Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
- From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:13:57 +0100
This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4pvfe5-93u.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Pedant Point: While viscosity of frozen water is very high, I'm not
| sure it's infinite; glaciers flow. Then again, an alternate
| explanation is that pressure lowers the melting point, so that the
| glacial layers slide on a thin boundary layer of liquid water.
Hahahaha!
How convenient that the boundary layer is just where it is needed
regardless of the amount of mass above.
Definitely one for Mythbusters.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
- From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
- References:
- Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
- From: Joris Dolderer
- Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
- From: Joris Dolderer
- Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
- From: Sanny
- Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
- Prev by Date: INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON OPTICAL SUPERCOMPUTING (OSC'08): Deadline extension
- Next by Date: Re: The Earth Is Growing
- Previous by thread: Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
- Next by thread: Re: Water near freezing point: Why not huge viscosity?
- Index(es):