Re: Fraud? I think so.
- From: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:41:38 -0700
Tom wrote:
I'm amazed at all the foolish people who tried to build one of these
with no re-producable results. I saved my self the trouble.
This device can not do what it does in this video without
help from someplace. The sheeple don't care. It must be real becuase
it works in the video. I will suck this guy's penis in front of a camera
if he can proove it works with any outside force. I'm not Gay either. ;o)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7fh2RP_uEs
Bet a felching.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fraud? I think so.
- From: Tom
- Re: Fraud? I think so.
- References:
- Fraud? I think so.
- From: Tom
- Fraud? I think so.
- Prev by Date: Re: Rigorous definition of Planck's Constant
- Next by Date: Re: 100% efficiency
- Previous by thread: Re: Fraud? I think so.
- Next by thread: Re: Fraud? I think so.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
