100% efficiency

100% efficiency is theoretically possible. If one could achieve this
it would simply mean the best conversion from one form of energy to another.
I bring this to the discussion to address the latest resurgence of the
"Overunity" cultist. "Youtube" and websites are cluttered with
gadgets that people are certain produce more then 100% of the input power.
They assume so based on a what a fluke voltmeter says.
If only these people knew how stupid they are. They might take a gun to
their head. I suspect that's why they remain delusional and swear they
really have something.

Let's assume that someone did discover an unknown in physics. 101% or even
100.0001 % would mean that you have left over energy. If that were the case
then you would have a self destructive machine unless the extra energy was
used up, no?

This is why a closed loop system that claims more then a 100% is pure bull
***. The closest thing might be a nuclear reaction. If the reaction is not
carefully controlled and contained we know what happens, however nuclear is
not overunity despite the ill informed who claim it is.
Or is it? It's deceiving because the rods don't move and only take initial
power to place them together for the reaction to start. Feel free to
discuss.

Bottom line is this. If anyone somehow violates the laws they will know it.
There is a good chance they will get killed when they discover it. ;o)
Something tells me though that we won't get to see the video of this
happening. I do believe John Bendini's device is close to 100% when built
correctly. That's why people get all hyped up and think it's putting out
more power then it takes to run it.


.