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Trail of Tears.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Trail of Tears.
  • From: Tom Potter
• The Universe as a Klein bottle self-manifesting time-process
  • From: Dave
• Re: Non-Explosive Compression Nuclear Weapons
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Non-Explosive Compression Nuclear Weapons
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Walking and the Curb
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: ELECTROPOZYTRON
  • From: Androcles
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Walking and the Curb
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• whoever has got...
  • From: katastrofa_nadfioletu
• The sun produces muon neutrinos flux without neutrino oscillations.
  • From: dan
• The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Galaxies
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Detecting acceleration.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Objects don't exist in spacetime, they Are spacetime.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• ELECTROPOZYTRON
  • From: Enes
• Re: The Trail of Tears.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The Trail of Tears.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: simple movement of electron
  • From: natanr123
• Re: The plane of our solar system.
  • From: Ben newsam
• Quantum Gravity 243.3: The Top 15 USA Universities
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 243.2: Gravitoelectromagnetics Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Cutix
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• A simple summary of simple observations in climate.
  • From: Edward Green
• About that IPCC website
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: hanson
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• The plane of our solar system.
  • From: kronecker
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Detecting acceleration.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Quantum Gravity 243.1: U. Missouri Columbia Missouri USA Now Among Top 15 USA Universities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Androcles
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Walking and the Curb
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Symmetry and Life
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Walking and the Curb
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Walking and the Curb
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Symmetry and Life
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: simple movement of electron
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Cutix
• InovaBrasil - 11_04_08 - ÍNDICE PARCIAL - (15 de 58 matérias postadas )
  • From: Rogerio
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Best websites on Physics.
  • From: Agent Smith
• ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: ACE
• Re: simple movement of electron
  • From: natanr123
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: simple movement of electron
  • From: PD
• My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Ron Mallett
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: PD
• Re: Aether is the empty space on which the Universe sits
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Ron Mallett
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • From: Ian Parker
• Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: Front Office
• Re: Question on the Energy Cost of Iron Reduction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: Front Office
• Re: The Trail of Tears.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Nev
• Tech men always carry batteries
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Tom
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Tom
• Re: Doppler Analogy for Wavefunction Collapse
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Doppler Analogy for Wavefunction Collapse
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Doppler Analogy for Wavefunction Collapse
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Doppler Analogy for Wavefunction Collapse
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Doppler Analogy for Wavefunction Collapse
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Doppler Analogy for Wavefunction Collapse
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Cutix
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Trail of Tears.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Galileo knew no clock.. yet he knew c was a universal constant ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Best websites on Physics.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• simple movement of electron
  • From: natanr123
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What are the units of gravitational potential energy?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Need answer to certain queries
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Need answer to certain queries
  • From: jimp
• Need answer to certain queries
  • From: gigglie
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: What are the units of gravitational potential energy?
  • From: bclark76
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: hanson
• Re: Over-consumption is bad for the health of the global economy.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Ron Mallett
  • From: kronecker
• Galileo knew no clock.. yet he knew c was a universal constant ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• good price !!! china wholesale mauri sneakers cheap artful dodger evisu ed hardy hoody jeans etc
  • From: myshoesbiz98
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Detecting acceleration.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Best websites on Physics.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Cutix
• Re: your big-screen is a 2D aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: your big-screen is a 2D aether
  • From: john
• Re: What are the units of gravitational potential energy?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Tom
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What are the units of gravitational potential energy?
  • From: Randy Poe
• I didn't write the laws that give single mothers such a nice ride.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• What are the units of gravitational potential energy?
  • From: bclark76
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Over-consumption is bad for the health of the global economy.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Over-consumption is bad for the health of the global economy.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Best websites on Physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: PD
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: hanson
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: your big-screen is a 2D aether
  • From: Igor
• Re: Best websites on Physics.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Best websites on Physics.
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Over-consumption is bad for the health of the global economy.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Ron Mallett
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Best websites on Physics.
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Gravity"
  • From: Nev
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: hanson
• Re: paying for his solving (problems related to electromagnatics)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: hanson
• Ron Mallett
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Best websites on Physics.
