Re: Tom Potter, were you slandered by the Jews ?


<Kunt100@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eeede655-2229-4df4-b474-6c2a1456f1e1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 4 apr, 15:19, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jeff?Relf" <X...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:Jeff_Relf_2008_Apr_3__4_34_Pe@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> Were you slandered by the Jews ?
> Did they take your free-speach rights ? â?o power and money â? ?

It would be pretty hard to "slander" me using facts,
and I welcome attempts to "slander" me or anyone
with lies, half truths, distortions, and boilerplate,
as it allows me to identify and expose dishonest people.

Considering that I am retired, have no businesses,
am not in politics, and have a good self image,
it would be pretty hard to take away my free speech,

but as a person who believes that free speech is a positive force,
I frequently take a stand when I see
an effort to inhibit the free speech of anyone.

The bottom line is,
I don't like to see people like Jimmy Carter, Mel Gibson,

--In what way has Mel Gibson been slandered and by whom?

I am pleased to see that Kunt100@xxxxxxxxx
agrees with me that Jimmy Carter was a victim of
Institutionalized Jewish Bigotry.

As can be clearly seen,
the following "Book Review" of Jimmy Carter's book,
"PALESTINE PEACE NOT APARTHEID"
was not a rational book review,
but was a bigoted hatchet job,

and it demonstrates how Jews use institutionalized bigotry
to silence critics and intimidate politicians.

As can be seen by examining the history of the New York Times,
they were instrumental in instigating and profiting from
the Spanish-American War and the Class Wars of the 1900's,
America's 1960's Urban Rebellion,
and they are instrumental in instigating
the Religious Wars of the 2000's.

The New York Times, like the Washington Post,
and Time Magazine use the "Bait and switch" scam
to con the unsuspecting public,

They provide good information in many areas
in order to win credibility
so they can con the public into believing
that Jews are "Virtuous Victims",
and the folks who criticize Jews are bigots.

It does not take a system engineer to comprehend
that Jewish controlled media, like the New York Times,
are the REAL BIGOTS
and that they use Institutionalized Bigotry
to promote their greedy, dishonest, destructive agenda.

The definition of "bigot" is:
"A prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions
differing from his own."

New York Times hatchet job follows:
=========================
"This is a strange little book about the Arab-Israeli conflict from a major
public figure. It is premised on the notion that Americans too often get
only one side of the story, one uncritically sympathetic to Israel, so
someone with authority and knowledge needs to offer a fuller picture. Fine
idea. The problem is that in this book Jimmy Carter does not do so. Instead,
he simply offers a narrative that is largely unsympathetic to Israel.
Israeli bad faith fills the pages. Hollow statements by Israel's enemies are
presented without comment. Broader regional developments go largely
unexamined. In other words, whether or not Carter is right that most
Americans have a distorted view of the conflict, his contribution is to
offer a distortion of his own.

Yasir Arafat is portrayed as someone who disavowed terrorism. Hafez
al-Assad, who was president of Syria until 2000 when he died and his son
took over, is quoted for an entire section, offering harsh impressions of
Israel, including the opinion that it "initiated the 1967 war in order to
take even more Arab land." Carter does not contradict him. The separation
barrier that Israel is building along and inside parts of the West Bank is
not to stop suicide bombers and other violent attacks. Its "driving
purpose," Carter says, is "the acquisition of land."

Such misrepresentations - and there are others - are a shame because most of
what Carter focuses on is well worth reading about. The barrier (which he
calls a "wall" even though a very small percentage is wall) does indeed take
land from the Palestinians. His chapter on the endless humiliation of daily
life for the Palestinians under Israeli occupation paints a devastating and
largely accurate picture of confiscated farm produce, unfair competition
from Israeli goods, withheld foreign donations, leveled houses and legal
dead ends. Carter is right that insufficient attention is being paid, but
perhaps that is because his picture feels like yesterday's story, especially
since Israel's departures from southern Lebanon and Gaza have not stopped
anti-Israel violence from those areas.

