sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: How do we slow down the speed of SOUND
  • From: hanson
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Whjat is the minimum Temperature Possible?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How do we slow down the speed of SOUND
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 May 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Spaceman
• Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Whjat is the minimum Temperature Possible?
  • From: tadchem
• .
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Robert11
• Re: emr and matter are linked orthogonal rotations of energy in 1:1 and 1:2 ratios respectively
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why does the topic of God appear on a physics board?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• perhaps the acceleration we see is just rotation
  • From: john
• Re: Broken Russian Loo on the Space Station
  • From: Agent Smith
• A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Job opening in physics
  • From: jimp
• emr and matter are linked orthogonal rotations of energy in 1:1 and 1:2 ratios respectively
  • From: john
• Re: Whjat is the minimum Temperature Possible?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Whjat is the minimum Temperature Possible?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Whjat is the minimum Temperature Possible?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Job opening in physics
  • From: jmfbah
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: D-theory - Geometry solves the interpretation of guantum physics
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: Kro
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Phoenix microscopy shows Haversian canals as clear as textbook photos
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: D-theory - Geometry solves the interpretation of guantum physics
  • From: Greg Neill
• Rely on Cheap Mechanical Design, Mechanical Engineering and 3d Modeling Services at Lowest Rates
  • From: 3dmechanical
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Why does the topic of God appear on a physics board?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 May 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: D-theory - Geometry solves the interpretation of guantum physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: D-theory - Geometry solves the interpretation of guantum physics
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: D-theory - Geometry solves the interpretation of guantum physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: D-theory - Geometry solves the interpretation of guantum physics
  • From: Androcles
• D-theory - Geometry solves the interpretation of guantum physics
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 May 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• No anatomists can deny these six Haversian canals at Phoenix's foot
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Job opening in physics
  • From: Sanny
• Re: NEW QUANTUM-MECHANICAL EQUATION!
  • From: Fee Spee Stee
• Re: NEW QUANTUM-MECHANICAL EQUATION!
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: NEW QUANTUM-MECHANICAL EQUATION!
  • From: Fee Spee Stee
• NEW QUANTUM-MECHANICAL EQUATION!
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Broken Russian Loo on the Space Station
  • From: hanson
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Physics World: Latest Issue
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Has a 'Physicists gone wild' link been posted here
  • From: hanson
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Job opening in physics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 30 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: student manual solution instructor solution manual study guide
  • From: sanaaheiba
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Job opening in physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Has a 'Physicists gone wild' link been posted here
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: angular moment. conserv. in quantum mech.
  • From: Graven Water
• angular moment. conserv. in quantum mech.
  • From: Graven Water
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: angular moment. conserv. in quantum mech.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Real Martian Found
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Experimental UPdate- Eagleson Drive an emdrive nOT
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Space push
  • From: Coater
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: PD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Turbulence in a tube
  • From: Ejo
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: PD
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Job opening in physics
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: WHY "inertia theorem"????
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Examples of electric attraction?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Has a 'Physicists gone wild' link been posted here
  • From: hanson
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Has a 'Physicists gone wild' link been posted here
  • From: Spaceman
• Job opening in physics
  • From: sprott
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Lothar Brendel
• Re: Size of the sun?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Has a 'Physicists gone wild' link been posted here
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE = INTELLIGENT DESIGN
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Wood's metal and styrofoam
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Examples of electric attraction?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Size of the sun?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Real Martian Found
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: who
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• angular moment. conserv. in quantum mech.
  • From: Graven Water
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Quantum Gravity 259.8: Singapore Nonlinear Quantum Cosmology Leads to Isolating Difficulty With Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: Lee
• WHY "inertia theorem"????
  • From: Yao Ming
• Hannes Alfven Birth Centennial
  • From: a_guest
• Free Falling Problem - Dimensionless Analysis
  • From: Arjin
• Re: The Heisenberg picture vs. the Schrodinger picture
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Has a 'Physicists gone wild' link been posted here
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• OT: Slouching Towards Kalamazoo
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Two vectors, two coordinate systems
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Two vectors, two coordinate systems
  • From: animalover1
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: What is God?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Real Fleshy Martian Skull and Face
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: Real Fleshy Martian Skull and Face
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: look out!free energy is comming!!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: simple theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: simple theory
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Kro
• Re: NIghtscope versus Daylight Scope
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• NIghtscope versus Daylight Scope
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Nuclear Power's Role in Generating Electricity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: The Heisenberg picture vs. the Schrodinger picture
  • From: wnadler@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Real Fleshy Martian Skull and Face
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Sitting still in gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• look out!free energy is comming!!!
  • From: idofice
• simple theory
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.7: Reminder About Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 259.7: Reminder About Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.5: Netherlands Finds Universe May Be Interior of Black Hole and Thermodynamics Goes Down Drain
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Wood's metal and styrofoam
  • From: Huang
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Wood's metal and styrofoam
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light quanta and its life.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Wood's metal and styrofoam
  • From: Matt Giwer
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: CWatters
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Ratio of Mass-density to Radiation-density in Cosmology.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: bz
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Ratio of Mass-density to Radiation-density in Cosmology.
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: PD
• The Heisenberg picture vs. the Schrodinger picture
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: PD, try this
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PD, try this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: PD
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: PD
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Butt Hunter Apocalypse: The Case for Global Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Current Generation of Dumbasses Is Dumbest Generation Ever?
  • From: joe
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Current Generation of Dumbasses Is Dumbest Generation Ever?
  • From: Benj
• Time has never been measured physically
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Current Generation of Dumbasses Is Dumbest Generation Ever?
  • From: Damn I'm Dumb
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.5: Netherlands Finds Universe May Be Interior of Black Hole and Thermodynamics Goes Down Drain
  • From: western
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Infinite density energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Matt Menge
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: john
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.6: More Regarding Nieuwenhuizen's Paper (Netherlands)
  • From: gernic
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Kro
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: PD
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Quantum Gravity 259.6: More Regarding Nieuwenhuizen's Paper (Netherlands)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 259.5: Netherlands Finds Universe May Be Interior of Black Hole and Thermodynamics Goes Down Drain
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light quanta and its life.
  • From: jimp
• Quantum Gravity 255.2: Multiverse Interpretation of Supersymmetry-Superstring
  • From: OsherD
• Light quanta and its life.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Cheapest way to create a .06 ATM vacuum in 2 cu ft container?
  • From: bz
• Re: By the way... Franz Heymann
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cheapest way to create a .06 ATM vacuum in 2 cu ft container?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: anomalous magnetic dipole moment vs CPT
  • From: katastrofa_nadfioletu
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Robert Hubbard
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Igor
• Re: anomalous magnetic dipole moment vs CPT
  • From: katastrofa_nadfioletu
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: srp2inc
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Myers-Randi-Dawkins Corp.
  • From: david mabus
• Re: Cheapest way to create a .06 ATM vacuum in 2 cu ft container?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Megin
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 261.2: Argentina: "Time" Via Inflation May have Created Dark Energy
  • From: Dudly
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: tadchem
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: timo
• Cheapest way to create a .06 ATM vacuum in 2 cu ft container?