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: DrollTroll
• Re: your big-screen is a 2D aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: your big-screen is a 2D aether
  • From: john
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: your big-screen is a 2D aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: your big-screen is a 2D aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Darwin123
• Diamond question
  • From: Front Office
• Re: your big-screen is a 2D aether
  • From: john
• Re: your big-screen is a 2D aether
  • From: john
• your big-screen is a 2D aether
  • From: john
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: DrollTroll
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: DrollTroll
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: John Park
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Cutix
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Tom
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: paying for his solving (problems related to electromagnatics)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The secret of the ages
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: entanglement
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: entanglement
  • From: Chris
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL SUPERCOMPUTING (OSC'08)
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Testing quantum gravity at the LHC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: Where is the Centre of the Universe?
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: none
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Tom
• Re: Fight, Run, or Submit.
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: RichD
• Re: Bob Laza's fraudulent video
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• get manual solution study guide
  • From: manual solution for all
• Re: Objects don't exist in spacetime, they Are spacetime.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Bob Laza's fraudulent video
  • From: Pmb
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Tom
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: hanson
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: John Park
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: hanson
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: xxein
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Tom
• manual solution solution manual study guide
  • From: sms123
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Tom
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Tom
• Re: The secret of the ages
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: THE MECHJANICS OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• a second, very simple, result in climate theory
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Where is the Centre of the Universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Cutix
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE MECHJANICS OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Bob Remeaux
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Androcles
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: Al Gore is a disgrace
  • From: hanson
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: none
• The Trail of Tears.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Bob Remeaux
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: PD
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: PD
• Re: Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• The secret of the ages
  • From: Anonymous Sender
• Re: Al Gore is a disgrace
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Diamond question
  • From: Jean
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • From: Edward Green
• THE MECHJANICS OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: ACE
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: PD
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Potter ignorant of facts, Gibson drunk
  • From: sendmesomemorespam40
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: hanson
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Nev
• Is Einstein and Jesus one person??
  • From: Cutix
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: PD
• A third observation on global climate
  • From: Tom
• Subscribe FREE Physics and Technical Magazines
  • From: EngineerEDGE
• Munchausen by Proxy
  • From: Tom
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Androcles
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Tom
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: PD
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Tom_Potter's half-asleep delusions.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Over-consumption is bad for the health of the global economy.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • From: Ian Parker
• Quantum Gravity 243.0: Riemann Zeta Function Related to SL(2, Z), Rational Numbers, and the 2 x 2 Matrix with 0 Diagonal and remaining Entries 1 and -1
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 242.3: Hausdorff and Locally Compact Hausdorff Spaces
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 242.4: Entanglement in PI Relates to the Non-Subtraction of "Reverse Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Potter ignorant of facts, Gibson drunk
  • From: Kunt100
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reason why perpetual motion cannot generate energy.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: DrollTroll
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Perpetual motion!
  • From: Tom
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Tom
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: A second observation on global climate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Tom
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: PD
• A second observation on global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Aether is the empty space on which the Universe sits
  • From: Laurent
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Tom
• Re: Bob Laza's fraudulent video
  • From: Tom
• The current Dalai Lama has 15 siblings.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Tom
• Economists have it all wrong, I can't move to a farm in Africa, I'd die.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: On 9/11, why did WTC 7 fall down?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Darwin123
• Over-consumption is bad for the health of the global economy.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• They're rejected by everyone ( half insane ), left to their own devices.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: I couldn't believe my eyes
  • From: Michael Helland
• Fight, Run, or Submit.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: PD
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: owen
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• Objects don't exist in spacetime, they Are spacetime.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• A first calculation in global climate
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Androcles
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: Androcles
• Magents and energy Part 2
  • From: Tom
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: PD
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Critical Reynolds Number
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: I couldn't believe my eyes
  • From: CWatters
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: PD
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: PD
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: none
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: PD
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: PD
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: jimp
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Ben newsam
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: PD
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Quantum Gravity 242.3: Hausdorff and Locally Compact Hausdorff Spaces
  • From: Mary
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: PD
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Igor
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: none
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: PD
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Oops ... posted global warming hiccup to wrong group
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativistic Newtonian bosons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tom_Potter's half-asleep delusions.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: To find force exerted at a point
  • From: anju_t85
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Nev
• Re: Interaction Between Four Fundamental Forces?
  • From: Kumar
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: PD
• china wholesale cheap gucci dior chanel handbags sneakers sunglasses etc
  • From: myshoesbiz95
• Re: To find force exerted at a point
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Relativistic Newtonian bosons
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Calculating our motion through space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why Were We Created?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Interaction Between Four Fundamental Forces?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: Androcles
• To find force exerted at a point
  • From: anju_t85
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Where is Jack Sarfatti?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Relativistic Newtonian bosons
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: DrollTroll
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Relativistic Newtonian bosons
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Hating Scientologists and Scientology is THE SAME as hating Jews and Judaism
  • From: Androcles
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Carnot efficiency and solar cells, etc.