This book has something of a Rip van Winkle feel to it, as if little had
changed since Carter diagnosed the problem in the 1970s. All would be well
today, he suggests, if his advice then had been followed. Forget Al Qaeda
(the name does not appear in this book), the nuclear ambitions of Iran and
the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan. If Israel had "refrained from
colonizing the West Bank," he asserts, there would have been "a
comprehensive and lasting peace." The debate about the Israeli occupation
"will shape the future of Israel; it may also determine the prospects for
peace in the Middle East - and perhaps the world."

This is an awfully narrow perspective. The Middle East could well be the
source of the next major war and the chances of avoiding it would be
increased if the Israeli question were settled. Moreover, if Israel had not
built settlements throughout Gaza and the West Bank, solving its dispute
with the Palestinians would probably have been - and would be - a lot
easier.

But there are other factors to consider, including that for the most radical
leaders of the Muslim world - and their numbers are not dwindling - settling
the Israel question does not mean an equitable division of land between
Israel and Palestine. It means eliminating Israel.

To see the narrowness of Carter's perspective, it is worth returning to
1979, the year of the Egypt-Israel peace treaty that resulted from Carter's
Camp David mediation as president, a hugely significant accomplishment.
Carter rightly accuses Menachem Begin, then Israel's prime minister, of
deception regarding the expansion of West Bank settlements. Begin promised
to freeze the settlements. Not only did he not do so; he had no intention of
doing so. Carter lost re-election in 1980 to Ronald Reagan and suggests that
Reagan's nod-and-wink tolerance of Israeli actions - its bombing of Iraq's
nuclear reactor, annexation of the Golan Heights, settlement building and
1982 invasion of Lebanon - were the beginning of the end of the process he
had set in motion.

Yet the trouble that was brewing even before these events suggests they may
not have been the central issue Carter sees them as. Egypt was instantly
ostracized from the Arab world because of its agreement with Israel.
Moreover, 1979 was the year of the Iranian revolution, the Soviet invasion
of Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein's consolidation of power in Iraq. As much
as Israeli policies fueled Arab rage - and they certainly did - these other
forces contributed heavily to the state of affairs today.

This does not mean that the problems on the ground have no impact. Israel's
friends will increasingly tell you that the dispute is not about land or
occupation at all but about the growing radicalism of the Muslim world and
its refusal to countenance a Jewish state in its midst. The confiscation of
land, the roadblocks and border closings, the preference given to Israeli
products within the occupied areas over locally made ones do not amount to
much, they say. And those who focus on them are engaging not only in
anti-Israel propaganda but in a kind of anti-Semitism.

Which is what some are hinting unfairly of Carter. The Anti-Defamation
League has run large advertisements in major newspapers, including this one,
attacking the book for Carter's propagation of "myths like Jewish control of
the government and media." Across the land, Jewish leaders and their friends
are asking each other what exactly Carter's problem is with the Jews.

Their biggest complaint against the book - a legitimate one - is the word
"apartheid" in the title, with its false echo of the racist policies of the
old South Africa. But overstatement hardly adds up to anti-Semitism.

There is, however, another subtler issue and it has to do with Carter's
religious focus. There is a weird scene toward the start of the book in
which Carter, a born-again Christian, goes to see Prime Minister Golda Meir
on his first visit to Israel in 1973. She asks his impressions. "I said that
I had long taught lessons from the Hebrew Scriptures and that a common
historical pattern was that Israel was punished whenever the leaders turned
away from devout worship of God. I asked if she was concerned about the
secular nature of her Labor government."