  • From: Ker_01
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: bz
• Re: Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Matt Menge
• Re: Quantum Gravity 261.2: Argentina: "Time" Via Inflation May have Created Dark Energy
  • From: gernic
• Re: anomalous magnetic dipole moment vs CPT
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: bz
• Re: Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Matt Menge
• 2D pseudo-Voigt for x-ray diffraction data
  • From: Allan
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: patpowersspam
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: bz
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Kro
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: PD
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: Greg Neill
• anomalous magnetic dipole moment vs CPT
  • From: katastrofa_nadfioletu
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: john
• Re: New tests of the Copernican Principle proposed
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: bz
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New tests of the Copernican Principle proposed
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: mL
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: mL
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: mL
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: Sanny
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: Ray Vickson
• As time goes by, gravity becomes less spooky and more ponderable.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp......
  • From: davidmabus2010
• Re: 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: Sanny
• Quantum Gravity 261.2: Argentina: "Time" Via Inflation May have Created Dark Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: john
• 1kg masses at 1km
  • From: Lee
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: timo
• Re: Quantum Gravity 261.1: Causation is Composed of Not Only Time But Proximity (not Distance) Between Cause and Effect
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 261.1: Causation is Composed of Not Only Time But Proximity (not Distance) Between Cause and Effect
  • From: OsherD
• New of the Universe: Supernova initial flash
  • From: Sam Wormley
• New tests of the Copernican Principle proposed
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: For food lovers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: George Smith
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The Electromagnetic principle of Relativity.
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: bz
• The Electromagnetic principle of Relativity.
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: Spaceman
• Impact Parameter
  • From: giovanni
• Re: Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Matt Menge
• Null Physics, worth it?
  • From: Matt Menge
• Re: Quantum Gravity 260.3: Quantum Operators As Complex "Translations" of Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Causes and Effects are Less Fundamental Than the Latter
  • From: OsherD
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Intensify ceram. magnets
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Whyy peaks are sharper in Raman than in infrared spectroscopy ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity 261.0: Zaragoza U. Spain Comes Up with Finite Interval H Explanation of Cosmic Acceleration
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Inward push of gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 261.0: Zaragoza U. Spain Comes Up with Finite Interval H Explanation of Cosmic Acceleration
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Intensify ceram. magnets
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: (rev 4.5) Defining God correctly - and Heaven, and Hell - What ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Matrix as Set Transposition
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Matrix as Set Transposition
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Matrix as Set Transposition
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Vor
• Re: Swiss clocks and Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: For food lovers
  • From: Androcles
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: Androcles
• For food lovers
  • From: Jean
• Matrix as Set Transposition
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 260.0: The Real Interpretation of F = Gm1m2/r^2
  • From: eratosthenes
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 260.3: Quantum Operators As Complex "Translations" of Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Causes and Effects are Less Fundamental Than the Latter
  • From: eratosthenes
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sanny
• Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: Edward Green
• Intensify ceram. magnets
  • From: Luke Stafford
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 26, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Swiss clocks and Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Children's Magazine and Science Comic Series
  • From: Sanny
• Quantum Gravity 260.3: Quantum Operators As Complex "Translations" of Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Causes and Effects are Less Fundamental Than the Latter
  • From: OsherD
• Whyy peaks are sharper in Raman than in infrared spectroscopy ?
  • From: Alfred
• Quantum Gravity 260.2: E = hv or nhv of QM Translated into Probable Causation/Influence (PI) yields -T of PI ~ Quantum Operator -ihDt of E
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Benj
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Quantum Gravity 260.0: The Real Interpretation of F = Gm1m2/r^2
  • From: Dudly
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: PD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Hydrogen Acts as Storage for Energy?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Hydrogen Acts as Storage for Energy?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Swiss clocks and Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Swiss clocks and Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  • From: Uncle Al
• Swiss clocks and Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  • From: Spaceman
• GetSolution Team
  • From: paysolution
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hydrogen Acts as Storage for Energy?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Mechanics of Materials [solutions manual] hibbeler 7th edition GetSolution Team
  • From: paysolution
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Score another for LeSage's Theory of Gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 260.1: The "distortion" When Mass Differs Much From Distance in Normalized F = Gm1m2/r^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 260.0: The Real Interpretation of F = Gm1m2/r^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Score another for LeSage's Theory of Gravity
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hydrogen Acts as Storage for Energy?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: Edward Green
• Calculating if object will break
  • From: Jakob Nielsen
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: john
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Hydrogen Acts as Storage for Energy?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• It is time, yet again. I am back.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: john
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Many people landed on Mars
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• This was clearly a Martian nerve cell
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Limit As v Approaches c is Indeterminate Unless m0(v) is Defined
  • From: srp2inc
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Kro
• Inovabrasil - 23_05_08 Indice PARCIAL (19 de 62 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Universes
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Hey Potter -- Here's the GPS application you wanted
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: panteltje
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: George Smith
• Re: question about force
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Quantum Gravity 259.4: Same With xy --> x + y - 1
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 259.3: D_PI (f(x)), PI "semi-analog" of q-derivative in q-Calculus
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: RichD
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Quantum Gravity 259.2: 0, +/- 1, 2, 3 From Fundamental Set in Network Architectures for Nanoelectronics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: question about force
  • From: dggriffinjr
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Quantum Gravity 259.1: Related Paper to Tsiganov's on Solitons
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.0: Miscellaneous New Results Relating To PI: Fundamental Sets, Exponentials, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 259.0: Miscellaneous New Results Relating To PI: Fundamental Sets, Exponentials, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Localized surfaces plasmons
  • From: Peter Graf
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: mL
• Quantum Gravity 254.99: Stationary, Maxima, Minima Principles Relating to Cause Magnitude = Effect Magnitude
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 254.98: Physical/Psychological Intuitions Regarding Maximum Causation When Magnitudes of Cause and Effect Are Equal
  • From: OsherD
• Re: calculating electric potential if known in some places
  • From: timo
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: mL
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: robertbrichter
• Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Successful Cold Fusion Experiment in Japan?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: calculating electric potential if known in some places
  • From: partialdiff
• Cold Fusion new Hoax?
  • From: Sanny
• Re: question about force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: question about force
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Successful Cold Fusion Experiment in Japan?
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: Successful Cold Fusion Experiment in Japan?
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Successful Cold Fusion Experiment in Japan?