  • From: DrollTroll
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: mitchgrav
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Quantum Gravity 242.3: Hausdorff and Locally Compact Hausdorff Spaces
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 242.2: Entanglement Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Cosmic religious feeling
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Slap n' tickle Next Generation Internet
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Slap n' tickle Next Generation Internet
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Slap n' tickle
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Slap n' tickle
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: I couldn't believe my eyes
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where is Jack Sarfatti?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Magnets = Energy?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Where is Jack Sarfatti?
  • From: Huang
• Re: Slap n' tickle
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Where is Jack Sarfatti?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Slap n' tickle
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Slap n' tickle
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Where is Jack Sarfatti?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Alejandro Rivero
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: none
• Re: Slap n' tickle
  • From: rick_sobie
• Slap n' tickle
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Eric Gisse
• SELF-FORMING RINGS AND CAGES
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: Sam Wormley
• natural/resonant frequency of water molecules
  • From: ssylee
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: jimp
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: none
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Igor
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: Randall@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: I couldn't believe my eyes
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: paying for his solving (problems related to electromagnatics)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: black holes and poetry
  • From: Uncle Al
• help needed: watt/sec ?!?
  • From: Randall@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to build a quantum computer and time machine.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Kunt100
• Re: I couldn't believe my eyes
  • From: Androcles
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Nev
• Re: paying for his solving (problems related to electromagnatics)
  • From: PD
• Re: Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: PD
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: PD
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: It's de-facto owners asserting their rights, not â?o Jews waging wars â??.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Tom Potter
• The George W. Bush GPS system
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Tom_Potter's half-asleep delusions.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Dropping Coriolis Like a Feather (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• paying for his solving (problems related to electromagnatics)
  • From: ahmed_hus
• Re: Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Time can not exist unless space expands or contracts.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Mathematical time travel and quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• black holes and poetry
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Time can not exist unless space expands or contracts.
  • From: Nasty Discharge
• Quantum Gravity 242.1: Quantum Discrimination, Entanglement, Memory, Unentanglement
  • From: OsherD
• I couldn't believe my eyes
  • From: Jean
• Time can not exist unless space expands or contracts.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: New theory time trave and how to build quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Kunt100
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Androcles
• New theory time trave and how to build quantum computers
  • From: reactor1967
• New theory time travel and quantum computer
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Debye Diffusion Constant and Einstein Relation
  • From: ssylee
• Re: How to build a quantum computer and time machine.
  • From: reactor1967
• Weight (mass) distribution formula
  • From: Yanick Poirier
• Re: Tom_Potter's half-asleep delusions.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Critical Reynolds Number
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Darwin123
• How to build a quantum computer and time machine.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: hanson
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: terrylhewettsr
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's the matter with antimatter?
  • From: Cutix
• Re: 100% efficiency
  • From: kronecker
• I care about who I want to read next, not who I don't want.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Aether is the empty space on which the Universe sits
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What's the matter with antimatter?
  • From: tadchem
• It's de-facto owners asserting their rights, not “ Jews waging wars ”.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Tom_Potter's half-asleep delusions.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Igor
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: none
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: CWatters
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Navier-Strokes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: F . Art . Ingatu
• Re: Navier-Strokes
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: none
• Re: Does Gravitational Force Differ?
  • From: Kumar
• Re: Navier-Strokes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Nev
• Senator's Perogavative- New Security Plans are Needed.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Senator Biden's Class of Weapons
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Navier-Strokes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Navier-Strokes
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Cutix
• Re: Gravity and change of motion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: PD
• Navier-Strokes
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Micro time is fluctuating
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: PD
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Mel Gibson: â?o Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world â??.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: What's the matter with antimatter?
  • From: Cutix
• Re: Does Gravitational Force Differ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: PD
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: 100% efficiency
  • From: Tom
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Agent Smith
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Apr 07, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Mother of all geniuses
  • From: Cutix
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Kunt100
• Quantum Gravity 242.0: Causal Sets in arXiv
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 241.92: More Again on E(X-->Y)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Kunt100
• Re: Mother of all geniuses
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 241.91: More Regarding E(X-->Y) vs PD, PIn
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 241.9: Relationship Between E(X-->Y), PIn (PI-Integration), PD (PI-Discrimination)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: hanson
• Re: War is about governments and landlords evicting unwanted guests.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: 100% efficiency
  • From: kronecker
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: PD
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: F . Art . Ingatu
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Tom
• Re: 100% efficiency
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Tom
• Trouble with Women? The PICKUP ARTIST SEASON 2!!