Meir, a secular chain smoker, could only shrug. Carter seems impressed with
his own temerity, as he calls it. But the episode hints at his tone deafness
about Israel and Jews. Today, those most opposed to Israel's withdrawal from
the West Bank are not the secular Labor Party leaders that Carter worried
about. They are the leaders of the religious Zionist parties who consider
the West Bank not a Palestinian area where Jews once lived, but their
God-given birthright that must not be yielded. Carter never tells us how he
squares his notions of God's punishment of secular Jews with the policies of
such devout politicians."
====================

End of bigoted hatchet job on Jimmy Carter

Of course, the major reason that Jews work to discredit Jimmy Carter,
is that he was responsible for the demise of the Soviet Union,
which was controlled by Jews up until about 1985.

As can be seen by reading history,
after Jews massacred the Russian Royal Family,
and co-opted the Russian government,
they used Russia as a base from where to
instigate the Class Wars of the 1900's,

and Jews in America and all over the world,
sided with Russia in the Class Wars.
They spied, they hyped and financed civil wars
in Spain, China, South America, etc.
not to mention America's Urban Rebellion of the 1960's.

After Jimmy Carter exposed Russia as "An Evil Empire",
got America and most of the world
to boycott the 1980 Olympics in Moscow,

Russia got Ted Turner of CNN fame
to televise Russia's "Freedom Games"
in order to salvage some of the investment they had made.
but Turner wisely demanded that they allow Russians access to CNN TV.

After the Russians got a chance to see the outside world,
the Jewish control over the Native Russians began to unravel.

When the Russian Jews saw that their power was fading,
and the Native Russians were regaining control of their government,
and that their world domination scheme was failing,

the Russian Jews began a phony "Free Jews" program,
and hundreds of thousands of Jews migrated to Israel and America
at the expense of the American taxpayer,

and they are using these places as their new base
from where to instigate the Religious Wars of the 2000's.

It is interesting to see that after the Jews looted Germany,
they made Germany and the German people villains,

and after they looted Russia
they made Russia and the Russian people villains,

and no doubt after they finish looting America,
they will try to make Americans and America villains.

Of course, they have been playing the same game for over 2000 years.
As can be seen by the Jews own holy book,
when they were driven out of Egypt,
they stole everything they could carry.

Regarding Kunt100@xxxxxxxxx question about Mel Gibson,
it does not take a system engineer to comprehend that:
1. He was targeted by a Jewish Cop.
2. The Jewish cop violated his sworn duty and was reprimanded.
3. The Jewish media, Jews in the movie industry,
and Jews on the Internet immediately began to
slander Mel Gibson, an honest, hard-working, family man,
who loves his country, just like they did Jimmy Carter.

It is also interesting to observe that the Jews also did a
hatchet job on Mel Gibson's father and family.

--
Tom Potter

http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html
http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com
http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tom Potter, were you slandered by the Jews ?
    ... I don't like to see people like Jimmy Carter, Mel Gibson, ... that Jews are "Virtuous Victims", ... he simply offers a narrative that is largely unsympathetic to Israel. ... sided with Russia in the Class Wars. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: cos dla frederacjio zydowskiej
    ... Adolf Hitler and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ... Carter, our 39th President, to this violent world. ... Israel, Carter has joined that long list of vicious anti-Jewish ... million Jews in the European gas ovens, a feat Carter hopes to repeat. ...
    (soc.culture.polish)
  • Thank You, Jimmy Carter by Rabbi Michael Lerner
    ... Jimmy Carter was the best friend the Jews ever had as president of the ... between Israel and Egypt, but never a return to war, once Israel fully ... Carter had to twist the arms of Menachem Begin ... Palestinian world, by the Israeli government in the Jewish world-this ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: off topic
    ... Jimmy Carter was the best friend the Jews ever had as president of the ... between Israel and Egypt, but never a return to war, once Israel fully ... Carter had to twist the arms of Menachem Begin ... Palestinian world, by the Israeli government in the Jewish world-this ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: Archaeologists misinterpret the MESHA STELE
    ... of a single murder while there is belief by people even such ... Instead you have only stories, hearsay at best, to support your fantastic beliefs where even Israel has SHITCANNED the extermination story. ... those Jews who were transported before allie troops set foot in Germany. ... There are still three million in Russia. ...
    (soc.history.ancient)