Re: Explanation of why expansion redshift optical illusion of a different kind of redshift

On Apr 22, 12:41 am, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Apr 22, 1:44 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>

But maybe it just doesn't work that way over 2000 million light years.

and maybe if cows had wings they could fly? oh wait they don't, and
their bone structure is completely wrong... oh well, its fun to
speculate....


You think the prospect of SR having limits is as absurd as cows
flying.

I thought scientists weren't supposed to "believe" their theories.


<snip>

I just demonstrated, rather undeniably, that the evidence for
expansion corresponds directly to light that decelerates over the
megaparsecs.

no you demonstrated nothing, since you have yet to show me some
experimental evidence in support of your idea...


Then apparently you can't read, because all experimental evidence for
expansion also supports my idea.


Yes light slows down for example the speed of light is
different in a vacuum... but that speed is the one that SR shows is
constant in all frames of reference. Something you have yet to show
any evidence to the contrary for.

The evidence is well known, just interpreted wrong as expansion rather
than deceleration, which I've shown are functionally identical.

Or perhaps physicist have left the tiered light idea behind due to
better theories coming along....

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/tiredlit.htm

hmmm... so now i have cited a paper that refutes your idea, try citing
some papers in support of your idea.


That's not a paper. It's a web page. It makes points about light
curves that this paper refutes:

http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0404/0404207.pdf
<quote>
Supernovae Ia (SNe Ia) light curves have been used to prove the
universe is expanding. As standard candles, SNe Ia appear to indicate
the rate of expansion has increased in the past and is now decreasing.
This independent evaluation of SNe Ia light curves demonstrates a
Malmquist Type II bias exists in the body of supernova data. If this
bias is properly addressed, there is very little budget for time
dilation in the light curves of supernova.
<snip>
For most of the 20th century astronomical observations such as
galactic evolution, heavy metal abundance, supernovae light curves and
the cosmic microwave background have fallen within the constraints of
the Einstein - de Sitter Big Bang model. In the last two decades these
relationships have become severely strained. The universe is too big
and too old; the magnitudes of supernovae are dimming too fast. There
are too many radio point sources. The far infrared continuum emissions
imply a dusty past that is completely at odds with multi-colored
supernovae and quasar spectrums. There is too little anisotropy in the
cosmic microwave background to support the observed galaxy
super-cluster structure. Heavy metal ratios equal to solar
concentrations have been quantified in the most redshifted objects we
observe. Something is wrong with this mature theory: It has failed in
too many predictions.
</quote>
.

Quantcast