  • From: Impossible Casting
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Tom
• Re: 100% efficiency
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Tom
• Re: 100% efficiency
  • From: Tom
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: 100% efficiency
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: What's the matter with antimatter?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: supercat
• Re: Euler
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Science Heretics "Expelled."
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: supercat
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: supercat
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 100% efficiency
  • From: Tom
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: PD
• Re: 100% efficiency
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 100% efficiency
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• 100% efficiency
  • From: Tom
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: supercat
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: supercat
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: supercat
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: supercat
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: PD
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: Greg Neill
• Dumb question: Please help if you can......
  • From: supercat
• Re: Spin is an Arbitrary concept
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Supposing our universe is the inside of a black hole...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• When attacked ( by “ Nasty Jews ” or whatever ), I see 3 main choices.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Tom
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Mel Gibson: “ Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world ”.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Euler
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Tom
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Tom Potter, were you slandered by the Jews ?
  • From: Kunt100
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The delusions of the idle.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Tom Potter, were you slandered by the Jews ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Fraud? I think so.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Edward Green
• THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: ACE
• Re: Supposing our universe is the inside of a black hole...
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Kon
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Kunt100
• Euler
  • From: Rahula
• What's the matter with antimatter?
  • From: Cutix
• Fraud? I think so.
  • From: Tom
• Be a Good Guest.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Does Gravitational Force Differ?
  • From: Kumar
• The delusions of the idle.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Gravity And The One Big Curve
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Supposing our universe is the inside of a black hole...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The Green Zone in Bagdad was not a gift.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Does Gravitational Force Differ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Mother of all geniuses
  • From: Cutix
• Cooper-pair condensates follow Bose-Einstein statistics.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Mother of all geniuses
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: War is about governments and landlords evicting unwanted guests.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Tom Potter, were you slandered by the Jews ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Tom Potter, were you slandered by the Jews ?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Kunt100
• Re: Tom Potter, were you slandered by the Jews ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: War is about governments and landlords evicting unwanted guests.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: NoEinstein
• I control who's posts I see first..
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: none
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Mother of all geniuses
  • From: Cutix
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Taxes are good, especially fuel taxes.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Re: Magnetic field outside cylindrical coil inductor
  • From: Eric Gisse
• War is about governments and landlords evicting unwanted guests.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf =?UTF-8?Q?
• Does Newton's third law hold in Special Relativity?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 240.1: Does a Unit Velocity Vector Cause Acceleration of Universe and Collapse of Wave Function?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 241.8: PD and PIn When A = B
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: F . Art . Ingatu
• Re: Quantum Gravity 240.1: Does a Unit Velocity Vector Cause Acceleration of Universe and Collapse of Wave Function?
  • From: Mary
• Magnetic field outside cylindrical coil inductor
  • From: michaeld84
• Re: quaternionic kicks
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Quantum Gravity 241.7: Interpretations of P-Derivatives/Differentials in Physics
  • From: OsherD
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Kon
• Re: Science Heretics "Expelled."
  • From: Androcles
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: none
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Kunt100
• Re: Mother of all geniuses
  • From: Igor
• Re: quaternionic kicks
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Igor
• Re: Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: F . Art . Ingatu
• Quantum Gravity 241.6: P-Derivatives or P-Differentials: PD vs PI
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 241.5: Proofs of Equations (Continued)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 241.4: Proofs of 240-241 Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Judiasm - a topic suited to a group about Physics?
  • From: Kunt100
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: Androcles
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Androcles
• 1955 Dodge Red Ram 270 Hemi V-8 engine w/bellhousing FOR SALE
  • From: Dwight D. Eisenhower
• Re: Tom Potter, were you slandered by the Jews ?
  • From: Kunt100
• Large Hose - Small Car
  • From: Borked Pseudo Mailed
• Re: Entropy. / My opinion /.
  • From: Benj
• quaternionic kicks
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Entropy. / My opinion /.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Entropy. / My opinion /.