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: HUGE MARTIAN NEURONS AS BIG AS DINOSAUR'S
  • From: Sanny
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Quantum Gravity 254.98: Physical/Psychological Intuitions Regarding Maximum Causation When Magnitudes of Cause and Effect Are Equal
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: question about force
  • From: PD
• question about force
  • From: dggriffinjr
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: CERN REPORT ON SAFETY OF LHC - CRITICAL APPROACH
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 254.98: Physical/Psychological Intuitions Regarding Maximum Causation When Magnitudes of Cause and Effect Are Equal
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: mL
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: mL
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Kro
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: CERN REPORT ON SAFETY OF LHC - CRITICAL APPROACH
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: mL
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Quantum Gravity 354.97: How nP(A-->B) is obtained for Un (the nth Universe)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 354.96: The Case b > 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Quantum Gravity 254.95: More Regarding the Derivation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Anon Email
• Quantum Gravity 254.94 Functional Equation Derivation of Multiverse Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Igor
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bloch wall electromagnet
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Mark
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: George Smith
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: tadchem
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 23 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Bloch wall electromagnet
  • From: David King
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: timo
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: robertbrichter
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: robertbrichter
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: robertbrichter
• Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Conservation of Angular momentum question
  • From: robertbrichter
• Quantum Gravity 254.93: Influence Line Relating Yahya Ould Hamidoune to Quantum Theoristss
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 256.1: Italy, Argentina, Greece Generalize Randall-Sundrum With Fundamental Set and Stringy Cosmology
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: Limit As v Approaches c is Indeterminate Unless m0(v) is Defined
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: newtons law of motion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: John Park
• Re: Presentation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: john
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Limit As v Approaches c is Indeterminate Unless m0(v) is Defined
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Uncle Al
• newtons law of motion
  • From: brendanmenezes
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: calculating electric potential if known in some places
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Quantum Gravity 254.92: Another Direction Toward n: Critical Pair Theory in Groups/Sets/Posets
  • From: gernic
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Kro
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: john
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: Bradster
• Re: Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: Bradster
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Tom Potter
• FREE Tutorials on HTML XHTML CSS JavaScript XML XSL ASP SQL ADO VBScript, SAP - ABAP
  • From: Dhanabal
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Presentation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Quantum Gravity 256.1: Italy, Argentina, Greece Generalize Randall-Sundrum With Fundamental Set and Stringy Cosmology
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 254.92: Another Direction Toward n: Critical Pair Theory in Groups/Sets/Posets
  • From: OsherD
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: junoexpress
• Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity 256.1: Italy, Argentina, Greece Generalize Randall-Sundrum With Fundamental Set and Stringy Cosmology
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Limit As v Approaches c is Indeterminate Unless m0(v) is Defined
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: Patrick Meuser-Bianca
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Energy Destroyed
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Energy Destroyed
  • From: Anon Email
• Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: timo
• Re: Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Robert Hubbard
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: timo
• Re: Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: Robert Hubbard
• Re: FFiMP: The Equivalence Principle
  • From: Igor
• Re: Foundational Flaws in Modern Physics
  • From: Igor
• Informal Poll about an Authorship Problem
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: timo
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 256.1: Italy, Argentina, Greece Generalize Randall-Sundrum With Fundamental Set and Stringy Cosmology
  • From: gernic
• Re: none of these 4 posts appears in Google
  • From: PD
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Limit As v Approaches c is Indeterminate Unless m0(v) is Defined
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: "Foundational Flaws in Physics" - Conclusions
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Foreword to "Foundational Flaws in Modern Physics"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: FFiMP: Misconceptions about Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: FFiMP: Misconceptions about Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Help me concoct a large quantity of non-newtonian fluid for my physics class?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Blending function
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: Darwin123
• Limit As v Approaches c is Indeterminate Unless m0(v) is Defined
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Electron conduction in copper in simple series battery circuit
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Schrodinger's cat:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: Robert Hubbard
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: broli
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: FFiMP: The Equivalence Principle
  • From: Uncle Al
• Foundational Flaws in Modern Physics
  • From: Jan Gooral
• Foreword to "Foundational Flaws in Modern Physics"
  • From: Jan Gooral
• FFiMP: The Equivalence Principle
  • From: Jan Gooral
• FFiMP: Is our Universe four-dimensional?
  • From: Jan Gooral
• FFiMP: Spacetime Curvature and Gravitation
  • From: Jan Gooral
• "Foundational Flaws in Physics" - Conclusions
  • From: Jan Gooral
• Re: Universes
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Is a magnetic field "attached to" it's source?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Kro
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• de broglie wave velocity
  • From: richardskaa
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: broli
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: broli
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: broli
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: calculating electric potential if known in some places
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Quantum Gravity 256.1: Italy, Argentina, Greece Generalize Randall-Sundrum With Fundamental Set and Stringy Cosmology
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Blending function
  • From: leo
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: socratus
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Quantum Gravity 254.91: nP(A-->B) From The Schrodinger Equation, or QM is Causal
  • From: OsherD
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 21 May 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Man-Made Warming Altering Nature's Clock
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Man-Made Warming Altering Nature's Clock
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: calculating electric potential if known in some places
  • From: timo
• calculating electric potential if known in some places
  • From: partialdiff
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: timo
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Lasers and Huygens' prinziple
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: pippaferguson
• Centripetal Force & g forces
  • From: Bradster
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Lasers and Huygens' prinziple
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Effect Before Cause
  • From: Pulpiteer Jack Sluttmuffin, Kuarter Kobold
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Lasers and Huygens' prinziple
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is static friction different from dynamic friction?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: Surface Barrier Potential
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Man-Made Warming Altering Nature's Clock
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: Robert Hubbard
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 254.9: The Expression P ' ((A-->B) U (B-->A)) is Remarkable
  • From: OsherD
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 254.8: P ' (A-->B) + P ' (B-->A) = 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Man-Made Warming Altering Nature's Clock
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: Androcles
• Surface Barrier Potential
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Blending function
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Man-Made Warming Altering Nature's Clock
  • From: jimp
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: broli
• Re: Electron conduction in copper in simple series battery circuit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Blending function
  • From: Androcles
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Kro
• Re: physics is simple
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electron conduction in copper in simple series battery circuit
  • From: Morgoth1988
• electric field along an electromagnetic ray
  • From: broli
• Re: Schrodinger's cat:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: PD
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My Copyright- @2008
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: My Copyright- @2008
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: PD
• Re: My Copyright- @2008
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Blending function
  • From: leo
• Re: Man-Made Warming Altering Nature's Clock
  • From: Tom
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: PD
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: PD
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Man-Made Warming Altering Nature's Clock
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The simplest problem in GR
  • From: PD
• The simplest problem in GR
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Man-Made Warming Altering Nature's Clock
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Re: Vacuum & etc.
  • From: socratus
• physics is simple
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: My Copyright- @2008
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Quantum Gravity 254.6: Fundamental Set and Langlands
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 254.7: How Multiverse Went From P(A-->B) to 2P(A-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Beware, The Agents of Despair...
  • From: Automutt
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Man-Made Warming Altering Nature's Clock
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Man-Made Warming Altering Nature's Clock
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Astronomers in a Spin About Mystery Pulsar
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: question about strain resolution
  • From: Tom Potter
• Willis Lamb: 1913-2008 May 20, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• New High Redshift CMB Measurement
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: socratus
• Re: Vacuum & etc.
  • From: socratus
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: What is this?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: My Copyright- @2008
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: What is this?
  • From: Tony
• Professor Sam Wormley might've misunderstood Einstein.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: john
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: Igor
• Suction of smokes
  • From: jostria
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Quick question regarding photon near massive body
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Quick question regarding photon near massive body
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My Copyright- @2008
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: john
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: drag
  • From: Androcles
• Dragons of Islam, remember your origin....
  • From: Automutt
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Quick question regarding photon near massive body
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: drag
  • From: CWatters
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: drag
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• drag
  • From: teflbook
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quick question regarding photon near massive body
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Help me concoct a large quantity of non-newtonian fluid for my physics class?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Vacuum & etc.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: help needed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: My Copyright- @2008
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: About every day life of the elementary particles (simplified)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Vacuum & etc.
  • From: Androcles
• Help me concoct a large quantity of non-newtonian fluid for my physics class?
  • From: autopseudomondo
• Vacuum & etc.
  • From: socratus
• help needed
  • From: kumar . saurav0310
• What is Colder inside a BH or Outside?:
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why sound needs a medium to travel and light not?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Interpreting Feynman's Mystery
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Kro
• My Copyright- @2008
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Chemical Reactions: Gibbs Free Energy Changes (∆G)
  • From: richardskaa
• Re: Quick question regarding photon near massive body
  • From: Sam Wormley
• question about strain resolution
  • From: pippaferguson
• Re: Quick question regarding photon near massive body
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quick question regarding photon near massive body
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: MASS-CHARGE-ENERGY
  • From: Y.Porat
• About every day life of the elementary particles (simplified)
  • From: adib . jebara
• Re: MASS-CHARGE-ENERGY
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: Quantum Gravity 254.6: Fundamental Set and Langlands
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 254.6: Fundamental Set and Langlands
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 254.5: Advanced Algebra As a Phase Theory and the Multiverse
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Electron conduction in copper in simple series battery circuit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: isnt the earth going faster than light. so relativity is wrong,einstien is wrong?!
