Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: jjsajd@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 13:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
On May 3, 5:58 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 2, 11:20 pm, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 3, 12:26 am, MichaelHelland<mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Show a derivation of your formula....
Instead of calculating a Hubble distance, calculate Hubble time
instead.
Expansion time and deceleration time are identical, because f = 1/t.
Unlike Uncle Al I am interested to know where you dug these numbers up
from
v = 1 - (t * (20* 1.05702341) * 10^-13) like the 20 and 1.05702341...
Cheers
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- References:
- Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- From: Michael Helland
- Formula for Decelerating Light
- Prev by Date: Re: Speed of Light is Constant in Tired Light Models, Decelerated Light is a new model
- Next by Date: Maybe the Eagleson Effect is a Drag
- Previous by thread: Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- Next by thread: Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|