Re: Formula for Decelerating Light

On May 8, 3:48 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 8, 8:17 am, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On May 8, 6:12 am, MichaelHelland<mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>

Mikepeople have tried to explain why your wrong to you, but you don't
seem to listen so believe what-ever the hell you want.

Most people have said "The Speed of Light is Constant!" and thought
that was it.

Yes because of experimental evidence... none of which you grasp...

<snip> crap

But to each his own.

For those like you who will never hear reason.... yes...

Someone made an excellent point, that if very old light was slower
than new light, we would see them drop away from the edge of the moon
in delays according to distance.

That was an excellent criticism.

Which however you ignored along with the issue of Tolman Surface
Brightness test...

<snip>

In other words, the effects of gravity on old light would be the same
on new light.

But that can't possibly be right.

You know this how? Because you've studied cosmology in depth? No.. you
have no idea of what the hell your talking about.

<snip> didn't someone post a reading list for you, have you read a
single book off of the list? No, well since that is the case go read
some books then come back...

Just for shits and giggles, do you know why quantum mechanics makes
extensive use of harmonic oscillators? Or how to solve a partial
differential equation?

Cheers

.