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Random movement.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Random movement.
  • From: john
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Igor
• Re: Electron conduction in copper in simple series battery circuit
  • From: Morgoth1988
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Electron conduction in copper in simple series battery circuit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Electron conduction in copper in simple series battery circuit
  • From: Morgoth1988
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Electron conduction in copper in simple series battery circuit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: STOP dreaming about your next job: GO to the OU Job Board NOW and get
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: the shrink that treats me like a full promised to me triple permanent release of medication (declaring the end of my insanity) signed with three hands if only i dedanoe win what so ever NOBEL PRIZE by the end of the year..
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: George Smith
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Electron conduction in copper in simple series battery circuit
  • From: Morgoth1988
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: isnt the earth going faster than light. so relativity is wrong,einstien is wrong?!
  • From: CWatters
• Physics Today Favorites - May 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: isnt the earth going faster than light. so relativity is
  • From: zergling13
• Re: isnt the earth going faster than light. so relativity is wrong,einstien is wrong?!
  • From: zergling13
• Re: Need help writimg differential equation for simple mixing tank
  • From: brobigi
• Re: isnt the earth going faster than light. so relativity is
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Random movement.
  • From: Uncle Al
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Kro
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Elcy
• STOP dreaming about your next job: GO to the OU Job Board NOW and get
  • From: jobs@xxxxxx
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp.
  • From: david mabus
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp.
  • From: david mabus
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Axel Kline
• A Force of General Relativity
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The mutual tidal radius of Sol~Sirius = ?
  • From: Androcles
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 19, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• About Renormalisation and physical prediction
  • From: Barrow
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Random movement.
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: isnt the earth going faster than light. so relativity is wrong,einstien is wrong?!
  • From: katbo
• Quantum Gravity 258.0: SEP (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) and Australia on Counterfactual Causation Theories
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: isnt the earth going faster than light. so relativity is wrong,einstien is wrong?!
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• isnt the earth going faster than light. so relativity is wrong,einstien is wrong?!
  • From: zergling13
• Re: Random movement.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The mutual tidal radius of Sol~Sirius = ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp......
  • From: davidmabus2013
• Re: NASA BRINGING CALAMITY TO MANKIND
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Axel Kline
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: Jim Black
• Random movement.
  • From: john
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Constant Speed of Light
  • From: Axel Kline
• Quantum Gravity 257.4: If 1 Represents Infinity, then 1/2 Has a Remarkable Interpretation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Denial of Advanced Technology.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: George Smith
• Re: Is speed relative?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is speed relative?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Applied cryptography text books
  • From: tutorialwebs
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: OG
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: jimp
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: DarkMatter
• Re: a theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: jimp
• Quantum Gravity 257.3: G has the Dimensions of "a" and "r^2" and M2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: jjsajd
• Quantum Gravity 257.2: /G/, 2/G/, 3/G/,...,n/G/, ... in Multiverse
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How many photons?
  • From: Y.Porat
• How many photons?
  • From: DarkMatter
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is spacetime
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Please help!!
  • From: Engineer
• Is speed relative?
  • From: DarkMatter
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the shrink that treats me like a full promised to me triple permanent release of medication (declaring the end of my insanity) signed with three hands if only i dedanoe win what so ever NOBEL PRIZE by the end of the year..
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a theory
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum Gravity 257.1: Relationship of P(r^2 + a --> m2) = -G to Varying G (Newton's Gravitational Constant)
  • From: Thomas Heger
• a theory
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: radar cross section using ray tracing
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The mutual tidal radius of Sol~Sirius = ?
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 257.1: Relationship of P(r^2 + a --> m2) = -G to Varying G (Newton's Gravitational Constant)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: NASA BRINGING CALAMITY TO MANKIND
  • From: Cork Soaker
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: radar cross section using ray tracing
  • From: broli
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Brownsgas [1960]
  • From: john
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Brownsgas [1960]
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• The Mythology of 20th Century Science
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Finsrud's perpetual motion device [1996]
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Sexy women and Wildest couples
  • From: lucienhed
• Sexy women and Wildest couples
  • From: lucienhed
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Run your car on water!!! I've done it.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Xogen - clean water purficaction, free energy generator and home heating devices [2001]
  • From: CWatters
• Run your car on water!!! I've done it.
  • From: freewater4gas
• Re: David Hudson ORMUS elements [1970]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does P(r^2 + a --> m^2) = 2 - G (Newton's gravitational constant)?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Range of the strong force?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Finsrud's perpetual motion device [1996]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Does P(r^2 + a --> m^2) = 2 - G (Newton's gravitational constant)?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Brownsgas [1960]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• ayaz
  • From: soc.fan
• Re: Propagation modeling of moist air and suspended water/ice particles at frequencies below 1000 GHz
  • From: soc.fan
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Light always travels at c, energy is always conserved, and Jesu...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Elcy
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: need help understanding diffraction in geometrical theory of diffraction.
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Range of the strong force?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• This one's for Sefton...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Range of the strong force?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Range of the strong force?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Magnets, guitar strings, and "sustain"
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 256.0: Lisa Randall's Popular Book "Warped Passages" 2005, CCC (HarperCollins): N.Y. and Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Magnets, guitar strings, and "sustain"
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 255.1: The Multi-Instanton 8k - 3 (Fundamental Set) Expression From U.K., Turkey, Italy, Netherlands
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Xogen - clean water purficaction, free energy generator and home heating devices [2001]
  • From: Uncle Al
• Xogen - clean water purficaction, free energy generator and home heating devices [2001]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light always travels at c, energy is always conserved, and Jesus always loves you
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Magnets, guitar strings, and "sustain"
  • From: OG
• Re: Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Brownsgas [1960]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: hubert . ruypers
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 16 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: hanson
• Re: Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: Androcles
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 16 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Aunty Al Stoopid
• Re: Light always travels at c, energy is always conserved, and Jesus always loves you
  • From: Aunty Al Stoopid
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: radar cross section using ray tracing
  • From: broli
• Re: Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: tadchem
• radar cross section using ray tracing
  • From: broli
• Re: Brownsgas [1960]
  • From: CWatters
• Re: need help understanding diffraction in geometrical theory of diffraction.
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: hubert . ruypers
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: measure
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Magnets, guitar strings, and "sustain"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Light always travels at c, energy is always conserved, and Jesus always loves you
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rotational Mechanics
  • From: CWatters
• Will Mike runaway?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Light always travels at c, energy is always conserved, and Jesus always loves you
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Elcy
• Re: need help understanding diffraction in geometrical theory of diffraction.
  • From: Androcles
• measure
  • From: gp19823238
• Re: Magnets, guitar strings, and "sustain"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: War-for-Profit Gang plan to stop Obama
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Are Global Warmists Pulling a Cool Fast One?
  • From: John M.
• Re: Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: need help understanding diffraction in geometrical theory of diffraction.
  • From: broli
• need help understanding diffraction in geometrical theory of diffraction.