  • From: socratus
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: into space at low spped
  • From: Steve Dorman
• Quantum Gravity 240.3: Did Newton Discover "Set/Event Calculus"?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• manual solution solution manual study guide
  • From: sms123
• Quantum Gravity 240.2: Is Discrimination/Integration (Knowing differences and similarities between stimuli or ideas) Equivalent to "Attention" in the Universe?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: F . Art . Ingatu
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: hanson
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: tadchem
• Revenue and Technology of Clandestine Organizations
  • From:
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: Edward Green
• Quantum Gravity 240.1: Does a Unit Velocity Vector Cause Acceleration of Universe and Collapse of Wave Function?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Mother of all geniuses
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Fact?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Mother of all geniuses
  • From: tadchem
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: into space at low spped
  • From: Androcles
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 4 Apr 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: into space at low spped
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics of color vision
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: into space at low spped
  • From: CWatters
• Mother of all geniuses
  • From: Cutix
• Re: Physics of color vision
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: into space at low spped
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: into space at low spped
  • From: sss
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: jimp
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: jimp
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: jimp
• Re: Physics of color vision
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Igor
• Re: Physics of color vision
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: into space at low spped
  • From: Andrew
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: hanson
• Physics of color vision
  • From: drjoaom
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: uri
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: uri
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: Edward Green
• R. W. Wood's "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse"
  • From: Gene Ledbetter
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 241.0: Causal Probability of Subluminal-Superluminal Velocity Reversal
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Tom Potter spewing his noxious screed once again (was Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: into space at low spped
  • From: PD
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Perhaps Tom Potter had a stress-induced adrenaline rush ( shock ).
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Tom Potter, were you slandered by the Jews ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: uri
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: uri
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: uri
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: into space at low spped
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• into space at low spped
  • From: fruitbat
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Quantum Gravity 240.9: Replacing v^2 with v^2 - c^2 or c^2 - v^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: hanson
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Wire Rope Isolator -> Low pass filter??
  • From: Nick
• Re: Do cosmic rays cause climate change?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do cosmic rays cause climate change?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do cosmic rays cause climate change?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sci.physics as a costume ball.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished and no bad deed goes unrewarded.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: hanson
• Re: spacetime and fluids
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Sci.physics as a costume ball.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci.physics as a costume ball.
  • From: PD
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Darwin123
• Do cosmic rays cause climate change?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Androcles
• Perhaps Tom Potter had a stress-induced adrenaline rush ( shock ).
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Physicists discover the 'superinsulator'
  • From: tadchem
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Fact?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: tadchem
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: tadchem
• Tom Potter, were you slandered by the Jews ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Sci.physics as a costume ball.
  • From: PD
• Re: Turning copper wire into C70 Fullerene-like quantum object
  • From: Cutix
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: hanson
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: hanson
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: hanson
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: jason_armitage12345
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: jason_armitage12345
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: srp2inc
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Kon
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: Coater
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Try Googling: “‘ Jew ’ is my word for anyone I don't like. ”.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Legge di Faraday, You're sbagliato
  • From: 1-天
• Legge di Faraday, You're sbagliato
  • From: 1-天
• La Ley de Faraday, Estás equivocada
  • From: 1-天
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: PD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: PD
• Faraday's Law, U bent verkeerd
  • From: 1-天
• Faraday's Law, U bent verkeerd
  • From: 1-天
• Faraday's Law, Vous avez tort
  • From: 1-天
• Faraday's Law, Vous avez tort
  • From: 1-天
• Faraday's Law, You're wrong
  • From: 1-天
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: john
• Re: What happens to a rock hitting a Neutron Star?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: PD
• Gradual School: a comic strip about aspiring scientists
  • From: Lee
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Is Tom Potter fighting some people he thinks might be Jews ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: freeze guns
  • From: jimp
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Turning copper wire into C70 Fullerene-like quantum object
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished and no bad deed goes unrewarded.
  • From: theman
• freeze guns
  • From: uri
• Re: Black Hole Eats Earth
  • From: RichD
• Quick & Secured Pharmacy Online. 2y2ay
  • From: shenshenbaltaz
• Re: QUANTUM ZOMBIES
  • From: Igor
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: jason_armitage12345
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: Igor
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: No one anywhere has ever observed something moving faster than c.
