Re: linear fitting: different errors on X data and Y data

"Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_b3Tj.3132$8q4.770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
| > | http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/06a1da4e2fa1b80b
| > | wherein Androcles wrote:
| > | > I'll tell you what it is...
| > | > Excel doesn't give the results an Einstein Dingleberry wants,
| > | > so Excel is at fault. See [1] here:
| > | > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Doppler/V0.866.JPG
| > | > I'll dig out that program from my old computer some day...
| > | > or recreate it.
| > | >
| > | hanson wrote:
| > | Yeah, I remember that. Great job!. Lead you to Algol, IIRC?
| >
| Androcles wrote:
| > Nah, that was a 1987 DOS "c" version of Copernicus.exe,
| > a c++ program I wrote way back in 1993. It's still running today,
| > but I scrapped the DOS stuff when it became obvious that
| > Windows was going to be the industry leader.
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Copernicus.exe
| >
| > That was before the days of viruses when I was living under the
| > delusion that people were intelligent and would actually understand
| > it. Nowadays I suppose you'd call it a classic, it's 15 years old.
| > There is serendipity here, I scrapped the first DOS version when I
| > "realised" (after a few pints of strong ale) that it wasn't ever going
| > to reproduce the light curve of Algol even though it did reproduce
| > some cepheids, and I was pretty busy back then anyway as a project
| > leader on an industrial vision system working with Motorola processors
| > and a Gould minicomputer that had its own air-conditioned room.
| > I only recreated a Windows version because I needed to familiarise
| > myself with Intel processors and c++, and then purely by chance I
| > saw something that approximated Algol and that led me to research
| > and investigate it further, or I'd still be an ED.
| >
| hanson wrote:
| > | But spare yourself future efforts about [1] because REL-gious
| > | conversions from ED'ism to rationality in real world existence
| > | only happens in the school of Hard Knox. We went thru that. [2]
| >
| Androcles wrote:
| > Yeah... I've got a few dozen blood-stained T-shirts that read
| > "Property of H.M. Government, School of Hard Knox Dept."
| > Her Majesty still waves and smiles to me, but oy wey, no
| > knighthood has been forthcoming. Go figure... I did get a
| > blue tie with a gold emblem on it though (now blood-stained).
| > http://www.queensawards.org.uk/business/Award_Categories
| > /International_Trade.html
| >
| hanson wrote:
| How did the formatting get all out of whack in your reply? ...
| There were no carriage returns all in the following segment:

| Androcles wrote:
That's an OE bug.
When a string of characters as in http://www.queensaw...
above exceeds width limit the CR/LF vanishes. Usually
I use tinyurl for long strings but I missed it this time.
Sorry about that.

hanson wrote:
Is there one or a set of characters that can be inserted or
attached to a long url to prevent the CR/LF negation?
I have tried this <url> instead of the naked url and it
seemed to work. When I stared that practice a few months
back it must have been picked up by or referred to google
who corrected the situation and it, the <>, appears to be
no longer necessary.... until now... ahahaha...

hanson wrote:
| [2] We posted about it and told how we, in grad school, both
| threatened Einstein doubters with beating the *** out of them...
| ... and then came our gradual exodus out of the darkness of
| Einstein's cul-de sac into the light of the rising sun...ahaha...
| eventually realizing what is really going on...
|
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/b09ab8bdc8f2ae70
| .... hence Einstein Dingleberries are here to linger on in their
| fantasy world of contstructs of cons and out-right lies as can be
| seen in the heuristic use of REL in the real world where:
|
| = mil/indust. Eng, R&D....................."does not need REL ***"
| = *.edu and grantology ..................."does need REL, No ***"
| = Promo, Sales & Movies..............."loves REL by the shitload"
| = Jews protect it as cultural heritage whether "REL is *** or not".
| >
| Ergo: REL is a con, a story, a fable, a tale, called a theory.
| Washing dishes or cars for an hour will earn you enough
| money to buy you a hamburger... But no amount of promoting
| & proselytizing REL will ever buy you anything in the real world
| unless you belong in the upper strata of the hierarchies in
| the appropriate places as summarized in the 4-liner above...
| Remember, here in these NG's it's mostly (a) the geriatric
| "cultural" ilk that is so pathetically and fanatically trying to sell
| REL & (b) many times it's their goyim victims, known as
| Einstein Dingleberries, whom they were able to brainwash
| and do their bidding... Thanks for the laughs, dude...ahahahaha...
| ahahaha... ....ahahanson
| >
| Androcles wrote:
| Yep...
| >
| hanson wrote:
| BTW, it is telling about the mentation of Einstein Dingleberries
| in these NG's for them to say that Excel will not return their
| desired results. That may be due to the fact that one seldom
| sees even one of'em to carry out a single calculation.

Androcles wrote:
Most don't have a web page either. Schwartzschit and Dork
Van de merde are exceptions rather than the rule, but I leave
you to judge the quality.
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/TwinsEvents.html
He actually draws in text on his own web page, though what it is
supposed to be only Dork knows.
As for carrying out a calculation, ya gotta love this line:
"So if T = 5 years and v = 0.8c, then the stay at home twin will
have aged 10 years" -- and he's the fumble mumbler.
Another Dingleberry is ASS-istant professor Andersen (Tusseladd,
or Norwegian troll) who really DID say Excel was in error on a
minus sign.

hanson wrote:
| All they do is to parrot
| what someone else has said, most notoriously rect-Al Schwartz
| who believes that if he scours the web and does cut and paste
| jobs and screams loud enough he will become smart... ahaha...

Androcles wrote:
Not hard to see through, is it? Totally transparent.

hanson wrote:
| Astonishingly some goyim Einstein Dingleberries do believe in
| rect-Al's world which he daily visits and urges his follower to do
| the same: <http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg>
| ahahaha.. ahahaha... ahahahanon

Androcles wrote:
Yes, but it's no different to gazillions of Pope, Prophet, Messiah or
Buddha followers who believe and repeat what they are told to
believe, and mostly in fear of what their neighbours will think of
them or do to them if they fail to conform to orthodoxy.
Kings, Presidents and Priests know it, of course, and manipulate
themselves into power by hiring thugs to do their bidding;
whether the name is Mugabe or Elizabeth or Bush or Hitler or
Stalin or Hussein, Einstein is essentially no different, the thug
mentality of sheep following the leader doesn't change. Let's
face it, Schwartz is a bullying thug.

hanson wrote:
..... ahahaha.. AHAHAHA... well, to me uncle rect-Al Schwartz
is actually very funny when he tries to shine soooo.... hard
in his <http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg>
Generally I do agree with your assessment in that
REL and Einstein's crap, like all...

==Religion is a tool that is used by the few to *** the many==
and the few know but the many do not that
==Nobody is born religious. Religion is an acquired disease==

Take care, old mate,
hanson

PS in case you've missed my insert in the middle of the post
above:
Is there one or a set of characters that can be inserted or
attached to a long url to prevent the CR/LF negation?
I have tried this <url> instead of the naked url and it
seemed to work. When I stared that practice a few months
back it must have been picked up by or referred to google
who corrected the situation and it, the <>, appears to be
no longer necessary.... until now... ahahaha...






.

Quantcast