  • From: broli
• Another GREAT idea from Tom Potter!!!!!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Magnets, guitar strings, and "sustain"
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Magnets, guitar strings, and "sustain"
  • From: hcbowman
• Re: Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: Ian Parker
• Rotational Mechanics 2
  • From: hubert . ruypers
• A Letter Of Einstein 1954
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp.
  • From: david mabus
• Re: Light always travels at c, energy is always conserved, and Jesus always loves you
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Light always travels at c, energy is always conserved, and Jesus always loves you
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 254.4: Multiverse Memory From MIT
  • From: OsherD
• physicsworld.com newswire (Week 20)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 254.3: The Multiverse Increasing Causal Probability Levels Go in Opposite Direction to Quantum Energy Levels
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Finsrud's perpetual motion device [1996]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Energy Destroyed
  • From: Aunty Al Stoopid
• Re: Quiz question
  • From: Aunty Al Stoopid
• Re: Quiz question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quiz question
  • From: Uncle Al
• David Hudson ORMUS elements [1970]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: may 25 discovery channel disproves einstiens ideas of realativity and e=mc^2,
  • From: Igor
• Brownsgas [1960]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Too Late. The Population Explosion is Already Over (was: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth ...)
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Too Late. The Population Explosion is Already Over (was: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth ...)
  • From: Sock
• Re: Bruce DePalma N-machine [1990]
  • From: Sock
• Re: MASS-CHARGE-ENERGY
  • From: Sock
• Re: WAR- I WILL NOT BE NOT SPEAKING
  • From: Sock
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Quiz question
  • From: Sock
• Re: Bruce DePalma N-machine [1990]
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Too Late. The Population Explosion is Already Over (was: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth ...)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quiz question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Bruce DePalma N-machine [1990]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Too Late. The Population Explosion is Already Over (was: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth ...)
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Calculation of Earth's precession
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Rotational Mechanics
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Quiz question
  • From: Sanny
• Quiz question
  • From: Joe
• Re: Rotational Mechanics
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Calculation of Earth's precession
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: WAR- I WILL NOT BE NOT SPEAKING
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: MASS-CHARGE-ENERGY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Energy Destroyed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rotational Mechanics
  • From: hubert . ruypers
• Re: Rotational Mechanics
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: MASS-CHARGE-ENERGY
  • From: Sock
• Re: Rotational Mechanics
  • From: Sock
• Re: WAR- I WILL NOT BE NOT SPEAKING
  • From: Sock
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Sock
• Re: Energy Destroyed
  • From: Sock
• Re: WAR- I WILL NOT BE NOT SPEAKING
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: WAR- I WILL NOT BE NOT SPEAKING
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rotational Mechanics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: MASS-CHARGE-ENERGY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Energy Destroyed
  • From: Uncle Al
• WAR- I WILL NOT BE NOT SPEAKING
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: John Cramer's Retrocausality - Status?
  • From: CSharpner
• Re: Ferromagnetic exchange coupling for dummies
  • From: Edward Green
• Rotational Mechanics
  • From: hubert . ruypers
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Elcy
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Electricity is repulsion in current
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Energy Destroyed
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: PD
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Mike
• MASS-CHARGE-ENERGY
  • From: Divij Rao
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Quantum Gravity 255.0: 1/2 vs (3 - sqrt(5))/2 in Dominating Cliques in Random Graphs
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Quantum Gravity 254.2: Is The Speed of Light c "Quantized" in the Multiverse?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 254.1: Our Universe As "Zero-Point-Energy (ZPE)-Probability" of Multiverse Generalized Probable Causations nP(A-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Energy Destroyed
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: zergling13
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: may 25 discovery channel disproves einstiens ideas of realativity and e=mc^2,
  • From: john
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Finsrud's perpetual motion device [1996]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: PD
• Re: may 25 discovery channel disproves einstiens ideas of realativity and e=mc^2,
  • From: Igor
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: zergling13
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: pulling ropes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Ferromagnetic exchange coupling for dummies
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Mike
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Things aren't always what they seem.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: PD
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Sock
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Sock
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Sock
• Re: Where is the electric current in a permanent magnet?
  • From: z
• Case 08-0631- MY FBI CASE
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Mike
• may 25 discovery channel disproves einstiens ideas of realativity and e=mc^2,
  • From: zergling13
• may 25 discovery channel disproves einstiens ideas of realativity and e=mc^2,
  • From: zergling13
• Re: Things aren't always what they seem.
  • From: zergling13
• Re: pulling ropes
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: zergling13
• Re: Where is the electric current in a permanent magnet?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: PD
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Mike
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Things aren't always what they seem.
  • From: Quint Essential
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Ferromagnetic exchange coupling for dummies
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: Riccati and its applications
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Elcy
• Re: Riccati and its applications
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: tadchem
• Things aren't always what they seem.
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: DarkMatter
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Another Riccati from a different class polynomial
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp......
  • From: davidmabus2006
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity 252.4: More Regarding Riccati and Ermakov
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 252.4: More Regarding Riccati and Ermakov
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 252.3: Germany Opens the Riccati-Ermakov-HUP-Feinman-Wigner Debate
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: zergling13
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: PD
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Usenet
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Usenet
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: none
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• nikola tesla made wireless energy powerplants faster than light energy transfer!!!
  • From: zergling13
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: john
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tachyons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: What is spacetime
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Quantum Gravity 252.2: Tan(x), Arctan(x), Differences in Black Holes By (Retired) Argonne National Lab Researcher
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Quantum Gravity 254.0: Portugal Multiverse-Dark Energy-Gravity-Randall-Sundrum and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Tachyons
  • From: DarkMatter
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: What is spacetime
  • From: Usenet
• Re: Quantized conductance seen in graphene
  • From: Usenet
• Re: Why Theory is Importent.
  • From: Usenet
• Re: pulling ropes
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: pulling ropes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: pulling ropes
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Igor
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why Theory is Importent.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantized conductance seen in graphene
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: What is spacetime
  • From: Uncle Al
• pulling ropes
  • From: EvilGoatz
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Inovabrasil - 10_05_08 Indice Parcial (15 de 61 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio B
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Galois271
• Riccati and its applications
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Where is the electric current in a permanent magnet?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Why Theory is Importent.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: tigerhawk62
• "Gravity"
  • From: Elcy
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Weight vs. Mass (Again)
  • From: Galois271
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Mike
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Quantized conductance seen in graphene
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What is spacetime
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: How Nostradamus ANNIHILATED the entire atheist movement
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?
  • From: Aunty Al
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Finsrud's perpetual motion device [1996]
  • From: Tom
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: They created a monster like Einstein in physics
  • From: none
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: SWS, Slow Wave Structures, as a New Class of Relativity Drive
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• How Nostradamus ANNIHILATED the entire atheist movement
  • From: davidmabus2006
• Re: Finsrud's perpetual motion device [1996]
  • From: Aunty Al
• Re: Diamond's. A Jewel Wearers Acquaintance
  • From: Aunty Al
• Re: What is The Shawyer/Emdrive?
  • From: Aunty Al
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: energy in waves
  • From: shahars10
• Re: energy in waves
  • From: PD
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?
  • From: Androcles
• Happy 9th Anniversary Princess Little Honey !!!!!!!
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• They created a monster like Einstein in physics
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?
  • From: Cork Soaker
• Re: Finsrud's perpetual motion device [1996]
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: energy in waves
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Radical Depopulation Of The Earth - The Solution To Mankind's Problems?
