Re: Formula for Decelerating Light

On May 3, 8:22 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Michael Helland wrote:

On May 2, 11:20 pm, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 3, 12:26 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>

Show a derivation of your formula....

Instead of calculating a Hubble distance, calculate Hubble time
instead.

Expansion time and deceleration time are identical, because f = 1/t.

Idiot. Time is observer-dependent. There is no absolute clock


When we calculate a Hubble distance, is that absolute space?

No.

So why would you assume Hubble time would be absolute time?

There is no absolute clock. Right.

You observe frequency, and you observe Hubble redshift, and in c = f
w, whether c is constant and w expands, or w is constant and c
decelerates, you'll have the same values for f.

Expansion is an optical illusion based on a literal interpretation of
a mathematical "zoom" trick (leading to w expanding) all just to keep
c constant.
.

Quantcast