  • From: none
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: DESTRUCTION OF HUMAN RATIONALITY IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: relativistic problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Animating the M-M apparatus in a circular orbit like the GPS birds.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: PD
• Re: spacetime and fluids
  • From: Huang
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Tom Potter: how to do web-links as sig/post script?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Tom Potter
• Please come and join us
  • From: The Cool Man
• Re: Understanding Bekenstein-Hawking radiation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativistic problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Understanding Bekenstein-Hawking radiation
  • From: Ceriel Nosforit
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Tom Potter: how to do web-links as sig/post script?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: spacetime and fluids
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Quantum Gravity 240.8: How "Causal" Is General Relativity?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity 240.8: How "Causal" Is General Relativity?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: You're a silly f_cker 'NoEinstein'.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: hanson
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished and no bad deed goes unrewarded.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: You're a cold hearted f_cker Hanson.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Quantum Gravity 240.8: How "Causal" Is General Relativity?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: No one anywhere has ever observed something moving faster than c.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: No one anywhere has ever observed something moving faster than c.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: relativistic problem
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Michael Helland
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 April 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Scientific Evidence for a god: Fine-Tuning
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Wire Rope Isolator -> Low pass filter??
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newtons Laws
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Fact?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Fact?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: spacetime and fluids
  • From: Huang
• Turning copper wire into C70 Fullerene-like quantum object
  • From: Cutix
• Tom Potter: how to do web-links as sig/post script?
  • From: hanson
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Adam
• Re: QUANTUM ZOMBIES
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wierd Clock Pendulum Period
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wierd Clock Pendulum Period
  • From: Bill Bowden
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• QUANTUM ZOMBIES
  • From: Cutix
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Darwin123
• Physicists discover the 'superinsulator'
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: help with physics ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: srp2inc
• help with physics ?
  • From: jason_armitage12345
• Re: Supposing our universe is the inside of a black hole...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: hanson
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: hanson
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: PD
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: hanson
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Supposing our universe is the inside of a black hole...
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Maxwell Equation, point charges: "exact" numeric solution
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Supposing our universe is the inside of a black hole...
  • From: PD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished and no bad deed goes unrewarded.
  • From: theman
• Re: THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Dwib
• Re: BrainStimPro Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: theman
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Vacuum and Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• Supposing our universe is the inside of a black hole...
  • From: Alfred_Dube
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: PD
• Re: After unmanned space exploration, now an unmanned NASA?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: ACE
• [OT] Upcoming Book: "Gnuplot in Action"
  • From: gnuplot
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: hanson
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: You're a cold hearted f_cker Hanson.
  • From: hanson
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: spacetime and fluids
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: spacetime and fluids
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: spacetime and fluids
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Planetary Sling shotting...???
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Planetary Sling shotting...???
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Planetary Sling shotting...???
  • From: PD
• Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Kon
• Re: What happens to a rock hitting a Neutron Star?
  • From: PD
• Re: spacetime and fluids
  • From: Huang
• After unmanned space exploration, now an unmanned NASA?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Reason why perpetual motion cannot generate energy.
  • From: guskz
• What happens to a rock hitting a Neutron Star?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spin is an Arbitrary concept
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: PD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Mike
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Mike
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: GENTLEMEN ARE YOU TIRED ABOUT PAYING HUGE AMOUNT FOR GASES AND FUEL IN ORDER TO RUN YOUR CAR.WE FOUND THE REMEDY HERE.I USE THIS REMEDIAL THING FOR LAST SIX MONTHS.STILL MY CAR IS RUN WITH THE REMEDIAL THING.I DONT CARE ABOUT FUEL RATE INCREASING.THE L
  • From: Anon
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Tom Potter
• GENTLEMEN ARE YOU TIRED ABOUT PAYING HUGE AMOUNT FOR GASES AND FUEL IN ORDER TO RUN YOUR CAR.WE FOUND THE REMEDY HERE.I USE THIS REMEDIAL THING FOR LAST SIX MONTHS.STILL MY CAR IS RUN WITH THE REMEDIAL THING.I DONT CARE ABOUT FUEL RATE INCREASING.THE LINK IS BELOW
  • From: vicky
• The landlords Tom Potter is battling.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: entanglement
  • From: Thomas Heger
• No one anywhere has ever observed something moving faster than c.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• spacetime and fluids
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• No good deed goes unpunished and no bad deed goes unrewarded.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Mike
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Planetary Sling shotting...???
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Black Duck Outfitters!!! RIP OFF
  • From: rq5znszb
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Planetary Sling shotting...???