  • From: ShatteredParadigmProductions
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 253.0: Brazil Violates Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: energy in waves
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: What is The Shawyer/Emdrive?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Diamond?s? A Jewel Wearers Acquaintance
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Finsrud's perpetual motion device [1996]
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Potential and Temperature always act the same.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Potential and Temperature always act the same.
  • From: lugoteehalt
• Re: Where is the electric current in a permanent magnet?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: BrainDumb
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: BrainDumb
• Re: Where is the electric current in a permanent magnet?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: Where is the electric current in a permanent magnet?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Tricky hamiltonian/poisson bracket question
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: none
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Elcy
• What is The Shawyer/Emdrive?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: SWS, Slow Wave Structures, as a New Class of Relativity Drive
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• S(g--cm^2-sec) = t^3 * energy, is Wrong Because..
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Tricky hamiltonian/poisson bracket question
  • From: nick flint
• Re: Ethanol increases air pollution in addition to raising food prices!
  • From: Willie . Mookie
• Re: Ethanol increases air pollution in addition to raising food prices!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi- Dawkins- Myers Corp. ......
  • From: davidmabus
• Re: Ethanol increases air pollution in addition to raising food prices!
  • From: Willie . Mookie
• Re: Ethanol increases air pollution in addition to raising food prices!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: energy in waves
  • From: Eric Gisse
• energy in waves
  • From: shahars10
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 12, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Diamond’s… A Jewel Wearers Acquaintance
  • From: nation2233
• Re: Finsrud's perpetual motion device [1996]
  • From: Artfishlintlgenz
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: Basti05b
• Circulating time differences of World's Oceans
  • From: gerhard nowak
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Finsrud's perpetual motion device [1996]
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Ethanol increases air pollution in addition to raising food prices!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: none
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ethanol increases air pollution in addition to raising food prices!
  • From: Willie . Mookie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ethanol increases air pollution in addition to raising food prices!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: El Enrrabadore-mor
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: none
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: none
• Re: Where is the electric current in a permanent magnet?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: SWS, Slow Wave Structures, as a New Class of Relativity Drive
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The Four Cs You Need To Know When Purchasing Your Diamond
  • From: aztnat
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity 252.1: Fundamental Set In MIT CFT Gravity Duals and N = 4 SYM
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Where is the electric current in a permanent magnet?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: GatherNoMoss
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: gubbenimanen
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: BrainDumb
• Re: Where is the electric current in a permanent magnet?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: gubbenimanen
• Re: illustration about the em-field
  • From: Androcles
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: gubbenimanen
• Re: Where is the electric current in a permanent magnet?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Ethanol increases air pollution in addition to raising food prices!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Emdrive Attempt-Status
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 09 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Emdrive Attempt-Status
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 09 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: hanson
• Re: HEY DARWIN123, I'M TALKING TO YOU! was Re: Gravity inside a spherical shell in non-Euclidean space
  • From: George Smith
• Re: Slow Light Doppler Drag is it Real?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Sni
• Relativity Drive as a Slow Wave Force Device- Fails!
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: illustration about the em-field
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 09 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Your report card is in. B-
  • From: hanson
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 09 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity 252.0: Higgs Gravity, Black Holes, and Lasers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Challenger Solid Rocket Booster Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Robert Hubbard
• Re: The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: vps137
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Slow Light Doppler Drag is it Real?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Slow Light Doppler Drag is it Real?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• The Mind of God
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: BrainDumb
• Slow Light Doppler Drag is it Real?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: ACE
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: Basti05b
• High-Voltage Metallurgy
  • From: ayaz
• Growth chemistry for the fabrication of designer diamonds for high pressure research
  • From: ayaz
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Your report card is in. B-
  • From: Google Is Spam
• Re: BEST VIDEO sex!
  • From: Google Is Spam
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Google Is Spam
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Google Is Spam
• Re: Where does the Bernoulli effect come from?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: tadchem
• Re: SWS, Slow Wave Structures, as a New Class of Relativity Drive
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: SWS, Slow Wave Structures, as a New Class of Relativity Drive
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Anti-Scientology group "anonymous" are a bunch of idiots. I am Joining Scientology Today.
  • From: Huang
• Best Video!!! SEX!!help!
  • From: dupalek
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: PD
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: Androcles
• How to measure effect of cell phone tower.
  • From: BrainDumb
• 666 (Re: How lasers really workHow lasers really work)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: john
• Re: Anti-Scientology group "anonymous" are a bunch of idiots. I am Joining Scientology Today.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: spock
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: jimp
• SWS, Slow Wave Structures, as a New Class of Relativity Drive
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: DarkMatter
• My JET Engine Invention
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Anti-Scientology group "anonymous" are a bunch of idiots. I am Joining Scientology Today.
  • From: Huang
• Anti-Scientology group "anonymous" are a bunch of idiots. I am Joining Scientology Today.
  • From: Huang
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Sni
• Re: BEST VIDEO sex!
  • From: jmfbah
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 09 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: OG
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: Basti05b
• Quantum Gravity 251.9: The Higgs Field As The Space(time) Drill Causal Part of a Black Hole
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 09 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: hanson
• Re: BEST VIDEO sex!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 09 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: BEST VIDEO sex!
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: PD
• Protect yourself against Operation Sudden Fall
  • From: Tamara . Cauchon
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 09 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: hanson
• Re: BEST VIDEO sex!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 09 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Your report card is in. B-
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Uncle Al
• BEST VIDEO sex!
  • From: dupalek
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 09 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Your report card is in. B-
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Your report card is in. B-
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: illustration about the em-field
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Would Earth's Horizon Appear Much Higher If Earth Was an Infinite Plane?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Would Earth's Horizon Appear Much Higher If Earth Was an Infinite Plane?
  • From: giveitawhril2008
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 251.8: Could the Singularity of the Black Hole "Drill" Be Probably Correlated to Matter?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: john
• Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
  • From: cjcountess
• Special Track “Computational Bioimaging and Visualization” within the ISVC08 USA - Announce & Call for Papers
  • From: tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Reflection of a Ghost
  • From: hanson
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Challenger Solid Rocket Booster Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Challenger Solid Rocket Booster Question
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Challenger Solid Rocket Booster Question
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Challenger Solid Rocket Booster Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reflection of a Ghost
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Challenger Solid Rocket Booster Question
  • From: Robert11
• Re: illustration about the em-field
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reflection of a Ghost
  • From: hanson
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: SBC Yahoo
• Re: illustration about the em-field
  • From: Androcles
• Re: illustration about the em-field
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: DarkMatter
• Re: NEW EXACT MATH
  • From: Mark Johnson
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Sni
• Re: illustration about the em-field
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Take your Diamond and jewellery business to the next level with eDiamondHub.com.
  • From: DIAMONDS
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: none
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: none
• Re: Riccati, The Key Formula To The Universe
  • From: none
• Zero Origin Universe Update.
  • From: maxkeon
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: illustration about the em-field
  • From: Androcles
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• EC-funded Research Visits: Application Deadline 15/05/2008
  • From: europa
• illustration about the em-field
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: NEW EXACT MATH
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 251.8: India and UCLA Results Indicate PI Better Than Conditional Probability for Quantum Secret Sharing
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 251.7: Zero or Near Zero Velocity Studied in Brazil
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 251.5: Do All Masses in the Universe Contain Black Holes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• NEW EXACT MATH
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• hysicsworld.com newswire (Week 19)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 8 May 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Riccati, The Key Formula To The Universe
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: none
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: none
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: none
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Riccati, The Key Formula To The Universe
  • From: none
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: OG
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Time dilatation in circular motion
  • From: John Park
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Researchers make triangular, square and other polygonal vortices appear in swirling water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: OG
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Quantum Gravity 251.5: Do All Masses in the Universe Contain Black Holes?
