Work Proceeds- Experimental Status
- From: Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondouglas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
I predict that a system where slow light was caused appear will
exhibit an inertial anomaly.
It is possible that nobody does high power level measurments of the
state of slow light. Except for the Emdrive, http:\\www.emdrive.com.
I would like to predict fancifally based on the tenous reality of this
effect.
A computer where a slow light connects a single atom dot system may
allow micro lasers as atom emitters. But that is to tenous of a
concept already covered by IBM someplace in their labs.
Slow inertia drive can be caused by highpower lasers and magnetrons.
A basic power as slow quanta appears the cause to the anomaly. So a
1kW laser can equal a 1kW magnetron. But magnetrons are easy to make
and fairly cheap.
It is had to beat magnetrons.
So given the need for lightwieght magnetrons I am researching plastic
transformer design. PLastic as conductors.
A fairly resistive plastic appears easy to make, but can it be used
for a magnetron? A graphite loaded plastic should either be
acceptable or not.
So induction as a question becomes an issue in theory. Can plastic
inductors rival metal ones?
And I believe a critical aspect was magnetic suseptability. Making
graphite a bad choice. Ferro-center suseptability in graphite is
lousey.
So lightwieght transformers are technically impossible. A Z relation
appears. High Z allows ferro-centers appears a rule.
And so I decided to follow a basic design method of ducted microwave.
A single magnetron to power a rotating set of waveguides.
And low and behold. A slight gap of a mm will have no effect,
allowing high speed rotation waveguides. All that was nescessary was
a perfect coupler.
And one is in the design stage. An invention in itself is a waveguide
of 2 GHz in perfect rotation harmony.
I have three months of work delay currently. SO real rotated cavity
drive experiments will not start until August 2008.
Design of the launcher vertical rotator appear all done. It will be a
one foot diameter pvc tube 2 feet long. A set of six outside bearings
will suspend the tube vertically in a plywood box. A fan motor
vertically mounted will drive the tube. I will use a low budget drive
vee-belt. Slippage will be allowed on startup. I will just vee-belt
the pvc tube like a dryer machine. A vertical tumbler tube!
I have the pvc tube and a motor and a pulley to size the drive. All I
really need is a vee belt from Graingers down the street and six
bearings, three inchers. Total cost for the tumbler is about two
hundred dollars.
A small battery will require some research. I need a two pound 12V
high current battery. Does any body have any recommendations? This is
a critical design limitation.
Shawyer seem to indicate a warmup period as being required. This
confused me until I discovered by Conjecture a need to cause a slow
light in the waveguide. SO I will need a car battery as auxilary
power to warmup the waveguide. It will be a loosly connected jack
that pops off when the tumblers starts to rotate. It will be in
parrallel with the small onboard battery.
I have a nice signal counter that should measure the chamber frequency
nicely. I will not use it because it would require an EE to properly
connect an internal antenna to the counter by a coax cable? Maybe I
will just use a monopole antenna inside connected to a coax cable. And
make it two centimeters high. How does that sound.
note; MY last big experiment was my double propeller design. It
works as a speed dependent assistor. If designed for a top speed
usage only a certain matching of the size to the speed will allow a
slight efficiency gain over the single propellor. A downside is that
at speed lower than top speed the benefit is so slight it is a waste
of time and money. But for a machine to do straight and level world
record busting a design is highly done. It is not disclosable at this
time. It will give a ten percent speed gain!!!
Note_ A poorly designed passive double propellor would only take away
performance, by drag. So my data is in and it advises a certain
design to get a air speed set gain, top speed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Work Proceeds- Experimental Status
- From: nuny@xxxxxxx
- Re: Work Proceeds- Experimental Status
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is Al Gore wrong about rising sea water?
- Next by Date: Re: GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
- Previous by thread: How many Neutrons out of the BB have yet Decayed?
- Next by thread: Re: Work Proceeds- Experimental Status
- Index(es):