  • From: Benj
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Maxwell Equation, point charges: "exact" numeric solution
  • From: Benj
• Re: Maxwell Equation, point charges: "exact" numeric solution
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: A H-Weapon Designs Available
  • From: Schmedly
• Re: Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Google sold out to the Jewish Lobby
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: You're a cold hearted f_cker Hanson.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 240.7: Chaplygin Gas Relationship To Real-Complex Velocity Change
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Maxwell Equation, point charges: "exact" numeric solution
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Planetary Sling shotting...???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Planetary Sling shotting...???
  • From: The Translucent Amoebae
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Stone in Superposition
  • From: Cutix
• fanning yourself - can it be effective?
  • From: RichD
• Re: water & insect repellant surfaces.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Stone in Superposition
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Cooldown curves, heat transfer, convective cooling etc.?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: BrainStimPro Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: BrainStimPro Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A H-Weapon Designs Available
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: Maxwell Equation, point charges: "exact" numeric solution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Understanding Bekenstein-Hawking radiation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: Physics News of the Week
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Drop a ball and the surface of the Earth moves up to meet it?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physics News of the Week
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Maxwell Equation, point charges: "exact" numeric solution
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics News of the Week
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: entanglement
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physics News of the Week
  • From: PD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: PD
• Understanding Bekenstein-Hawking radiation
  • From: Ceriel Nosforit
• You're a cold hearted f_cker Hanson.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: A H-Weapon Designs Available
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• A H-Weapon Designs Available
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: hanson
• Androcles check ACE inhibitors
  • From: hanson
• Re: A Basic Enhancer
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Maxwell Equation, point charges: "exact" numeric solution
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Vacuum and Light quanta.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physics News of the Week
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: PD
• A Basic Enhancer
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Physics News of the Week
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Androcles
• Physics News of the Week
  • From: PD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Are algae the ultimate renewable energy source?
  • From: Armadillo_Tamer
• Re: Real today approach for building a working time machine
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Core Needle Implanters for Yield Enhancment
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Maxwell Equation, point charges: "exact" numeric solution
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Vacuum and Light quanta.
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: PD
• Re: Big Dog
  • From: Edward Green
• Extension to Koide Formula
  • From: bearnol
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Mike
• Re: In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: jimp
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Mike
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: PD
• Re: Cooldown curves, heat transfer, convective cooling etc.?
  • From: Adam
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Mike
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Got banned forever
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: PD
• Re: Stone in Superposition
  • From: Cutix
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: PD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Quantum Gravity 240.6: "Counter-Gravity" From Imaginary Velocity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Kon
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: PD
• I should sue Hanson and Androcles for libel.. or kick their asses.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Real today approach for building a working time machine
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Got banned forever
  • From: Greg Neill
• Real today approach for building a working time machine
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Got banned forever
  • From: uri
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Androcles
• Real today approach for building a working time machine.
  • From: reactor1967
• Vacuum and Light quanta.
  • From: socratus
• In physics forum they ban forever
  • From: uri
• Real today approach for building a working time machine.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Y.Porat
• water & insect repellant surfaces.
  • From: problems
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Mike
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Mike
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Florian
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Florian
• Quantum Gravity 240.5: Quantum Gravity "Demolished" At University of Oregon USA
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fountain of Energy!!!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Fountain of Energy!!!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Fountain of Energy!!!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: center mass question
  • From: jimp
• center mass question
  • From: Austinp via NatScience.com
• center mass question
  • From: Austinp via NatScience.com
• Re: Quantum Gravity 240.4: A Gravitational No-Progress Report From Italy and Canada
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Stone in Superposition
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Huang
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity 240.4: A Gravitational No-Progress Report From Italy and Canada
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Where Angels Fear to Fall
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Huang
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: #15 supporting evidence by how ideas are sometimes formed ; new book: "How the Mind Works; Brain as a Radio-Receiver/TV theory"
  • From: Gentle Bunny
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physics of Al Gore
  • From: Cutix
• Re: Stone in Superposition
  • From: Cutix
• Stone in Superposition
  • From: Cutix
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Huang
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: entanglement
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: entanglement
  • From: PD
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: entanglement
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What's better than Einstein's ideas ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: PD
• Re: Large Hadron Collider in cosmic catastrophe lawsuit!
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Maxwell Equation, point charges: "exact" numeric solution
  • From: niels.gierse@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: About something on biophysics
  • From: tadchem