Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- From: Basti05b@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 03:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I have answered your questions on these sites:
Well, it's probably erroneous to even call the
Riccati equation mathematics. Since it's one
of the few nonlinear differential equations that
have any applications outside of chemistry.
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1739381&tstart=15
and
http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=6208114&tstart=15
In short any other non-linear differential equations are already
included in Riccati, or existence theorems of ODE and PDE complements
the computations (see the math -chart).
Dr.M.Basti
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- References:
- E = m c^2 and Riccati
- From: Basti05b
- Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- E = m c^2 and Riccati
- Prev by Date: Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- Next by Date: Re: unsolved problems in physics
- Previous by thread: Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- Next by thread: Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|