  • From: john
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Riccati, The Key Formula To The Universe
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Would Earth's Horizon Appear Much Higher If Earth Was an Infinite Plane?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: HEY DARWIN123, I'M TALKING TO YOU! was Re: Gravity inside a spherical shell in non-Euclidean space
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Benj
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: CWatters
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Richard Henry
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp.
  • From: davidmabus2012
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Sni
• HEY DARWIN123, I'M TALKING TO YOU! was Re: Gravity inside a spherical shell in non-Euclidean space
  • From: George Smith
• A Time Constant- t1
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Core temperature and density profile measurements in inertial confinement fusion implosions
  • From: ayaz
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: Androcles
• video!!
  • From: tobiaszwawrzyniak
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: Dan in Philly
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• E = m c^2 and Riccati
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Quantum Gravity 251.6: Black Holes Involve 3 Objects: A set A, a generally proper subset C of A, and an "Arbitary" set B on which both A and C may or may not Operate Causally
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 251.5: Do All Masses in the Universe Contain Black Holes?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Nitrogenous fertilizer : Please need help
  • From: Androcles
• My postings in the newsgroup
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: none
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: none
• Re: Riccati, The Key Formula To The Universe
  • From: Igor
• Quantum Gravity 251.4: Black Holes Don't Evaporate But Create Matter
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Nitrogenous fertilizer : Please need help
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nitrogenous fertilizer : Please need help
  • From: Huang
• Nitrogenous fertilizer : Please need help
  • From: saferdina
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Benj
• Re: How lasers really workHow lasers really work
  • From: Benj
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: Justintruth
• How lasers really workHow lasers really work
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Riccati, The Key Formula To The Universe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Riccati, The Key Formula To The Universe
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Work Done
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Work Done
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Riccati, The Key Formula To The Universe
  • From: Doug
• Riccati, The Key Formula To The Universe
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Work Done
  • From: PD
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Work Done
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Work Done
  • From: rambotrout
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Sni
• Re: Work Done
  • From: PD
• Re: Work Done
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Work Done
  • From: rambotrout
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Work Done
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Work Done
  • From: PD
• Work Done
  • From: rambotrout
• Re: Infinity below the Planck scale.
  • From: Huang
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Infinity below the Planck scale.
  • From: Y.Porat
• cerdit for inventions
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Posts by mental patients
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Benj
• Re: A Riccati differential equation
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Reflection of a Ghost
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Gravity 251.3: More Re tan(t)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 251.3: More Re tan(t)
  • From: OsherD
• Reflection of a Ghost
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 251.2: Arizona State U. and Australia Relate tan(t) to Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Robert Hubbard
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Would Earth's Horizon Appear Much Higher If Earth Was an Infinite Plane?
  • From: giveitawhril2008
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Would Earth's Horizon Appear Much Higher If Earth Was an Infinite Plane?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Would Earth's Horizon Appear Much Higher If Earth Was an Infinite Plane?
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: PD
• Would Earth's Horizon Appear Much Higher If Earth Was an Infinite Plane?
  • From: giveitawhril2008
• Re: Where does the Bernoulli effect come from?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Infinity below the Planck scale.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: d . 086
• Re: A Riccati differential equation
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: OG
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Dragons of Islam, remember your origin....
  • From: Automutt
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: PD
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: hanson
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: jfisher864
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: CWatters
• Re: How is the mass of the W boson calculated?
  • From: PD
• Re: A Riccati differential equation
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: A Riccati differential equation
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Help and try to find mysterious Einstein"s photograph.
  • From: Enes
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Benj
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp.
  • From: David Mabus2
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Benj
• Re: Why is static friction different from dynamic friction?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How is the mass of the W boson calculated?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Infinity below the Planck scale.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Why is static friction different from dynamic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• A Riccati differential equation
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Why is static friction different from dynamic friction?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: peterbone
• Lorentz Invariance MAY Cause a Force for Slow Light
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: Red Diamond
• Re: Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Plane wing, faster flow, low air pressure
  • From: Dan in Philly
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Sni
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Why is static friction different from dynamic friction?
  • From: PD
• Re: Where does the Bernoulli effect come from?
  • From: PD
• Re: Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: PD
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• unsolved problems in physics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• How is the mass of the W boson calculated?
  • From: david . griffiths
• Ukrainian Crafts: Inlaid Wood Cross
  • From: liukaiyuan
• Re: Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Where does the Bernoulli effect come from?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: peterbone
• Re: Why is static friction different from dynamic friction?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Infinity below the Planck scale.
  • From: Rushtown
• Re: Where does the Bernoulli effect come from?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Quantum Gravity 251.1: Swiss Find Hilbert Space Deficient in Decoding
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Where does the Bernoulli effect come from?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Why is static friction different from dynamic friction?
  • From: Joris Dolderer
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 251.01: Canadian Alternating Matrices Reveal Why Semantic "Information" is Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Type
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: none
• Re: Is Einstein, Jr. Out There?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Cross
  • From: Androcles
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Sni
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Making Robots Part X - Conclusion
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: FLT and New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Making Robots Part IX - Interface
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Making Robots Part VIII - balance
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sad News. John Wheeler is dead.
  • From: Bio Freak
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: PD
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Making Robots Part VII - Robot Wars
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: CO2 induced global warming is impossible
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: CO2 induced global warming is impossible
  • From: Tom
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: PD
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: jfisher864
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: jfisher864
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: jfisher864
• CO2 induced global warming is impossible
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Making Robots
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: REVISED LIST OF WORLD'S GREATEST SCIENTISTS.
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: REVISED LIST OF WORLD'S GREATEST SCIENTISTS.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 249.0: The tan(x) Solution of Riccati Differential Equation and The Fundamental Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}
  • From: Riens Udegk
• Re: Making Robots
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Experimental UPdate- Eagleson Drive an emdrive nOT
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Making Robots Part VI - Acessorizing
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Making Robots Part V
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Making Robots Part IV
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Astronomers Discover New Type of Pulsating White Dwarf Star
  • From: kim . jeffery1
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: PD
• Re: Making Robots Part III
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: PD
• Re: Get a lot before you die!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Making Robots Part II
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Uncertainty isn't a measured quantity; it is an untestable idea
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physics with quaternions
  • From: Androcles
• Making Robots
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Physics with quaternions
  • From: Thomas Heger
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 05, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: The General Solution of the 3D Wave Equation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: Benj
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp......
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Experimental UPdate- Eagleson Drive an emdrive nOT
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: A 4 thousand year old battle.
  • From: Bio Freak
• Re: Effects of uniform and constant electromagnetic fields on the stability of thin layer of liquid metal flow
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: PD
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Get a lot before you die!
  • From: Bio Freak
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp......
  • From: david mabus
• Re: The General Solution of the 3D Wave Equation
  • From: symphony
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: jfisher864
• My Jade Tree
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: jfisher864
• Re: Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: peterbone
• Re: Experimental UPdate- Eagleson Drive an emdrive nOT
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Experimental UPdate- Eagleson Drive an emdrive nOT
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The General Solution of the 3D Wave Equation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The General Solution of the 3D Wave Equation
  • From: symphony
• Re: Experimental UPdate- Eagleson Drive an emdrive nOT
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Experimental UPdate- Eagleson Drive an emdrive nOT
  • From: Uncle Al
• Addendum- Physics-note1
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Riesz Representation Theorem -- sort of
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: jfisher864
• Re: Gravity is photons?
  • From: gubbenimanen
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Robert Hubbard
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Esab
• Re: Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: CWatters
• Quantumphysics with quaternions
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Experimental UPdate- Eagleson Drive an emdrive nOT
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: please help me think about a billion-year-old meter stick
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: Androcles
• Re: please help me think about a billion-year-old meter stick
  • From: Matt
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: Androcles
• Car and trailer mathematical model
  • From: peterbone
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: matter and radiation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: matter and radiation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Help and try to find mysterious Einstein"s photograph.
  • From: Enes
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: jfisher864
• Re: Quantum Gravity 250.4: Use of 1 To Represent Infinity To Get Near-Earth Approximation of Stars
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The General Solution of the 3D Wave Equation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Quantum Gravity 250.4: Use of 1 To Represent Infinity To Get Near-Earth Approximation of Stars
  • From: Huang
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Huang
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 250.4: Use of 1 To Represent Infinity To Get Near-Earth Approximation of Stars
  • From: OsherD
• Re: You “ chose ” ( ha ha ) to die when you “ chose ” to be born.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: matter and radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: matter and radiation
  • From: RichD
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: matter and radiation
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: matter and radiation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins-Myers Corp.
  • From: David Mabus2
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The General Solution of the 3D Wave Equation
  • From: symphony
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: matter and radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: Huang
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Maybe the Eagleson Effect is a Drag
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Maybe the Eagleson Effect is a Drag
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: hanson
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Help and try to find mysterious Einstein"s photograph.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Help and try to find mysterious Einstein"s photograph.
  • From: Enes
• Re: matter and radiation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: matter and radiation
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: hanson
• Maybe the Eagleson Effect is a Drag
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: john
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• p (Eagleson Effect Frame) = h*nu/c-group velocity for ALL GUAGE
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: matter and radiation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Group Velocity- Why is its Effect is c Limited?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Group Velocity- Why is its Effect is c Limited?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Help and try to find mysterious Einstein"s photograph.
  • From: Enes
• Quantum Gravity 250.3: Dark Matter Annihilation in Gravitational Field of Black Hole Consistent with Probable Causation/Influence
  • From: OsherD
• matter and radiation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins Corp...
  • From: davidmabus96
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: Huang
• Re: CERN: False Premise to False Conclusion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Need help writimg differential equation for simple mixing tank
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: hanson
• FLT and New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Violation of copyright?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: Androcles
• Violation of copyright?
  • From: TimE
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: hanson
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: Huang
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: hanson
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Esab
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• You “ chose ” ( ha ha ) to die when you “ chose ” to be born.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: Androcles
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 250.2: Fundamental Set Characterizes Geometric Mean Noncommutatively
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Need help writimg differential equation for simple mixing tank
  • From: brobigi
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: hanson
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: scintillator Qu
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: Huang
• Radio telescope reveals secrets of massive black hole
  • From: che . nitty
• scintillator Qu
  • From: jfisher864
• Re: Photons in an electric field
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Group Velocity- Why is its Effect is c Limited?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: OG
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Photons in an electric field
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: OG
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 02 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Paul Mays
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: OG
• Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday 02 May 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data
  • From: Cannellino
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: world formula
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: OG
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: OG
• Re: Gravity inside a spherical shell in non-Euclidean space
  • From: George Smith
• Re: Need help writimg differential equation for simple mixing tank
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Kinetic Monte Carlo
  • From: biplabbose@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Need help writimg differential equation for simple mixing tank
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Photons in an electric field
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: john
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Group Velocity- Why is its Effect is c Limited?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Photons in an electric field
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Act
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: PD
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• "The Creation of a Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Esab
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: PD
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: PD
• ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: ACE
• Re: Get a lot before you die!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: world formula
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Does light of a different frequency mean a different number of photons?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: katbo
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Photons in an electric field
  • From: Ray Johnstone
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Earth Is Growing
  • From: Florian
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Formula for Decelerating Light
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Quantum Gravity 250.1: Arithmetic Partial Differential Equations May Supercede GR Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: world formula
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 250.0: Fundamental Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26} and Ackermann Function
  • From: OsherD
• Re: world formula
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: world formula
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Quantum Gravity 249.2: y = tan(u) versus y = sqrt(1 - u^2) in Special Relativity versus Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new blithering douche-nozzle with no weenie
  • From: Invalid Sphysics
• Re: world formula
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: none
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 1 May 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Yanick Toutain
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: b . short48
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Invalid Sphysics
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: Huang
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: Huang
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: Huang
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: OG
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Problem with a formula in special relativity
  • From: mL
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: PD
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: PD
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: world formula
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: world formula
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Problem with a formula in special relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: I know what the LHC will find :)
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Problem with a formula in special relativity
  • From: Eoghan
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• I know what the LHC will find :)
  • From: Jackass
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: wall thickness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: world formula
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Ray Vickson
• world formula
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• wall thickness
  • From: phyman
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: PD
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: PD
• Apparent contradiction with Lorentz Transformation: Where's my mistake?
  • From: ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: High-flying electrons may provide new test of quantum theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Problem with a formula in special relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Symposium “Image Processing and Analysis” within the ICCES'09 Thailand - Announce & Call for Papers
  • From: tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Re: 'Buckypaper' stretches in a strange way
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Esab
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Mike
• Re: Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: Mike
• Proof that existence is a dichotomy
  • From: Huang
• Re: Is Einstein, Jr. Out There?
  • From: srp2inc
• Electric
  • From: shenlishu520
• Re: Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: High-flying electrons may provide new test of quantum theory
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: High-flying electrons may provide new test of quantum theory
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: W and Z ~ Created from whole cloth?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Next decade 'may see no warming'
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Uniform motion
  • From: Phantom
• Problem with a formula in special relativity
  • From: Eoghan
• Need help writimg differential equation for simple mixing tank
  • From: brobigi
• Re: Unnamed posters in the NG
  • From: Basti05b
• High-flying electrons may provide new test of quantum theory
  • From: fernandas . maria1
• Re: Hubble Law in a simple program
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Gravity 249.2: y = tan(u) versus y = sqrt(1 - u^2) in Special Relativity versus Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Benj
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: jimp
• Re: My New Energy Formula
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• 'Buckypaper' stretches in a strange way
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: It's fun to light / nurse / watch the ember.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Questions Einstein got wrong:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Quantum Gravity 249.3: Light As the "Trivial" Riccati Case
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Seminars on New Math
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: jimp
• Quantum Gravity 249.2: y = tan(u) versus y = sqrt(1 - u^2) in Special Relativity versus Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Follow That Cosmic Jet
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The sun's rays
  • From: DarkMatter
• Quantum Gravity 249.1: Special Relativity At Most Applies To Tangential Motion, Not Expansion-Contraction
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 248.4: Japan Comes To Rescue With Kinetic Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: jimp
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Do we measure wavelength or frequency?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Hubble Law in a simple program
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Follow That Cosmic Jet
  • From: john
• Re: Hubble Law in a simple program
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Top ten Inventions of the 20th Century
  • From: hanson
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Tired Light is Still Dead
  • From: Sam Wormley